Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Badger

Pages: 1 ... 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 [75] 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 ... 308
1481
Tournament Archives / Re: MASTERS OF DISASTER - SIGNUPS
« on: February 27, 2017, 09:08:29 AM »
TIL Kurt doesn't know how to DSL-S

1482
Custom Components Showcase / Re: The Bacon Bowl (Retooled)
« on: February 27, 2017, 04:57:56 AM »
I think you went a bit overboard on the armour panels in the back

1483
DSL TC Showcases / Re: The Bacon Bowl (DSL)
« on: February 27, 2017, 04:47:25 AM »
I think it would be a lot nicer if you moved the drive motors up one or two ticks, to reduce the ground clearance. You didn't exactly take a flattering screenshot either :P

1484
Tournament Archives / Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« on: February 27, 2017, 03:02:52 AM »

1485
Tournament Archives / Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« on: February 27, 2017, 02:36:46 AM »
So the 3 burst flipper defeats the enemy team because they all didn't have wedges.
What a ****ing surprise. Greatest robot of all time, clearly. /s

Not sure why Badger's too proud of himself for making this travesty.

:>

Don't worry about kix's 3 burst flipper, or the fact that it got outwedged by a static wedge.

Maybe if you understood that I only used 3 bursts in order to get the proper width for the flipping plate, and that the number of bursts is literally 100% irrelevant anyway, you wouldn't be so salty.

1486
Tournament Archives / Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« on: February 26, 2017, 06:14:50 PM »
Just sent my rumble line up, let's see who wins now in bizarro world.

Quote
There IS something wrong with a  2 Moros blades stacked in each other, however.

What I saw, they weren't stacked, rather placed right next to each other...
I dunno how 09 interpreted "stapled together" as "stacked inside each other", but yeah, all I did was make the bar thicker, I didn't think it would be this big a deal
Sorry man, my bad. I thought by stapled you mean't stacked, plus it looked only one bar thick to me, guess I have bad eyes or something.



I have a response that beats all arguments here, but for the sake of ending the argument and avoiding a ban, i'll shut up. But don't take this as any confirmation of you "winning" the argument, take this as me being held back.
You should give us that response since you haven't said anything remotely convincing yet  :dumb)

Anyway thanks for the tournament Gulden; neat mechanic and very fast uploads. Hopefully we get light vs dark pt. 2 at some point!

1487
Tournament Archives / Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« on: February 26, 2017, 01:14:07 PM »
> Implying you're a better tournament host than Gulden
Challenge Accepted.
hahahaahahha
oh my god dude, you're so mad that you lost

1488
Tournament Archives / Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« on: February 26, 2017, 12:12:13 PM »
> Implying you're a better tournament host than Gulden

1489
Tournament Archives / Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« on: February 26, 2017, 11:39:18 AM »
Yeah you shouldn't host an IRL tournament if you don't know what IRL means.
Good to know that you'll never host an IRL tournament then :>

1490
Tournament Archives / Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« on: February 26, 2017, 08:02:27 AM »
Not gonna quote because nobody wants to read that garbage twice.

All I'm gonna say is that having 3 separate hammer arms isn't IRL, at least in the way baconus presented it. Having 3 actual burst motors is fine in my book, because RA2 doesn't allow for a single burst to be powerful enough for IRL standards. Also, if I had wanted Paladin just to be tryhard broken I would've given it hitler-style wedges that weren't ass, made it 2WD with not terrible drive motors and saved a ton of weight on unnessecary armour etc. It's supposed to be tank inspired - slow but with heavy armour and a powerful weapon. Hopefully that design inspiration comes across in the bot's aesthetics.

Let's be honest, you're only crying about it because you lost to it.

And NeonCalypso's bot is better than yours :>

1491
Tournament Archives / Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« on: February 25, 2017, 08:30:55 PM »
Holy sh** the dark team tears are delicious. Why are you all (by which I mean some of you) so damn salty?
Right: I dispute the Solaris VS MITP decision. I'd like somebody who was notguldenflame to rejudge the fight, preferably a tournament mod.

Why? Because I honestly don't feel like it's a good idea to have the tournament host act as judge when his robot is in the tournament, and especially when he's picked a side to be on. And this has happened before: Yugitom made judges decisions for Pangolin's fights during Death Battle because DemonOfTomorrow was the builder of Pangolin and the host of Death Battle simultaneously.
(Image removed from quote.)
You didn't seem to have a problem when he literally judged his own one sided fight against Jungle Fever and nobody else on your team has a problem with the result, seems like someone is a bit bootyblasted that they are now losing after all the sh** talking he was doing earlier and have his strategy E X P O S E D. (Image removed from quote.)
Firstly, my sh**talking has been labelled as intentional and playing up to the fact I'm in Team Dark. You on the other hand are just trying to get a ride out of me and get me banned. Yeah, no.. And no, I didn't, because there was no point in disputing it, and I expected most fights to be straight knock outs or ootas if paladin was involved, and I've mostly been right in that assumption. Also, he's already accepted I've made a valid point, so perhaps it might be a good idea to quiet down, especially after I ceased sh**talking once the situation got worse, which just leaves you as the arrogant one especially considering I planned ahead and informed everyone that I was playing up the natural villain role because of being a Team Dark member, and ensured that people realised I wasn't being personal about it. You talk about game being "bootyblasted" but you try to mock me with anime images and seem to take a personal issue with the not-actually-hating-the-enemy sh**-talking. Let's put it this way: people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Il leave it at that, as I need some sleep for once.

