Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - 09090901

Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ... 82
421
Site News and Feedback / advance spammers
« on: February 08, 2019, 02:52:11 AM »
So apparently spammers now have more insight in ra2 than zoomers


how long before they start making spambots in ra2???

422
Site News and Feedback / Chatterbox is back
« on: February 07, 2019, 03:07:50 AM »
Chatterbox is back for those who joined the optional membergroup.

To join, go to the group membership section in your profile and select the chatterbox usergroup. Anyone who has already joined the chatterbox will not have to rejoin

Feel free to go back through all the threads if you want to reminisce on the 'good ol days', or just get a feel of how active this site used to be back in the day. 2010-11 were the best imo

don't do anything stupid like 5000 hitler/tito image threads or start massive flame wars. I don't think this needs to be said but still

also before anyone asks, playground is 100% dead. it can't be brought back.


423
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: thanks code red
« on: February 05, 2019, 01:56:17 PM »
hey can you do us a favor and not post these in the ra2 section

424
Discussion / MOVED: thanks code red
« on: February 05, 2019, 01:55:05 PM »

425
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Redalert's rare DSL builds and WS
« on: February 04, 2019, 04:42:33 PM »
you're still using too many batteries for everything that doesn't have bursts

426
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Redalert's rare DSL builds and WS
« on: February 01, 2019, 01:50:42 PM »
I'm honestly not sure why you guys are still responding

427
Tournament Archives / Re: gtmcs 3?
« on: January 31, 2019, 09:41:41 PM »
I would still prefer something like the BBEANS V2 Arena if just for a hazard that actually tests turning or wedge capabilities of the AI.  I also agree with the arena for IF being enclosed or banning flippers entirely.  If possible, maybe the ELBITE arena could provide the best of both worlds?  Hell, maybe just give every meta a unique arena designed with it in mind so that each tournament feels a tad more unique.  Just a thought.
I'm really not a fan of hazards in the center of the arena, or at least the one bbeans arena. fme, it usually just screws over wide robots that get snagged on the barrier, or it just force everyone to use a higher than average radius that screws with the AI when it's near the flippers

Haven't seen the elbite arena yet but I'll check it out

428
Tournament Archives / Re: gtmcs 3?
« on: January 31, 2019, 05:44:50 PM »
Quote from: geese
The arena to be used is still up in the air. One idea I had was to use a different arena for each meta to help certain bot types in stock and If.
The GTMCS2 arena seemed to work pretty well for IRL and Stock. In an arena that was harder to get OOTAs in verts would probably have dominated even more than they ended up doing in the IRL division.

Stock seemed to work okay too. Maybe an arena with something in the centre a la the BBEANS arena would have prevented the boxrush install KOs that we saw, but then that would take away the viability of a but like Fractures, which was pretty neat to watch wrecking HSes and Popups last time.

IF is the only real place I can see needing a substantial change of arena. Flippers are already strong as hell in IF and in arena with walls as low as the GTMCS2 arena had one was always gonna win.
Box rush kills aren't my biggest worry with stock, it's mainly how dominant HS are compared to other bot types at the HW level. that is just the nature of the meta tho, and they aren't completely invincible so if nobody else has an issue I'm fine with whatever arena people want

IF will probably be either an enclosed arena or the old arena with flippers banned (and maybe a very small increase to wall height since imo the walls are way too short for IF HW)

other that that, are we good with using the gtmcs 2 arena? or would you prefer a different one?

429
Tournament Archives / Re: gtmcs 3?
« on: January 30, 2019, 08:59:15 PM »
I'd like to see the use of a RW series 7 format, everyone has 4 entries, and seeded robots do not count towards the 4 entries (16 seeds will be chosen by the top 16 of GTMCS2) and if we hit more than 128 entries, we will have qualifier rounds.
cringe & bluepilled. what you're describing sounds like you want gtmcs to become a chinese knockoff of OW

I'm down for another GTMCS. Personally I'd prefer just straight up the same straight double elim format as the last one but executed in a more timely manner. To me a heat/group format just doesn't seem right for an "official" tourney.

Gotta have all 3 of the main metas represented in my mind too, since this is meant to represent all of GTM.

