1881
Tournament Archives / Re: The Forge - Wedges-Be-Gone | Discussion
« on: November 26, 2016, 09:09:46 AM »
Aight when yugi decides to READ MY GODDAMN PM we should be moving to signups, get those bots ready my dudes
|
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1881
Tournament Archives / Re: The Forge - Wedges-Be-Gone | Discussion« on: November 26, 2016, 09:09:46 AM »
Aight when yugi decides to READ MY GODDAMN PM we should be moving to signups, get those bots ready my dudes
1882
Stock Showcases / Re: DemonOfTomorrow's Stock Death Machines (and other stuffs)« on: November 26, 2016, 08:53:09 AM »
Hey, I really like the look of that. You could mount the drive onto the snapper too to shrink the chassis and get some more weight, but I don't think it's really worth it. Again, great bot!
1883
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Badger's Bots (DSL Showcase)« on: November 25, 2016, 09:23:22 PM »I also like it, it's pretty interesting. does it have a name?Not atm. I called the bot file frum but thats a sh**e name. Aby suggestions? 1884
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Badger's Bots (DSL Showcase)« on: November 25, 2016, 07:57:54 PM »![]() Did I IRL right? Its a flipper, AND ALSO A DRUM. 790-something kg, pixel-sized chassis 1885
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!« on: November 25, 2016, 01:59:19 PM »hmm. i see this flame war has calmed down. well, LRA2 started it, so he gets a warning for flaming.LUL 1886
Stock Showcases / Re: The Bacon Bowl (Stock)« on: November 25, 2016, 09:50:26 AM »
Hey, that's not too bad for a very-first bot.
http://beetlebros.gametechmods.com/ra2techs.htm#basic - Read this, it's a catch-all for new builders. You should use the blue snappers instead of the green, since they're lighter. You should try to use only 2 drive motors and a black battery, also. 1888
Stock Showcases / Re: WenXiangLee Stock Showcase« on: November 25, 2016, 08:38:23 AM »
You only need 2 snappers. You can use the extra weight to get a proper extender setup on your tribars.
1889
Stock Showcases / Re: WenXiangLee Stock Showcase« on: November 25, 2016, 08:28:42 AM »
So how many blue snappers did you stack there?
1890
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!« on: November 25, 2016, 08:27:30 AM »can you stop flaming more reputable members Avalanche, thank you.Especially considering dezox is italian last time I checked, because he used to have a AC Milan logo on his sig. He also has talked sh** to craaig in PM's for apparently having ginger hair in a profile.member when there weren't so many foreigners on gtm? 1892
Challenge Board / Re: RA2 CHALLENGE THREAD - DISCUSSIONS« on: November 23, 2016, 07:49:50 AM »DSL-STANDARD or irl if you want but I'm gonna make a DSL standard one so :P1v1 me skrub 1893
Tournament Archives / Re: Stilt Stumble« on: November 23, 2016, 04:46:02 AM »
Top kek id be up for this
1894
Tournament Archives / Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion« on: November 23, 2016, 04:25:27 AM »You shouldn't listen to Avalanche about anything to do with RA2.Didn't bother to read your wall of text. 1895
Tournament Archives / Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion« on: November 23, 2016, 03:14:00 AM »So a ruleset was changed because it wasn't 'muh meta'. Why am i not surprised?hey guys if i say "muh meta" enough it means i'm right, right? 1896
Tournament Archives / Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion« on: November 23, 2016, 02:31:19 AM »You shouldn't listen to Avalanche about anything to do with RA2. Do dsl-s, Wen.Not going to enter due to dsl-s. Stand up for what you chose originally wen, if they want a dsl-s tournament they can run it themselves.DSL 2.2 IRLI just accidently changed the rules. 1897
Tournament Archives / Re: The Forge - Wedges-Be-Gone | Discussion« on: November 22, 2016, 05:47:35 PM »
Alrighty boys we're doing a reboot
-Arena changed to Vaporzone -SnS banned -Added poll for bracket type Thoughts? 1898
Challenge Board / Re: An idea to overhaul the challenge board system:« on: November 22, 2016, 05:22:07 PM »That's my point, that should be implemented in my opinion. As you say, want the title? Earn it. Learn to build.My bad, misread your post. I think that the current rules say the same as you proposed, but he found a loophole by only agreeing to a ridculous non-competitive ruleset. 1899
Challenge Board / Re: An idea to overhaul the challenge board system:« on: November 22, 2016, 05:16:03 PM »No it wouldn't. Want a title, learn how to build.But no-one is forcing IRL builders to then play DSL-S. There are plenty of IRL tournaments coming and going that they can enter, instead.But it would unfairly restrict them from being able to challenge a DSL-S DSL Champion, and vice versa. If title holder rejects a challenge they should lose the title to the challenger by default. End of.Didn't happen when I challenged lra2 1900
Challenge Board / Re: An idea to overhaul the challenge board system:« on: November 22, 2016, 11:56:59 AM »I'm of the opinion that IRL is as deserving of a title as any other category and shouldn't just be a beauty contest. A shocking concept to some, and honestly the best argument that IRL should have a title, is Badger saying it shouldn't.You realise that an IRL title will just be whoever makes the wedgiest flipper thats barely IRL-legal, right (maybe whoever can spam the most mechavore discs while claiming IRL)? And there will be flame wars over the borderline-legal bots? Trying to build the most efficient IRL bot defeats the purpose, at that point you may as well go play DSL-S. |