Aggression: What ratio? It's literally how many hits did each bot do? just ****ing count em.
Ratio is amount of hits.  68 hits for solaris is pretty much definite, however, I didn't really know how to count the wedging of MitP.

I'm personally ok with a re-judging.  This was really close.

Besides, if I'll rig anything, I usually do it so I'll lose.  Back in WCR, I rigged it so BattleBreaker didn't win against Blizzard in the rumble, so rng didn't decide the winner.
Thanks for not throwing a sh**fit at my dispute.
Didn't read your essay explanations, but if you seriously think that the robot that sustained no damage lost to the bot which lost its weapon and a wheel, you're deluded.

1492
Tournament Archives / Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« on: February 25, 2017, 05:25:00 PM »

Agreed. 3 bursts, and they are all at max arcs. The hinges are less of an issue imo, I mainly have issue with skirt sheets.

Says the guy with 3 overhead spinners on his team, and a bot with nothing but hinges on his team.

Before you go and try and slam our Team Captain for factors outside his control, how about you consider the fact that it was you who set up the luck-based system that led to 3 overhead spinners being on our team, and it was you who accepted CS, despite either knowing that it was over powered, or failing to test it properly to see if it was overpowered. Oh, and there's nothing un-IRL about overhead spinners, mate. There IS something wrong with a 3 piston flipper however.


Blame Gulden for allowing it. Also, it's a fairly cool idea, and spikestrips aren't that durable, and you saw it get outwedged and flipped about the place by Paladin.
ITT: Children getting salty that my bot is sh**canning their entire team.  :laughing

Cry about the flail ram before you start whinging about the powerful flipper. ty.

1493
Tournament Archives / Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« on: February 24, 2017, 10:49:42 PM »

1494
Tournament Archives / Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« on: February 22, 2017, 11:25:49 AM »
> 2 votes for 090901 as capt
Idk if you saw what he entered, but for some reason I have a hunch that hes not gonna take it seriously

1495
the concept of irony is lost on asbestosstar
what if he's just a prototype ai develoed by google

I am not.


In other news Kody hasn't been confirmed arc since Feb 7. I hope he leaves. Like he did on his website.
that's something a SYNTH would say

1496
What actually happened:
He wanked into a sock while looking at these girl's Facebook profiles, and cried.

1497
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: My new computer
« on: February 15, 2017, 09:09:15 PM »
You must have a 480 and dont play in a group like he does!
I've owned 2 480s, and I currently own a 1080. Computer hardware is kinda my thing. I know what I'm bullsh**ting about.

1498
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: My new computer
« on: February 15, 2017, 09:06:37 PM »
> Pays extra for unlocked K cpu
> Buys motherboard that doesn't support overclocking
???

And you should've got an AMD RX480 instead of a GTX1060 tbh

I will have you know!



That you may be right, I have no damn idea .... my oldtimers kicked in about 5-6 years ago i I don't think like I used to, BUT, my young game playing computer guru said that I should spend the extra $50 for the 1060 over the RX480 because it is worth the extra $$$$

ppppppppppptttttttttttttttttt!!!!!!!!!

bite me! .... NO DON'T BITE ....  I like it gentle now in my old age!
You should tell your young game playing guru that he's a mentally deficient fanboy, the 1060 and 480 are very, very similar in speed, with the 480 being faster in newer games.


H170 boards can't overclock, Z170 boards can. The only reason to get a K CPU is because it has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

1499
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: My new computer
« on: February 15, 2017, 08:48:20 PM »
> Pays extra for unlocked K cpu
> Buys motherboard that doesn't support overclocking
???

And you should've got an AMD RX480 instead of a GTX1060 tbh

1500
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: Political Compass Thread
« on: February 14, 2017, 12:16:55 PM »
hurting someone's feelings != crime
http://injury.findlaw.com/torts-and-personal-injuries/intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress.html

"...the actor must intend to cause severe emotional distress or know that severe emotional distress is likely to occur."

Get to the point where life is going so badly wrong that you'd rather end your own existence than suffer through another day: Not a victim.

This isn't really what I meant.

David Mitchell said a great thing about timorous and reckless people on WILTY. He said warnings are put in place in order to create order for the reckless people. However, that leaves the timorous ones in a state of 'perpetual terror'. So, I think that, even though rehab is very good and should be used with prisoners, I do believe punishment should exist as a deterrent to even commit any crime. So, in the end, in theory, all the timorous people won't even consider committing a crime, whilst the reckless ones are significantly deterred.

This is why i said some but not all. Was simply stating that punishment wasn't the only or best answer.
I should've said IMO. I'm fully aware that hurting someone's feefees can be a criminal offense. I think that that is really stupid, even in extreme cases.

Pages: 1 ... 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 [75] 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 ... 308