Don't agree with allowing multiple entries either. 1 or maybe 2 in each meta seems about right to me. Force people to narrow down to their best rather than reentering the same old sh** we've seen 45 times before in other tournies.
based & billypilled. agreed on the current format

I can host irl part
I have clinical depression
same
Double Elimination is the simplest approach that makes sure people don't get quickly taken out by my generic 36hs. It also brings back memories to the BBEANS generation. I would prefer this overall.

Heats have worked generally work on tournament style TV shows because you get a lot of content/contestants in and out. But the system is not fair to people who get bad draws. To fix that you either lot of fairly applied wildcard spots or you a large, time-consuming, Frankenstein formats akin to what was seen in the Robot Wars reboot.

Something really unique would be a system based off of some North American (and Australian) sports. You have a "group stage" with 8 groups of 8. You earn points based on how you win your fights and the top robot(s) from each group advance to a championship tournament. The twist is that instead of a generic round-robin some extra matches will be held between members of different groups. In my view, those last matches are more dramatic because they’re each affecting two groups.
sounds way too complex for both the host and the average viewer tbh

I mean, if nothing else, I might be able to chip in and offer a hand.  Maybe with at least one section of the tourney.

Also, this is more a suggestion, I get diversity is nice and all, but should we at least try all metas with just a HW weightclass?  It's probably the most popular weightclass, it's simple for hosts, could provide some entertaining matches, and give the builder a good amount of freedom in design to be honest.
all 3 metas will probably end up as HW since the only remaining weightclass for the stock/IF divisions is HW, and IRL really isn't that popular below HW (not counting CW).

If people want to vote on the weightclasses, then I'm cool with that as well. although i do feel that HW would be the best for all three metas involved

retooled bracket pls
delete retooled and your account

The arena to be used is still up in the air. One idea I had was to use a different arena for each meta to help certain bot types in stock and If.

430
Tournament Archives / gtmcs 3?
« on: January 30, 2019, 03:38:28 PM »
Well, it can't get any worse can it?

So title topic says it all. Post your thoughts and ideas on a potential GTMCS 3.

If it does happen this year then I think we can all agree that we should have multiple hosts from the start of the tournament. I do have a fee people who offered to host the next GTMCS, but idk if those offers are still valid.

Personally I hope we can find a working system for GTMCS. The last one was the largest tournament in GTM's recent history

431
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: the fries are back
« on: January 28, 2019, 05:51:34 AM »
I just want to say that taco bell's tacos are honestly the worst thing they serve. Quesadillas and the loaded grilles are the bomb though

432
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: The General Chatter Thread.
« on: January 25, 2019, 03:53:01 AM »
man going through the old posts in this thread is great. almost feels bad that I remember a lot of the sh** posted here

good times

433
Site News and Feedback / New Mod
« on: January 24, 2019, 06:28:24 PM »
congratulations to plerco on becoming our newest glomod???

good for him though. you zoomers better behave

also, i guess we have a actual reputation system in place once again. place your bets on how long it will take for the first flame war over rep

434
Stock Showcases / Re: RedAce's Stock Showcase
« on: January 23, 2019, 11:51:56 PM »
this the setup?


24hs are cool tho. really should be the max allowed for a hw hs tbh.

436
Site News and Feedback / Re: New Showcase mods
« on: January 22, 2019, 03:29:59 PM »
Thanks.

Edit : errr, little hiccup. I'm not a mod in the DSL showcase section, strangely enough. can someone please fix it ?
done

437
Tutorials and Tips / Re: Making OBJ bots
« on: January 20, 2019, 07:52:26 PM »
you should've said that 86+ faces can cause the game to crash if a bot takes a control board hit. technically you can make bots for show over the face limit, but youre kind of giving people the wrong message that's gonna make tournaments even more of a hassle to run

438
Site News and Feedback / New Showcase mods
« on: January 20, 2019, 04:48:04 AM »
We would like to welcome  to pokebro14 to the staff team as our new showcase moderator. 

also

per request, Naryar has retired from glomod to a position as showcase mod.

439
Site News and Feedback / Re: New admins
« on: January 19, 2019, 09:39:15 PM »
can i humbly ask for showcase moderator position ? i like the showcases. if i can do my part to keep them reasonably ordered, you can count on me.
both members i asked said no... so sure

try to stay active for more than a week this time

440
Tournament Archives / Re: GTM Open Event
« on: January 18, 2019, 11:25:58 PM »
https://gametechmods.com/forums/multi-entry-signups/gtm-open-event/

literally just had to check the signups section

Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ... 82