Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - kix

Pages: 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ... 168
681
Showcases / Re: Kix has made Robot Rumble 2.0 bots
« on: September 17, 2019, 05:22:42 AM »
I remember atomic having the same setup like yours in series 7

EDIT: It had it when ot fought M2

682
Showcases / Re: Kix has made Robot Rumble 2.0 bots
« on: September 17, 2019, 12:26:00 AM »
It's hard to give feedback without a meta.

Kinda a shame, because most of these are beautiful.
Problem is that most boomers dont care about RR2, and most zoomers cant run RR2 on their IBM's

683
Showcases / Re: Kix has made Robot Rumble 2.0 bots
« on: September 17, 2019, 12:21:46 AM »

I did some minor stuff that doesn't make it 100% accurate, like no atomic on its sides (might do them tho (kill me)
Bruh me and wham are gonna have to fight for the supreme atomic lmao


Also it seems like RR2 showcases are kinda not getting enough attention imo

684
From a guy that doesnt like standard meta:
Second one looks lit ngl

685
Tournament Archives / Re: Boomer Brawl SBV 👴👊
« on: September 16, 2019, 01:28:41 AM »
Shouldve Kept It Dead - nah because this bot needs work and you need practice.
That would mean that id have to make DSL-S bots. Playing RA2 itself is a yikes for me

I can't really tell what the spike rack is supposed to do from this angle.
Well you see, without it would be just another sh**ty vert. That rack eliminates any chances of that vert actually touching opponents

686
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: BOTM and Challenge Belt Feedback
« on: September 15, 2019, 11:46:53 PM »
Just gonna say I liked the FOTEPEX botm (makes people actually want to post on showcases)

And a Parsec companion belt for metas other than irl would be sweet
That would mean that other people would need to play other metas, and i remember some challenge belts where only one person entered because it was something something unrealistic

687
Tournament Archives / Re: Boomer Brawl SBV 👴👊
« on: September 15, 2019, 11:43:21 PM »
Bruh i have to fight a bot that was intended for DSL-S rigged

688
Challenge Board / Re: NickyDustyOwl Vs Bildschirm
« on: September 15, 2019, 05:06:59 PM »
DSL-IRL
HW
Robot Wars 2016 Arena
Bo3
RA2CF, BFE, and OBJRA2 allowed
DSC's IRL Packs, Badnik Recolors, Geese's NPC fixes, etc, are allowed
Cb2: Flatmotors, Overkill Motor, Hworf Blades, Judge Burst Motor, MOE Motor, Ronin Motor.
Lord Hoppin To Host

? What? You havent even asked me to host hahaha
Bruh getting asked is such a beta thing to do

689
Contests / Re: Replica Challenge
« on: September 15, 2019, 02:34:58 PM »
As well as choosing the bot I think you should choose what it should be made in. Otherwise someone who builds a real solid stock bot will almost always get beaten out by someone who makes and renders a CAD
Maybe different categories?
Stock/IF, DSL, RR2/CAD?
Maybe?
Epic?

690
Contests / Re: Replica Challenge
« on: September 15, 2019, 02:32:20 PM »
As well as choosing the bot I think you should choose what it should be made in. Otherwise someone who builds a real solid stock bot will almost always get beaten out by someone who makes and renders a CAD
Maybe different categories?
Stock/IF, DSL, RR2/CAD?

691
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: BOTM and Challenge Belt Feedback
« on: September 15, 2019, 12:30:33 PM »
I think there was one month that got missed entirely. So it just needs to be a little better organised.
One month had one entry as sad as it is
This month there are already more enteries

692
Contests / Re: Replica Challenge
« on: September 15, 2019, 12:28:44 PM »
bruh im down too

693
Contests / Re: Botober 2019
« on: September 15, 2019, 10:29:42 AM »
3rd Oct is gonna be woke

694
option to make parts indestructible

Oof.  This one is hard.  It will require working on the backend code as well as coming up with the UI on the front end.  Then it will need testing.

Is it worth it if it takes a few more weeks/months?  I don’t imagine that we would want this in the released game...

Maybe add a tick option when you select a part in the materials section? It should not be that extra difficult to add indestructibility so yeah, few weeks/month is gucci, ofc we dont want to have this in final release because by then we will have functional damage i guess

695
option to make parts indestructible

696
Showcases / Re: Post Your RR2 Bots
« on: September 14, 2019, 05:50:09 PM »
Posting this here so more people see it

697
Showcases / Re: Kix has made Robot Rumble 2.0 bots
« on: September 14, 2019, 05:49:16 PM »

698
Site News and Feedback / Re: New Admin
« on: September 14, 2019, 05:36:55 PM »
Best of luck to Orc, hes gonna need it

699
Contests / Re: Vote BOTM September IRL
« on: September 14, 2019, 12:09:18 PM »
Did Kix enter 2 of his own and still lose?
Hint: They were last month enteries

700
New Bleeding Edge Test Build is out!

http://www.robot-rumble.com/bleedingedgebuilds/

The latest versions are the 14SEPTEMBER2019 builds.

Two things for this build:

1. [Bug Fix] Eliminated Depth of Field postprocessing effect.  This was causing excessive blur in the robot workshop when working on beetleweight robots.
2. [Tweaked] Adjusted friction coefficients to the following:

Aluminum: 0.4
Polycarbonate: 0.2
Rubber: 0.9
Steel: 0.3
UHMW: 0.05
MDF: 0.3

With this fix, friction coefficients are pretty close to their real-life values.  Robots should now skid much more believably.

Let me know if driving feels good with the 14SEPTEMBER build.  If so, we can finally start working on damage.  :gunz:



Ok so...
Friction is amazing, its working perfeclty
As for the damage... Maybe add a button where you can make a component invincible? That would be great for battles, also not a bad thing before the damage stuff gets added, because fully invincible bots are eh in my opinion

Pages: 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ... 168