Author Topic: Battlebots 5  (Read 38344 times)

Offline freeziez

  • Ultra Heavyweight
  • Posts: 4720
  • Rep: 2
  • He's Mr. White Christmas, he's Mr. Snow...
    • youtube.com/freeziezGTM
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • See profile for gamer tags: Yes
Battlebots 5
« on: November 25, 2011, 02:58:19 PM »


Battlebots is back!

RULES
- DSL LW/MW/HW/SHW
- Battlebox 3.0
- 3 minute matches
- Realistic Rule applies very strongly, IT MUST BE FOLLOWED.
- No NARmour
- 1 Havok restart, 2nd time eliminated
- No BFE, AAM, NCR glitch, or any other glitch that makes the bot unrealistic
- Trov Glitch is allowed, don't abuse it
- Replicas are NOT allowed
- Cannot use DSA (why would you?)
- Robots must look as close to IRL designs as possible. (No unrealistic weapon sizes, disproportionate designs.)
- No face spinners
- Moving weapons may not touch the ground initially. It is OK if a robot is flipped over but not if weapons hit the ground when the match starts.
- Bots with treads get a 60 kg weight cushion.
- MUST have a sponsor decal
(https://gametechmods.com/Robot_Arena2/Misc/AU_Decal_Pack_1.0.zip)
(https://gametechmods.com/Robot_Arena2/Misc/JX_Sponsor_Decals.zip)
- Judge bursts are allowed, but one Judge Burst per bot for LW and MW, two for the HW and SHW divisions.
- No multibots
- No armor attached directly to the chassis of the robot
- LW walkers/shufflers can weigh up to 425 kgs, but at least 175 kgs must be used on the walker or shuffler system itself.
- MW walkers/shufflers can weigh up to 800 kgs, but at least 400 kgs must be used on the walker or shuffler system itself.
- HW walkers/shufflers can weigh up to 1200 kgs, but at least 400 kgs must be used on the walker or shuffler system itself.
- SHW walkers/shufflers can weigh up to 1600 kgs, but at least 400 kgs must be used on the walker or shuffler system itself.
- Cheatbot2 components that are allowed:

JUDGING
- Fights will be judged on significant attacks and control of match.
- Fights will be judged on a spectrum of 45 points.
- Fights will be judged by me, G.K., and SKBT.

ENTRIES

LW
1. Hard Bot
2. NFX
3. smashysmashy
4. Badnik96
5. MassimoV
6. Craaig
7. MikeNCR
8. SKBT
9. Scrap Daddy
10. nicsan2009
11. Pressure
12. Squirrel_Monkey
13. dragonsteincole
14. ty4er
15. Conraaa
16. Powerrave

MW
1. NFX
2. smashysmashy
3. Badnik96
4. Enigma
5. MassimoV
6. Craaig
7. Virus Bomb
8. MikeNCR
9. SKBT
10. Scrap Daddy
11. nicsan2009
12. Preytor_4
13. Pressure
14. Madman3
15. Squirrel_Monkey
16. dragonsteincole

HW
1. NFX
2. Badnik96
3. Enigma
4. MassimoV
5. Craaig
6. Virus Bomb
7. MikeNCR
8. SKBT
9. Jack Daniels
10. Scrap Daddy
11. nicsan2009
12. Preytor_4
13. Madman3
14. Martymidget
15. Russian Roulette
16. Squirrel_Monkey

SHW
1. NFX
2. smashysmashy
3. Badnik96
4. MassimoV
5. Virus Bomb
6. MikeNCR
7. SKBT
8. Scrap Daddy
9. nicsan2009
10. Preytor_4
11. HurricaneAndrew
12. Clickbeetle
13. Enigma
14. Squirrel_Monkey
15. dragonsteincole
16. Conraaa

Green- Accepted and AI'd
Blue- Accepted
Orange- Reserved
Black- Recieved
Red- Problem
« Last Edit: December 11, 2011, 04:55:10 PM by freeziez »
obligatory battlebots 5 comment

GTM Awards 2011

Best Tournament: B4ttlebots (freeziez)
Best New Tournament Host: freeziez
Most Suprising Tournament: B4ttlebots (freeziez)

Offline smashysmashy

  • Posts: 2990
  • Rep: 0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Battlebots 5
« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2011, 03:15:16 PM »
I see it unfair that the seeded people get automatic entry.

Take Urjak. He won many fights by being not really very realistic, and now he gets a reserved place.

