Author Topic: NAR DSL AI Pack (Read 27300 times)

Naryar · « **Reply #140 on:** May 17, 2009, 02:06:39 AM »

Well that could be a good idea, because ScooterPie is very good in stock RA1, but sucks in DSL.

But LW... in no way i can make that a poker/hammer hybrid like the original then.

Or i could dump the hammer - poker/hammer hybrids suck because both weapons don't work together.

Might do that as a MW.

Also my first release will not contain the RA1 Reincarnated team, but it will come later - sorry guys, lack of time.

JoeCB1991 · « **Reply #141 on:** May 17, 2009, 01:19:31 PM »

I hope it does come out next week, I just finished my last day of School so I'll have plenty of time to play it.

roboman2444 · « **Reply #142 on:** May 17, 2009, 02:03:26 PM »

aww man i still have a month left!

Somebody · « **Reply #143 on:** May 17, 2009, 02:27:13 PM »

1 month and 2 days for me.

Reier · « **Reply #144 on:** May 17, 2009, 02:29:07 PM »

I got done last week. =D

Naryar · « **Reply #145 on:** May 17, 2009, 02:39:53 PM »

It WILL come out next week, that i swear.

Got done last week too.

EDIT: Also all of the rammers are invertible now. ICM will be too as well as ALARM.

JoeCB1991 · « **Reply #146 on:** May 17, 2009, 03:56:37 PM »

Anyone else here a senior? [I do have to go back on Monday for a Graduation meeting, and on Thursday to rehearse the graduation ceremony, then to do the ceremony later that night]

RedSawn · « **Reply #147 on:** May 17, 2009, 04:26:25 PM »

I was technically done 2 weeks ago.
I say technically because I got the final exams coming up.

Oh well, hopefully this will be a good pack.

Naryar · « **Reply #148 on:** May 19, 2009, 10:18:49 AM »

Coming very soon.

Reier · « **Reply #149 on:** May 19, 2009, 10:28:05 AM »

System32 · « **Reply #150 on:** May 19, 2009, 04:18:15 PM »

hey, I'll send FMLAF 2, Amolax and Twist and turn 3 soon.

roboman2444 · « **Reply #151 on:** May 19, 2009, 04:42:10 PM »

Naryar · « **Reply #152 on:** May 20, 2009, 10:16:55 AM »

*worthless*

Reier · « **Reply #153 on:** May 20, 2009, 10:28:24 AM »

So we build these? Just one bot or a team?

Naryar · « **Reply #154 on:** May 20, 2009, 10:50:21 AM »

Quote from: Naryar;18083

HOW CAN YOU PARTICIPATE?

You can participate on three things:

If you submit a complete team, send me your entries in form of a RAR containing:
-your six bot files
-the team .bmp pic.
-a txt file, with team name, team motto and the bindings.

Please have a try at AI-ing your bots, but if you really can't i will AI them for you. Also i will mod the bindings of a bot if it doesn't works right.

If you submit a bot that will replace a replica, just send me the bot with the (optional) bindings. You can always submit several replica replacements of course.

If you submit a rebuild of an old DSL AI bot, just send me the bot. You can always submit several AI rebuilds of course.

You are obviously not limited to participating in just one of these. You can perfectly submit just one bot (and i will be thankful for that), or submit 4 personal teams and rebuild 1 complete team (that makes 30 bots... but i'm not asking you that!).

Here.

Naryar · « **Reply #155 on:** May 24, 2009, 07:11:45 AM »

Recall of what makes a bot legal :

REALISTIC RULE

-No bots that work on a glitch (Trinity, nasty pickles even if no one uses them) or too glitchy (i will restrict moving flail weapons).
No spin motors on burst motors or servos (burst enhancing).
Chaining allowed on the limit of 2 chained motors.

-I will not allow battery stacking or servo/snapper overlapping, but i will allow a small margin: if the components just barely - BARELY - enter in each other without affecting the bot IRL it's okay (e.g. a multi-extender slightly intersecting a motor or a battery.

No weapon overlapping either, but two weapons can slightly intersect if and only if they are static. If it could be implemented in real life it's fine.

-All wedges are fine excepted if they violate the next rule.

-Moving parts cannot intersect other moving parts, and can only intersect partly static parts if that could be implemented IRL (a saw passing through a skirt hinge like in my Battle Scar is fine because it's in the chassis and the skirt hinge could be cut into two and fixed at the side without the attachment), but a saw passing completely through a sheet is NOT fine), that makes the wedge of Urjak's The Devil's Cherry technically illegal as well as Somebody's HW hammer heads.

-Attachment or armor static parts (plastic/metalsheets, baseplate anchors, snowplows, extenders ramplates, shell spinner parts, etc) can intersect each other freely because they could be bound or welded (or cutted for a hole) IRL , but cannot stack. Weapons can also pass through these (as in Top Dog, Bad Dog and SnowJob)

Remember, if it could be done IRL, it's fine.

-Also you CAN edit the bot file for lowering the height under the game's limits (like in the Arthrobotics team) and making cool chassis (see Goose's donut bot). However, components that are supposed to stay in the chassis must stay in the chassis (like batteries, control boards, Magmotors, baseplate anchors, etc) - like the batteries that can get partly out of the chassis : nothing of that.

I think it's all.

Naryar · « **Reply #156 on:** July 02, 2009, 01:43:27 AM »

I will try to come up with all the replica replacements done before i leave, but i will most likely need help.

What i need:
-All of the RA Reincarnated bots excepted Gammaraze and Aquarius
-AW and BW rammers for SteelYard Dogs Bot3 and Bot4 (Plus SYD skin if you can)
-LW hammer with a katana for Team Dragon Bot3 (Plus Team Dragon Skin as well)
-BW hammer for North Polers Bot3 (Plus North Polers skin as well)
-MW SnS with 60kg hammers for Team HEX Bot4 (S32 builds it)
-BW poker for Red Zone Bot3 (can't come up with something decent)

HIGH QUALITY BOTS as well.

And finally some UI, yes.

Just the background.bmp with the words "NAR AI" on it, but something stylish, fitting with the normal UI.

Thanks.

JoeBlo · « **Reply #157 on:** July 02, 2009, 04:40:59 AM »

I will start working on the UI now....

is it ok if I use parts of your signature for it ? i have an idea in mind

Naryar · « **Reply #158 on:** July 02, 2009, 04:45:42 AM »

Hmm, i would think of something more DSL-UI-ish but do as you wish.

JoeBlo · « **Reply #159 on:** July 02, 2009, 04:59:41 AM »

I will whip up a few possibilities and send them your way and you can choose