Poll

While I'm not doing an LvD Sequal next, it will come in the future.  One question has been hanging on my mind though... Should I have denied Mecha Adolf Hitler!?

Adolf ist mein Führer
17 (60.7%)
You don F*cked up.
11 (39.3%)

Total Members Voted: 28

Author Topic: Light vs Dark - SBVA  (Read 39140 times)

Offline Avalanche

  • Retired.
  • Ultra Heavyweight
  • Posts: 3107
  • Rep: -34
  • Yeah, I don't know why I'm still here either.
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Discord: ThePootisPower#8377
Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« Reply #100 on: February 25, 2017, 07:55:21 PM »
Right: I dispute the Solaris VS MITP decision. I'd like somebody who was notguldenflame to rejudge the fight, preferably a tournament mod.

Why? Because I honestly don't feel like it's a good idea to have the tournament host act as judge when his robot is in the tournament, and especially when he's picked a side to be on. And this has happened before: Yugitom made judges decisions for Pangolin's fights during Death Battle because DemonOfTomorrow was the builder of Pangolin and the host of Death Battle simultaneously.

Here's the criteria, again: "Judging will be done by Aggression:(Amount of hits) Control: (The one that flew/was shoved the least) and Damage: (The in-game scoring)"

Ok, Damage: we can't see the indicators or the post match stuff. Presumably Solaris won, due to tearing off the wheel and weapon.

Control: Obviously MITP, sent Solaris across the ground and up in the air with hits, and without a weapon it shoved it around the arena.

Aggression: "Aggression was the hardest to decide.  The ratio I had at the end for aggression points were 68 to 59." What ratio? It's literally how many hits did each bot do? just ****ing count em. I dispute the decision over this: I don't think this is being counted right. You cna see moments when MITP's blade suddenly spins down then back up: that's it hitting something, but i don't think it's being included. The ratio just does not feel conducive to the hits, which is half of why i'm disputing the decision.

Also, 09, I'll have a proper response to your argument when I wake up, it's 1 o clock over here and I haven't the time right now as my original post got deleted due to internet issues.

Badger: That robot had flaws and had already been defeated by the point of the argument, plus just because one bot isn't exactly fair doesn't suddenly make your bot any better. I'll explain my issues when i wake up later today.
Former DSL HW champion.
Runner-Up in The Cybernetic Colosseum HW division.
Semi-finalist in RNP: Sword of Glory.
Robogames 1 BW Runner-up.
Professional cunt.
Man of a thousand alt accounts.

Offline Gulden

  • Am I still considered active?
  • Posts: 1337
  • Rep: 7
  • Currently trying to make a Riff in Time and Space.
    • https://www.youtube.com/c
  • Awards Donated money for site hosting 2019 BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Discord: _gulden
Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« Reply #101 on: February 25, 2017, 08:02:54 PM »
Aggression: What ratio? It's literally how many hits did each bot do? just ****ing count em.
Ratio is amount of hits.  68 hits for solaris is pretty much definite, however, I didn't really know how to count the wedging of MitP.

I'm personally ok with a re-judging.  This was really close.

Besides, if I'll rig anything, I usually do it so I'll lose.  Back in WCR, I rigged it so BattleBreaker didn't win against Blizzard in the rumble, so rng didn't decide the winner.
Unofficial ruler of the RR2 thread.

Offline Baconus_Yum

  • The Master of Bacon
  • Heavyweight
  • Posts: 618
  • Rep: -1
  • I like Bacon
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« Reply #102 on: February 25, 2017, 08:05:32 PM »
Aggression: What ratio? It's literally how many hits did each bot do? just ****ing count em.
Ratio is amount of hits.  68 hits for solaris is pretty much definite, however, I didn't really know how to count the wedging of MitP.

