This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Badger
3081
« on: March 30, 2016, 05:34:19 AM »
I'd love to see wedgeless IF BW
Why wedgeless for Botm
idk I have wedge PTSD
3082
« on: March 30, 2016, 05:27:33 AM »
looks solid, so long as the wedges are decent (typical IF), why did you go for battleaxes instead of blades?
3083
« on: March 29, 2016, 06:49:12 PM »
I'd love to see wedgeless IF BW
That means I should make a popup, right?
ayy. Still waiting on yugi "Usian Glacier" tom jokes m8 ty for hosting
3084
« on: March 29, 2016, 06:32:21 PM »
I'd love to see wedgeless IF BW
3085
« on: March 29, 2016, 09:29:21 AM »
The pistons on henchmen were at just the right height to hit redace's bot easily, pretty easy win. Could you put the turnspeed on Henchman down by like .5 please?
3086
« on: March 29, 2016, 09:03:26 AM »
Matches 5 and 6 posted, videos placed into playlist and made public.
3087
« on: March 28, 2016, 02:49:44 PM »
Just asking something slightly off topic: where do you go if you want to ask questions about things like development and all that to the developers?
e-mail the devs I guess. Or tweet, but their twitter seems totally inactive
3088
« on: March 28, 2016, 01:11:43 PM »
Yeah but cba w/ that. Puu.sh and pomf.cat (the one I used originally) are much faster.
3089
« on: March 28, 2016, 12:08:19 PM »
I forget, did you put any ballasts in there?
From the looks of this picture that I took, I have two. 
Maybe it could do with 4, if the drive can handle it? idk but apparently car steering in IF is super janky haha
3090
« on: March 28, 2016, 11:43:27 AM »
Huh. I didn't test it much, but I think that was something that happened while AI'ing it. Bu t I assumed that was "lol Ironforge physics" doing that.
Ah well. Good game Badger.
Yeah, it freaked me out the first time, the video file has about 30 seconds of black where I'm just processing what the hell happened. To be honest I don't think it mattered, BBEAN's low walls don't mix with ironforge's powerful motors and HS. I forget, did you put any ballasts in there?
3091
« on: March 28, 2016, 11:41:44 AM »
Really cool to see you playing Ironforge, we need more people building cool stuff! Iron Phoenix looks sick. Do the wheels last long on Undertaker vs popups?
3092
« on: March 28, 2016, 09:40:18 AM »
From what I've read it straight up doesn't, and AMD users need to use a CPU-only version which has a ton of features stripped from it. If it means a better physics engine it's great for nVidia users but really sucks for everyone else, and I imagine a significant playerbase of this game will be people without a dedicated gaming rig (more likely to have AMD/no GFX card)
It's not actually that bad as you make it sound to be. PhysX do work on AMD cpu just fine. Most of the features that was disabled on AMD cpu aren't important, such as extra physical particles, physical volume cloud particles, etc etc. AMD users aren't really missing out much because most developers don't actually use them in their games.
Kerbal Space Program is a good example of using PhysX and AMD players playing the game just fine.
I was thinking more of AMD GPUs rather than CPUs. But yeah, so long as everyone can play it equally ,it's cool
3093
« on: March 28, 2016, 09:19:30 AM »
4th match uploaded, and with that the first section of the upper bracket is complete! I'll upload the first 2 lower bracket games tomorrow
3094
« on: March 28, 2016, 08:45:16 AM »
I've sent Badger a pm regarding his entry. Just waiting until he gets back to me.
Sorry, the filesharing site I used must only hold the files for a couple days, I'm reuploading to puush now.
3095
« on: March 28, 2016, 07:13:05 AM »
I reply it later.
3096
« on: March 28, 2016, 05:37:42 AM »
Don't mix up PhysX as a physics engine choice with PhysX as a high end Nvidia exclusive feature. This game will almost certainly use the low end physX that comes with many engines that works absolutely fine on the CPU.
Cool, thanks for the insight.
3097
« on: March 28, 2016, 05:20:29 AM »
Why would you want this? and wouldn't it be called unityexplosion
Uhh it should be Physxplosion since the game's using the Physx physics engine.
Really? Looking forward to it not working on AMD.
That's a good point, forgot about that. It's not going to be a a resourceful game though, I guess you can run it through the integrated graphics card?
Don't worry, this game's requirements are so low that you"ll be able to get 120 FPS maxed out even if Physx physically makes AMD cards explode.
I'm pretty it just straight up doesn't work with AMD cards.
From what I've read it straight up doesn't, and AMD users need to use a CPU-only version which has a ton of features stripped from it. If it means a better physics engine it's great for nVidia users but really sucks for everyone else, and I imagine a significant playerbase of this game will be people without a dedicated gaming rig (more likely to have AMD/no GFX card)
3098
« on: March 28, 2016, 05:13:20 AM »
Why would you want this? and wouldn't it be called unityexplosion
Uhh it should be Physxplosion since the game's using the Physx physics engine.
Really? Looking forward to it not working on AMD.
Don't worry, this game's requirements are so low that you"ll be able to get 120 FPS maxed out even if Physx physically makes AMD cards explode.
I swear physx doesn't even run on AMD. Not an issue for me but I'm not a fan of companies supporting nvidia's sh**ty anti-consumer business practises.
3099
« on: March 28, 2016, 04:36:18 AM »
Why would you want this? and wouldn't it be called unityexplosion
Uhh it should be Physxplosion since the game's using the Physx physics engine.
Really? Looking forward to it not working on AMD.
3100
« on: March 27, 2016, 07:49:17 PM »
I've been listening to so much bad music ironically idk if I like it ironically or unironically anymore.
|
Show Posts