Author Topic: Ideas for new Robot Combat Game (Read 32719 times)

Pwnator · « **Reply #160 on:** December 15, 2009, 04:05:03 AM »

I wonder what Mad edited from that post. o_O

Naryar · « **Reply #161 on:** December 15, 2009, 04:16:57 AM »

Exact same here...

JoeBlo · « **Reply #162 on:** December 15, 2009, 05:03:47 AM »

the size of the whole posts font was previously all in size 36

Also nar is it not easier to tell us when your n00b sense isnt tingling :P

makalelerr · « **Reply #163 on:** May 21, 2010, 01:19:40 PM »

There are various ideas

Squirrel_Monkey · « **Reply #164 on:** May 21, 2010, 01:26:47 PM »

Eh?
BUMP?
WTH?

Psydia · « **Reply #165 on:** May 23, 2010, 01:47:53 PM »

A nail punch would be cool :)

[I suggest to everyone who are seriously interested in making a robot combat game "better than RA2" and want this game to be highly customizable and, of course, full of glitches, use Source engine (Garry's Mod!)+3DSMax combination.]

Serge · « **Reply #166 on:** May 24, 2010, 11:37:07 AM »

No, the Source engine won't cut it. The physics are way too glitchy.

Psydia · « **Reply #167 on:** May 24, 2010, 02:28:51 PM »

I thought it would be great to have a game with a full of glitches physics engine xD
Another alternative= Unreal Engine 3 (UDK) + Blender
Another= Unity3D + 3DSMax + Blender
These got nice physics and low glitches but Source may allow players to make interesting robot designs. And of course, no cheating will make up a very competitive gaming experience.

Serge · « **Reply #168 on:** May 24, 2010, 02:32:15 PM »

Quote from: LANParty on May 24, 2010, 02:28:51 PM

Another alternative= Unreal Engine 3 (UDK) + Blender

Jadestone's trying to make it.

Quote from: LANParty on May 24, 2010, 02:28:51 PM

Another= Unity3D + 3DSMax + Blender

We went through this a hundred of times.

Quote from: LANParty on May 24, 2010, 02:28:51 PM

These got nice physics

Fffs, how many times will I have to repeat - a simple rigid body engine ain't gonna cut it, the we will be able to get is RA2 all over again.

Noodle · « **Reply #169 on:** May 24, 2010, 08:59:47 PM »

Quote from: Serge on May 24, 2010, 11:37:07 AM

No, the Source engine won't cut it. The physics are way too glitchy.

I think source is going to get a major update with the advent of Portal 2. I think they may be more focussed on visuals (dynamic lighting support) but I'm just putting it out there.

GroudonRobotWars · « **Reply #170 on:** May 25, 2010, 05:50:43 PM »

I would like to see a rumble like in battlebots in a new robot combat game

Naryar · « **Reply #171 on:** May 26, 2010, 02:59:48 AM »

There are rumbles already !

But 10 bots in an arena = lagfest

Jonzu95 · « **Reply #172 on:** May 26, 2010, 03:01:52 AM »

6 would be cool. (Annihilators)

Naryar · « **Reply #173 on:** May 26, 2010, 03:06:17 AM »

Yeah get 6 HWs on a rumble and tell me how your processor and RAM likes it...

Jonzu95 · « **Reply #174 on:** May 26, 2010, 03:09:06 AM »

I think that it will enjoy of it.

JoeBlo · « **Reply #175 on:** May 26, 2010, 03:11:38 AM »

coming from the person who said building and UHW was to much lag :P

Naryar · « **Reply #176 on:** May 26, 2010, 03:19:17 AM »

He's just too lazy to build a somehow logical 5000kg assembly of components.

(They are quite hard to build though unless you exactly know what your design will be)

JoeBlo · « **Reply #177 on:** May 26, 2010, 03:29:21 AM »

or your going for most flamethrowers you can possibly fit on before the game no longer allows them to work :P

Naryar · « **Reply #178 on:** May 26, 2010, 03:37:17 AM »

Should i build an UHW flamethrower SnS ? Or not ?

And who broke that record anyways ? Was it 123 or you ?

JoeBlo · « **Reply #179 on:** May 26, 2010, 03:45:42 AM »

I made a 100 one.. then 123 also made a 100 one so I made a 150 one then got bored with it.. the flamethrowers don't work with that many due to the way the game operates