Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Badger

Pages: 1 ... 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 [95] 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 ... 308
1881
Tournament Archives / Re: The Forge - Wedges-Be-Gone | Discussion
« on: November 26, 2016, 09:09:46 AM »
Aight when yugi decides to READ MY GODDAMN PM we should be moving to signups, get those bots ready my dudes

1882
Hey, I really like the look of that. You could mount the drive onto the snapper too to shrink the chassis and get some more weight, but I don't think it's really worth it. Again, great bot!

1883
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Badger's Bots (DSL Showcase)
« on: November 25, 2016, 09:23:22 PM »
I also like it, it's pretty interesting. does it have a name?
Not atm. I called the bot file frum but thats a sh**e name. Aby suggestions?

1884
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Badger's Bots (DSL Showcase)
« on: November 25, 2016, 07:57:54 PM »

Did I IRL right? Its a flipper, AND ALSO A DRUM. 790-something kg, pixel-sized chassis

1885
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
« on: November 25, 2016, 01:59:19 PM »
hmm. i see this flame war has calmed down. well, LRA2 started it, so he gets a warning for flaming.
LUL

1886
Stock Showcases / Re: The Bacon Bowl (Stock)
« on: November 25, 2016, 09:50:26 AM »
Hey, that's not too bad for a very-first bot.

http://beetlebros.gametechmods.com/ra2techs.htm#basic - Read this, it's a catch-all for new builders.

You should use the blue snappers instead of the green, since they're lighter. You should try to use only 2 drive motors and a black battery, also.

1887
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
« on: November 25, 2016, 09:41:03 AM »

1888
Stock Showcases / Re: WenXiangLee Stock Showcase
« on: November 25, 2016, 08:38:23 AM »
You only need 2 snappers. You can use the extra weight to get a proper extender setup on your tribars.

1889
Stock Showcases / Re: WenXiangLee Stock Showcase
« on: November 25, 2016, 08:28:42 AM »
So how many blue snappers did you stack there?

1890
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
« on: November 25, 2016, 08:27:30 AM »
member when there weren't so many foreigners on gtm?
member feeling safe on gtm?
(Image removed from quote.)

Nobody does. It's been multinational forever.
Especially considering dezox is italian last time I checked, because he used to have a AC Milan logo on his sig. He also has talked sh** to craaig in PM's for apparently having ginger hair in a profile.

Go **** yourself, dezox.
can you stop flaming more reputable members Avalanche, thank you.

1891
Tournament Archives / Re: Robotic Murder Party - SBV
« on: November 24, 2016, 12:21:47 PM »

1892
Challenge Board / Re: RA2 CHALLENGE THREAD - DISCUSSIONS
« on: November 23, 2016, 07:49:50 AM »
DSL-STANDARD or irl if you want but I'm gonna make a DSL standard one so :P
1v1
HW
Dsl Tournament arena
No BFE or whatever you use to cheat
Rule of 7 break allowed but nothin else
no cheatbot 2
no SnS or Popups
1v1 me skrub

1893
Tournament Archives / Re: Stilt Stumble
« on: November 23, 2016, 04:46:02 AM »
Top kek id be up for this

1894
You shouldn't listen to Avalanche about anything to do with RA2.
Didn't bother to read your wall of text.

1895
So a ruleset was changed because it wasn't 'muh meta'. Why am i not surprised?
hey guys if i say "muh meta" enough it means i'm right, right?

1896
Not going to enter due to dsl-s. Stand up for what you chose originally wen, if they want a dsl-s tournament they can run it themselves.
DSL 2.2 IRL
I just accidently changed the rules.
thx a lot
You shouldn't listen to Avalanche about anything to do with RA2. Do dsl-s, Wen.

1897
Tournament Archives / Re: The Forge - Wedges-Be-Gone | Discussion
« on: November 22, 2016, 05:47:35 PM »
Alrighty boys we're doing a reboot
-Arena changed to Vaporzone
-SnS banned
-Added poll for bracket type

Thoughts?

1898
Challenge Board / Re: An idea to overhaul the challenge board system:
« on: November 22, 2016, 05:22:07 PM »
That's my point, that should be implemented in my opinion. As you say, want the title? Earn it. Learn to build.
My bad, misread your post. I think that the current rules say the same as you proposed, but he found a loophole by only agreeing to a ridculous non-competitive ruleset.

1899
Challenge Board / Re: An idea to overhaul the challenge board system:
« on: November 22, 2016, 05:16:03 PM »
But no-one is forcing IRL builders to then play DSL-S. There are plenty of IRL tournaments coming and going that they can enter, instead.
But it would unfairly restrict them from being able to challenge a DSL-S DSL Champion, and vice versa.
No it wouldn't. Want a title, learn how to build.
If title holder rejects a challenge they should lose the title to the challenger by default. End of.
Didn't happen when I challenged lra2

1900
Challenge Board / Re: An idea to overhaul the challenge board system:
« on: November 22, 2016, 11:56:59 AM »
I'm of the opinion that IRL is as deserving of a title as any other category and shouldn't just be a beauty contest. A shocking concept to some, and honestly the best argument that IRL should have a title, is Badger saying it shouldn't.
If the arguement is about potential reorganising of these titles, I personally think these 5 make the most sense:

Stock
DSL-S
DSL-IRL
Irongforge
Retooled
You realise that an IRL title will just be whoever makes the wedgiest flipper thats barely IRL-legal, right (maybe whoever can spam the most mechavore discs while claiming IRL)? And there will  be flame wars over the borderline-legal bots? Trying to build the most efficient IRL bot defeats the purpose, at that point you may as well go play DSL-S.

Pages: 1 ... 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 [95] 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 ... 308