Author Topic: New Glitch - Hax Mode (Read 42195 times)

Gazea2 · « **Reply #140 on:** July 02, 2011, 01:59:50 PM »

I agree. R4 was and still is a good bot.

NFX · « **Reply #141 on:** July 02, 2011, 02:20:55 PM »

R0B0 brings up an excellent point. Sage and Scrap already said there are limitations with this glitch, and it'll still require some degree of skill to actually apply it to an effective design.

Gazea2 · « **Reply #142 on:** July 02, 2011, 02:22:44 PM »

Quote from: NFX on July 02, 2011, 02:20:55 PM

R0B0 brings up an excellent point. Sage and Scrap already said there are limitations with this glitch, and it'll still require some degree of skill to actually apply it to an effective design.

Then I'm confused as to why they're worried that it'll break stock. If it needs some skill, a newbie won't be able to come along and make an awesome bot, will they?

ty4er · « **Reply #143 on:** July 02, 2011, 02:34:46 PM »

Most chassis' will just be a box with not much thought behind it IMO.

russian roulette · « **Reply #144 on:** July 02, 2011, 03:00:45 PM »

Quote from: ty4er on July 02, 2011, 02:34:46 PM

Most chassis' will just be a box with not much thought behind it IMO.

So are most DSL robots (Specifically of the SNS type and VS type)

ty4er · « **Reply #145 on:** July 02, 2011, 03:16:24 PM »

Quote from: russian roulette on July 02, 2011, 03:00:45 PM

Quote from: ty4er on July 02, 2011, 02:34:46 PM
Most chassis' will just be a box with not much thought behind it IMO.
So are most DSL robots (Specifically of the SNS type and VS type)

Ah, they have to be the right size for everything needed to fit in so they do have thought behind them :P
But in stock they would just have to be a certain size and you could put nearly anything you wanted in there without re-sizing or whatever.

Virus Bomb · « **Reply #146 on:** July 02, 2011, 03:20:13 PM »

hey sage how much more difficult would you say this glitch is compared to snapper loading?

Scrap Daddy · « **Reply #147 on:** July 02, 2011, 03:22:00 PM »

haha right on par

Dexterhunter · « **Reply #148 on:** July 02, 2011, 03:24:29 PM »

I've came across this glitch maybe a few times ever since I played Robot Arena 2. I was recently (as in this year, which is weird in of itself) making a robot: everything was progressing as normal, then I...

Then the next thing I knew was that I was able to stack everything into each other.

Only a few select people should be worthy of being taught this; not something that the mass public should know

Scorpion · « **Reply #149 on:** July 02, 2011, 03:25:01 PM »

Quote from: ty4er on July 02, 2011, 03:16:24 PM

Quote from: russian roulette on July 02, 2011, 03:00:45 PM
Quote from: ty4er on July 02, 2011, 02:34:46 PM
Most chassis' will just be a box with not much thought behind it IMO.
So are most DSL robots (Specifically of the SNS type and VS type)
Ah, they have to be the right size for everything needed to fit in so they do have thought behind them :P
But in stock they would just have to be a certain size and you could put nearly anything you wanted in there without re-sizing or whatever.

EH?
Have you even played stock!

ty4er · « **Reply #150 on:** July 02, 2011, 03:27:59 PM »

Quote from: Scorpion on July 02, 2011, 03:25:01 PM

Quote from: ty4er on July 02, 2011, 03:16:24 PM
Quote from: russian roulette on July 02, 2011, 03:00:45 PM
Quote from: ty4er on July 02, 2011, 02:34:46 PM
Most chassis' will just be a box with not much thought behind it IMO.
So are most DSL robots (Specifically of the SNS type and VS type)
Ah, they have to be the right size for everything needed to fit in so they do have thought behind them :P
But in stock they would just have to be a certain size and you could put nearly anything you wanted in there without re-sizing or whatever.
EH?
Have you even played stock!

...no :P

Serge · « **Reply #151 on:** July 02, 2011, 03:33:27 PM »

Wow, nice job.

ACAMS · « **Reply #152 on:** July 02, 2011, 03:53:12 PM »

Quote from: System32 on July 02, 2011, 09:59:50 AM

Nothing kills faster than ignorance and secrecy.

I knew how to AAM years before the public, and we all voted to keep that secret way back then, but now axle loading makes it impossible to tell AAM if it was used.
We don't say "NO AXLE LOADING" in tournaments, but should!

