Author Topic: What would YOU build? (Read 19118 times)

modder TY · « **Reply #20 on:** May 20, 2008, 02:28:27 PM »

Lol, I forgot about the option to change the layout so once I did I noticed that... At first I thought it loged me in as Goose but when I posted at first (without the pic) I thought it was going to say my username was Goose.

R1885 · « **Reply #21 on:** June 19, 2008, 03:43:08 PM »

Mine bot so simple, its complex! All it is a E-TEK powered ramer armed with a spike. And when I say E-TEK, I mean SIX.

Naryar · « **Reply #22 on:** June 20, 2008, 02:21:49 AM »

Rammstein?

R1885 · « **Reply #23 on:** June 20, 2008, 10:44:26 AM »

What I ment was a box, six wheels, and a non-powerd spike.

Somebody · « **Reply #24 on:** June 21, 2008, 08:33:02 AM »

I would build an AW or Bw, with a Horizontal Spinner on the front, and some spikes on the back

Sage · « **Reply #25 on:** June 21, 2008, 08:54:46 AM »

i would build a DUAL HS with a chassis shaped like a Y. the vertical line would house batts and drive, and then the chassis would be lower for the 2 motors at the end of the diagonal lines of the Y. they would have a disc each, facing upward. i dont know what weapon yet, but they would be small (like hypnodisc) so they could pull the opponent in and chew.

kill343gs · « **Reply #26 on:** June 21, 2008, 03:59:57 PM »

Keep in mind that HSers do not work as well in real life as they do in RA2, though. Vertical spinners are usually a more popular choice.

Gigafrost · « **Reply #27 on:** June 21, 2008, 04:00:59 PM »

I would build a MW featuring four, motorized, spinning attatchments around the bot, for drills and drums. The bot can also spin, flailing the spinning weapons at the opponent. Never seen a bot like that but it would be interesting to watch.

Naryar · « **Reply #28 on:** June 21, 2008, 04:22:51 PM »

What Kill? VS are great in the antweight division, but when you see Nightmare getting raped... Vertical spinners have a weakness against HS. But this can be solved quite easily.

kill343gs · « **Reply #29 on:** June 21, 2008, 10:42:52 PM »

True, I was thinking more AW than higher weight classesw because that's all you hear about nowadays. Point taken.

Sorrow · « **Reply #30 on:** June 22, 2008, 10:48:57 AM »

Actually, the MW winner of this year's Robogames was a big Vert. spinner. Went undefeated.

Naryar · « **Reply #31 on:** June 22, 2008, 11:29:44 AM »

Well, I do believe VS are truly effective in the lower weight classes.

Antweights VS own ; LW and MW VS can be really good (Backlash and 259), but heavyweights are less successful and superheavyweight VS's do suck (these are rare, btw).

Scrap Daddy · « **Reply #32 on:** June 22, 2008, 11:35:05 AM »

259 was a HW.

Naryar · « **Reply #33 on:** June 22, 2008, 12:24:07 PM »

Ah. I meant 259 in RW.

Sorrow · « **Reply #34 on:** June 22, 2008, 01:20:40 PM »

...That was a Heavyweight.

R0B0SH4RK · « **Reply #35 on:** June 22, 2008, 02:05:13 PM »

I'd build a 6 wheel drive SHW lifter, quite similar to Sewer Snake, but with a bit more side armour, or a MW flipper, kind of like Ziggy.

System32 · « **Reply #36 on:** September 30, 2008, 12:55:57 PM »

Am I the first to suggest a bot like devil?

Urjak · « **Reply #37 on:** October 04, 2008, 10:38:03 PM »

Big and powerful Beetleweight wedge. :D

H@zm47 · « **Reply #38 on:** October 05, 2008, 03:52:15 AM »

A HS designed like my BBEANS 4 entry probably a lightweight

Naryar · « **Reply #39 on:** October 05, 2008, 04:04:06 AM »

Changing my mind... MW's are costly.

BW VS, with a darn good wedge like InfCon, a big disc and good motors, but few armor.