Offline Squirrel_Monkey

  • Squirrel_Monkeyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 7587
  • Rep: 7
  • [Insert clever and witty comment here]
    • 0SquirrelMonkey0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Battlebots 5
« Reply #2 on: November 25, 2011, 03:17:23 PM »
I think Trov Glitch should be allowed in a realistic manner.
Also, why not allow cheatbot 2 parts below a certain efficiency. I love the Hworf Spike.
EDIT: And face spinners. Just because of the Garvin incident a perfectly IRL bot type has been outlawed.
Better than GK since 2009.
I think SM is a pretty cool guy, eh builds unicycle-bots and doesn't afraid of anything

Offline GoldenFox93

  • Giga Heavyweight
  • Posts: 12161
  • Rep: -5
  • The Guy
    • http://www.facebook.com/h
    • http://www.youtube.com/ro
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • See profile for gamer tags: Yes
  • Skype: goldenfox93
Re: Battlebots 5
« Reply #3 on: November 25, 2011, 03:17:31 PM »
Count me in.



"Cries and screams are music to my ears."
-Soundwave

Offline Philippa

  • The Queen of GTM
  • Giga Heavyweight
  • Posts: 6186
  • Rep: 0
  • ✊ Viva la Standard! ✊
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Battlebots 5
« Reply #4 on: November 25, 2011, 03:21:27 PM »
Will enter.

Offline Virus Bomb

Re: Battlebots 5
« Reply #5 on: November 25, 2011, 03:21:49 PM »
the moe motor isn't legal this time? (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

I'll still enter this though.

Offline Jonzu95

  • Giga Heavyweight
  • Posts: 12638
  • Rep: -28
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Battlebots 5
« Reply #6 on: November 25, 2011, 03:22:31 PM »
5 Battlebot seasons in few months? Oh come on... To be honest, you should take a break, freez..

Offline SKBT

Re: Battlebots 5
« Reply #7 on: November 25, 2011, 03:22:49 PM »
Remove the seeding. It offers an unfair advantage to the already "better builders"

Offline nicsan2009

  • Ultra Heavyweight
  • Posts: 1836
  • Rep: 5
  • Here we go again!
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • See profile for gamer tags: Yes
Re: Battlebots 5
« Reply #8 on: November 25, 2011, 03:24:43 PM »
Can we enter more than one bot again?
Hosted 2 Legit 2 Quit tourney Congrats Somebody
Hosted 2 Legit 2 Quit 2 congrats to Plazmic Inferno as well as Somebody (again)
Hosted RA2 World Cup Congrats to Senstro
Hosted TGRR congrats to 090901
ITAT Tournament- Champion
Beetle Bashers- Champion
Father and Son Tournament 2- Champion
GTM All Stars- HW Champion; MW runner up
Father and Son Tournament- Runner up
All Time Record 51-36

Offline smashysmashy

  • Posts: 2990
  • Rep: 0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Battlebots 5
« Reply #9 on: November 25, 2011, 03:25:41 PM »
Can we enter more than one bot again?
There's nothing to stop you.

Offline MassimoV

  • I Move Weight
  • *
  • Posts: 8929
  • Rep: 25
  • I make rap for people of Serbia
    • MassimoVTV
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Mourning Glory
    • Awards
  • See profile for gamer tags: Yes
  • Skype: myhandsarefood
Re: Battlebots 5
« Reply #10 on: November 25, 2011, 03:26:16 PM »
I'm entering.

Offline cephalopod

Re: Battlebots 5
« Reply #11 on: November 25, 2011, 03:30:25 PM »
Bleh, I was a seed, and suddenly I've been demoted T.T
But yeah, even if I was, this guaranteed bye thing is a little... weird :/
Like smashy said, some made un-IRL bots, and also it restricts how successful a potentially great 'unseeded' robot is, if it's knocked out by something equally awesome which then goes up against something that doesn't deserve to be where it is and would usually be knocked out in round 1.
But yeah, it's your tournament, that's just my take, and I'll probably still enter.
bristol bot builders / two headed death flamingo / snappy robots
//
kindest and friendliest '13, '15, '16, '17 / favourite staff member '14, '15

Offline Badnik96

  • tired of your shit
  • *
  • Posts: 17536
  • Rep: 3
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Battlebots 5
« Reply #12 on: November 25, 2011, 03:35:14 PM »
well I will be entering, but I probably won't get a seed XD

Offline smashysmashy

  • Posts: 2990
  • Rep: 0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Battlebots 5
« Reply #13 on: November 25, 2011, 03:36:29 PM »
Bleh, I was a seed, and suddenly I've been demoted T.T
But yeah, even if I was, this guaranteed bye thing is a little... weird :/
Like smashy said, some made un-IRL bots, and also it restricts how successful a potentially great 'unseeded' robot is, if it's knocked out by something equally awesome which then goes up against something that doesn't deserve to be where it is and would usually be knocked out in round 1.
But yeah, it's your tournament, that's just my take, and I'll probably still enter.
*cough*DSC*cough*

