Author Topic: BattleBots/The Tourney of Awesomeness (BattleBots wins vote) (Read 22523 times)

GroudonRobotWars · « **Reply #100 on:** April 24, 2011, 08:32:59 PM »

I think I see a Pony reference in the Ring Arena.

freeziez · « **Reply #101 on:** May 29, 2011, 09:18:32 AM »

Bump

Edited the LB arena (honestly, it sucked) into something more pleasing.

Took out the "no more than 6 weapon components" rule out too, it was pointless.

Hope you guys vote for me!

freeziez · « **Reply #102 on:** June 13, 2011, 06:04:38 PM »

Bump

Poll added, which will you choose?

Preytor_4 · « **Reply #103 on:** June 13, 2011, 08:46:58 PM »

Quote from: freeziez on May 29, 2011, 09:18:32 AM

Bump

Edited the LB arena (honestly, it sucked) into something more pleasing.

Change the WB while you at it.

JoeBlo · « **Reply #104 on:** June 13, 2011, 09:56:35 PM »

Minor league size limit is 16 entrants.. just so you know now..

freeziez · « **Reply #105 on:** June 14, 2011, 09:05:32 AM »

Quote from: JoeBlo on June 13, 2011, 09:56:35 PM

Minor league size limit is 16 entrants.. just so you know now..

OK, I'll change that bit.

Updated arena will come soon.

(edit): It's up.

lloopp D lloopp · « **Reply #106 on:** June 14, 2011, 12:31:35 PM »

I'd still prefer a stock Battlebots tbh.

GoldenFox93 · « **Reply #107 on:** June 14, 2011, 12:32:14 PM »

Quote from: lloopp D lloopp on June 14, 2011, 12:31:35 PM

I'd still prefer a stock Battlebots tbh.

Not so good for making uber-realistic robots, however.

As is the weight- any chance of it becoming DSL HW, mate? :P

Squirrel_Monkey · « **Reply #108 on:** June 14, 2011, 12:42:33 PM »

Wait? No glitches at all? This sucks badly. I use axle loading in nearly all my IRL designs (see my latest DSL bot)

freeziez · « **Reply #109 on:** June 14, 2011, 01:08:22 PM »

Quote from: Squirrel_Monkey on June 14, 2011, 12:42:33 PM

Wait? No glitches at all? This sucks badly. I use axle loading in nearly all my IRL designs (see my latest DSL bot)

Yeah, you're right. I still won't allow BFE and all that though.

GoldenFox93 · « **Reply #110 on:** June 14, 2011, 01:09:19 PM »

Quote from: GoldenFox93 on June 14, 2011, 12:32:14 PM

As is the weight- any chance of it becoming DSL HW, mate? :P

freeziez · « **Reply #111 on:** June 14, 2011, 01:10:35 PM »

Rules tweaked.

Quote from: GoldenFox93 on June 14, 2011, 12:32:14 PM

As is the weight- any chance of it becoming DSL HW, mate? :P

Would you guys rather have it DSL HW?

GoldenFox93 · « **Reply #112 on:** June 14, 2011, 01:11:54 PM »

Quote from: freeziez on June 14, 2011, 01:10:35 PM

Quote from: GoldenFox93 on June 14, 2011, 12:32:14 PM
As is the weight- any chance of it becoming DSL HW, mate? :P

Would you guys rather have it DSL HW?

Yes- personally, I think it'll make the whole "Realistic Robot-building" aspect much easier, and not so much focus on needing an unrealistically tiny chassis.

freeziez · « **Reply #113 on:** June 14, 2011, 01:13:02 PM »

Quote from: GoldenFox93 on June 14, 2011, 01:11:54 PM

Quote from: freeziez on June 14, 2011, 01:10:35 PM
Quote from: GoldenFox93 on June 14, 2011, 12:32:14 PM
As is the weight- any chance of it becoming DSL HW, mate? :P

Would you guys rather have it DSL HW?
Yes- personally, I think it'll make the whole "Realistic Robot-building" aspect much easier, and not so much focus on needing an unrealistically tiny chassis.

OK, I'll change it.

(edit): Changed.

GoldenFox93 · « **Reply #114 on:** June 14, 2011, 01:13:52 PM »

Quote from: freeziez on June 14, 2011, 01:13:02 PM

Quote from: GoldenFox93 on June 14, 2011, 01:11:54 PM
Quote from: freeziez on June 14, 2011, 01:10:35 PM
Quote from: GoldenFox93 on June 14, 2011, 12:32:14 PM
As is the weight- any chance of it becoming DSL HW, mate? :P

Would you guys rather have it DSL HW?
Yes- personally, I think it'll make the whole "Realistic Robot-building" aspect much easier, and not so much focus on needing an unrealistically tiny chassis.

OK, I'll change it.

(edit): Changed.

Ah, that's great. Thank you!

*Goes to build something*

Squirrel_Monkey · « **Reply #115 on:** June 14, 2011, 01:20:26 PM »

Wait, I just built some DSL MWs concepts for this!

freeziez · « **Reply #116 on:** June 14, 2011, 01:22:03 PM »

Quote from: Squirrel_Monkey on June 14, 2011, 01:20:26 PM

Wait, I just built some DSL MWs concepts for this!

I never said multibots weren't allowed. ;D

NFX · « **Reply #117 on:** June 14, 2011, 02:29:28 PM »

Right. But it doesn't have to do the "enter the arena as one" thing.

I'll definitely be trying to concept for this. Might get me building in DSL again after my recent Stock binge.

GroudonRobotWars · « **Reply #118 on:** June 14, 2011, 08:04:10 PM »

Hummmmmm. It does not matter anyway it goes, because I don't think there was any rule against making a pony themed bot it just needs one or two of those sponcers from those packs.

freeziez · « **Reply #119 on:** June 14, 2011, 08:21:37 PM »

Quote from: GroudonRobotWars on June 14, 2011, 08:04:10 PM

Hummmmmm. It does not matter anyway it goes, because I don't think there was any rule against making a pony themed bot it just needs one or two of those sponcers from those packs.

You can make a pony-themed bot, as long as it follows the rules and has a sponsor decal.