It is their secret..........they can tell us if they want to, but if they use it, THEY MUST SHOW HOW IT IS DONE, or it will be called BFE and deemed illegal!

I guess all tournament bots will have to be inspected with apanx bot exporter to see if superstacking was used....or BFE

123savethewhales · « **Reply #153 on:** July 02, 2011, 04:01:16 PM »

how would apanx bot exporter detect BFE? I mean all it really c is rather or not things are properly "connected".

I just don't see how it can tell the difference between super-stacking or not.

System32 · « **Reply #154 on:** July 02, 2011, 04:59:22 PM »

Quote from: ty4er on July 02, 2011, 03:27:59 PM

Quote from: Scorpion on July 02, 2011, 03:25:01 PM
Quote from: ty4er on July 02, 2011, 03:16:24 PM
Quote from: russian roulette on July 02, 2011, 03:00:45 PM
Quote from: ty4er on July 02, 2011, 02:34:46 PM
Most chassis' will just be a box with not much thought behind it IMO.
So are most DSL robots (Specifically of the SNS type and VS type)
Ah, they have to be the right size for everything needed to fit in so they do have thought behind them :P
But in stock they would just have to be a certain size and you could put nearly anything you wanted in there without re-sizing or whatever.
EH?
Have you even played stock!
...no :P

Then don't post here. I don't argue details on Fetus in fetu. Why? I know jack sh**. I havent learned it or studied it. You haven't touched stock. Get out of this thread. It is something affecting stock only.

ACAMS · « **Reply #155 on:** July 02, 2011, 06:06:51 PM »

Quote from: 123savethewhales on July 02, 2011, 04:01:16 PM

how would apanx bot exporter detect BFE? I mean all it really c is rather or not things are properly "connected".

I just don't see how it can tell the difference between super-stacking or not.

If it has 3 black batteries in one spot, then BFE, AAM or superstacking was used. The exporter will tell you how many parts are in one spot.

Meganerdbomb · « **Reply #156 on:** July 02, 2011, 06:40:45 PM »

I remember when AAM was a huge secret that only the "vets" knew, then someone else figured it out and let the cat out of the bag, and oh yeah, nothing happened. It'll be the same with this.

Somebody · « **Reply #157 on:** July 02, 2011, 06:56:51 PM »

Here's how I see it.

IF it is released, it will help a new kind a building happen, not the death. noobs will still be noobs, with their square extenders, RAD powered heavyweights, and battle axes (BATTLE AXES WOOOOOO). Stacking won't help that.
It will bring in new types of tournaments
1. The usual Stock type tournaments, with no superstacking.
2. Stock tournaments where superstacking can be used in only a realistic manner (where a AP can be put inside a DDT to place a ramplate where it could be put IRL
3. All out, fight to the death superstacking tournaments, providing a jolt to stock
I would love superstacking tournaments lol. Of course everything would be chosen by the host.

Now for all of you that are worried about abuse, have I got a solution for you...
A treaty!!!
Wtf does a treaty have to do with anything??? you ask.
After the glitch is released and we have the new tournaments, we can write up a little thing and pin it to the top of the tournaments forum. Everybody agrees to it if they want to compete in any normal Stock tournaments (1st example above). If they are ever caught with superstacking, they are banned from all stock tournaments FOR LIFE. No exceptions.

An trust me guys, a popup wouldn't work in a tiny little chassis. Superstacking wouldn't be the end of all originality.

EDIT: Foul language removed....user warned

EDIT2: I love how my warning said "Did somebody forget that foul language is not allowed in the main forum?"
Its so third-persony =D

Virus Bomb · « **Reply #158 on:** July 02, 2011, 07:21:32 PM »

Quote from: ACAMS on July 02, 2011, 06:06:51 PM

If it has 3 black batteries in one spot, then BFE, AAM or superstacking was used.

No, it's possible to stack 3 blacks without BFE, AAM, or superstacking. If it was like 4-5 blacks and a control board stacked then someone probably AAM, BFE, etc.

ACAMS · « **Reply #159 on:** July 02, 2011, 07:26:45 PM »

Most games/computers only allow one black and the control board....ANYWAY.....there needs to be rules in place RIGHT NOW about that sort of stuff, and another way to stack, IS JUST ANOTHER WAY TO STACK!

So it does not matter if they tell or not, but if ~~somebody~~ (not the foul language guy) ANYBODY else discovers it and tells....they will get the credit!