Offline NFX

  • *
  • Posts: 14035
  • Rep: 11
  • SliSliSliSliSliSliSliSli(0)
    • AwesomeFish921
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • See profile for gamer tags: Yes
  • Skype: nfxtreme0992
Re: Battlebots 5
« Reply #14 on: November 25, 2011, 04:00:33 PM »
I'd agree with the downsides of the seeding system. For one thing, 12 out of 20 seems too many, in my view. Plus, I would much rather see dragonsteincole's machines in the tournament than Urjak's barely realistic stuff, but Urjak's "seeding" as a result of winning more matches, means he would gain automatic entry. I don't think that's fair, personally.
Co-creator of The RA2 Randomiser



Offline freeziez

  • Ultra Heavyweight
  • Posts: 4720
  • Rep: 2
  • He's Mr. White Christmas, he's Mr. Snow...
    • youtube.com/freeziezGTM
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • See profile for gamer tags: Yes
Re: Battlebots 5
« Reply #15 on: November 25, 2011, 04:02:26 PM »
A couple of things:

- Seeding does not give automatic entry; if they don't enter, they're not in. The only people with a reserved spot are the winners from last season. And stop complaining about Urjak, just because one of his bots was unrealistic doesn't mean you get to moan about it. I'll modify the rules a little to help, but seriously guys.

- I moved the four unseeded members to seeds since they were the only ones that had won a match.

the moe motor isn't legal this time? (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

I'll still enter this though.

See #2 below.

I think Trov Glitch should be allowed in a realistic manner.
Also, why not allow cheatbot 2 parts below a certain efficiency. I love the Hworf Spike.
EDIT: And face spinners. Just because of the Garvin incident a perfectly IRL bot type has been outlawed.

1. No.
2. I'll go through the cheatbot components and see which ones I would consider IRL.
3. I know it's a stretch, but I'm not going to change that rule after 3 seasons of it not being there and working.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2013, 07:36:55 PM by Trovaner »
obligatory battlebots 5 comment

GTM Awards 2011

Best Tournament: B4ttlebots (freeziez)
Best New Tournament Host: freeziez
Most Suprising Tournament: B4ttlebots (freeziez)

Offline smashysmashy

  • Posts: 2990
  • Rep: 0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Battlebots 5
« Reply #16 on: November 25, 2011, 04:07:38 PM »
I'd agree with the downsides of the seeding system. For one thing, 12 out of 20 seems too many, in my view. Plus, I would much rather see dragonsteincole's machines in the tournament than Urjak's barely realistic stuff, but Urjak's "seeding" as a result of winning more matches, means he would gain automatic entry. I don't think that's fair, personally.
Why don't you start another common sense brigade?

Offline NFX

  • *
  • Posts: 14035
  • Rep: 11
  • SliSliSliSliSliSliSliSli(0)
    • AwesomeFish921
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • See profile for gamer tags: Yes
  • Skype: nfxtreme0992
Re: Battlebots 5
« Reply #17 on: November 25, 2011, 04:11:12 PM »
But if they do enter, then they bump another entry out of the bracket. I - at the risk of being decapitated - REALLY don't want Urjak stretching the IRL rules as far as he can, and pushing a much better "IRL" entry out of the brackets. I think a better way of making this work would be that a seed can claim their spot in only one of the four brackets. That would give the unseeded machines a chance to battle as well.
Co-creator of The RA2 Randomiser



Offline Ben Purse

  • Heavyweight
  • Posts: 777
  • Rep: -10
  • No Edgy Quotes Here...
    • http://www.youtube.com/us
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Battlebots 5
« Reply #18 on: November 25, 2011, 04:12:16 PM »
Will enter

Offline freeziez

  • Ultra Heavyweight
  • Posts: 4720
  • Rep: 2
  • He's Mr. White Christmas, he's Mr. Snow...
    • youtube.com/freeziezGTM
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • See profile for gamer tags: Yes
Re: Battlebots 5
« Reply #19 on: November 25, 2011, 04:13:46 PM »
But if they do enter, then they bump another entry out of the bracket. I - at the risk of being decapitated - REALLY don't want Urjak stretching the IRL rules as far as he can, and pushing a much better "IRL" entry out of the brackets. I think a better way of making this work would be that a seed can claim their spot in only one of the four brackets. That would give the unseeded machines a chance to battle as well.

And stop complaining about Urjak, just because one of his bots was unrealistic doesn't mean you get to bitch and moan about it. I'll modify the rules a little to help, but seriously guys.
obligatory battlebots 5 comment

GTM Awards 2011

Best Tournament: B4ttlebots (freeziez)
Best New Tournament Host: freeziez
Most Suprising Tournament: B4ttlebots (freeziez)