I'm personally ok with a re-judging.  This was really close.
I'd say take 5 people who are not in the tourney and make them judge.
Didn't Win Anything Award GTM 2K17
Notable Tournament Entrees:
Bacon Emergency: 2nd Place in Emergency exit.
Spinner From the North: 2nd Place in SFTW Showdown
Abominable: 1st place in the MW division of The Cybernetic Colosseum

Offline 090901

  • alcoholic in denial
  • *
  • Posts: 7006
  • Rep: 22
  • :mrgreen:
  • Awards Donated money for site hosting 2019 GTMCS2 Divison Winner GTMCS Division Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« Reply #103 on: February 25, 2017, 08:06:16 PM »
Right: I dispute the Solaris VS MITP decision. I'd like somebody who was notguldenflame to rejudge the fight, preferably a tournament mod.

Why? Because I honestly don't feel like it's a good idea to have the tournament host act as judge when his robot is in the tournament, and especially when he's picked a side to be on. And this has happened before: Yugitom made judges decisions for Pangolin's fights during Death Battle because DemonOfTomorrow was the builder of Pangolin and the host of Death Battle simultaneously.

You didn't seem to have a problem when he literally judged his own one sided fight against Jungle Fever and nobody else on your team has a problem with the result, seems like someone is a bit bootyblasted that they are now losing after all the sh** talking he was doing earlier and have his strategy E X P O S E D and picking the obvious bot for the round.

Badger: That robot had flaws and had already been defeated by the point of the argument, plus just because one bot isn't exactly fair doesn't suddenly make your bot any better. I'll explain my issues when i wake up later today.
Yeah, it's not like Paladin wasn't beaten at all in the literal first video uploaded for this tourney or anything. It's also not like Flipster has 3 Long VDMA bursts while Paladin only has 3 Medium sized ones and nobody's complaining about Flipster

Offline rafaxexe

  • Antweight
  • Posts: 4
  • Rep: 0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« Reply #104 on: February 25, 2017, 08:16:12 PM »
I don't really get how does all of this work, but I'd say Light team has more potential

Offline 090901

  • alcoholic in denial
  • *
  • Posts: 7006
  • Rep: 22
  • :mrgreen:
  • Awards Donated money for site hosting 2019 GTMCS2 Divison Winner GTMCS Division Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« Reply #105 on: February 25, 2017, 08:16:51 PM »
I don't really get how does all of this work, but I'd say Light team has more potential
Thanks for the support man  :beer:

Offline Shield

  • The question isn't who will let me.
  • Ultra Heavyweight
  • Posts: 2196
  • Rep: 8
  • It's who will stop me.
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« Reply #106 on: February 25, 2017, 08:18:48 PM »
I don't really get how does all of this work, but I'd say Light team has more potential
Thanks for the support man  :beer:

third reich will rise again
beep beep

Offline Baconus_Yum

  • The Master of Bacon
  • Heavyweight
  • Posts: 618
  • Rep: -1
  • I like Bacon
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« Reply #107 on: February 25, 2017, 08:20:15 PM »
Honestly, this entire tournament has been based upon luck. You have no idea what is coming next. I like this tourney idea, but I think it could be even better if both teams sent their lists, then they see the other teams list, and then edit one robot from their original list and then the fights happen. I am not trying to be biased in any way by saying this. Also not trying to start any flame wars.

-Baconus
Didn't Win Anything Award GTM 2K17
Notable Tournament Entrees:
Bacon Emergency: 2nd Place in Emergency exit.
Spinner From the North: 2nd Place in SFTW Showdown
Abominable: 1st place in the MW division of The Cybernetic Colosseum

Offline Avalanche

  • Retired.
  • Ultra Heavyweight
  • Posts: 3107
  • Rep: -34
  • Yeah, I don't know why I'm still here either.
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Discord: ThePootisPower#8377
Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« Reply #108 on: February 25, 2017, 08:21:02 PM »
Right: I dispute the Solaris VS MITP decision. I'd like somebody who was notguldenflame to rejudge the fight, preferably a tournament mod.

Why? Because I honestly don't feel like it's a good idea to have the tournament host act as judge when his robot is in the tournament, and especially when he's picked a side to be on. And this has happened before: Yugitom made judges decisions for Pangolin's fights during Death Battle because DemonOfTomorrow was the builder of Pangolin and the host of Death Battle simultaneously.
(Image removed from quote.)
You didn't seem to have a problem when he literally judged his own one sided fight against Jungle Fever and nobody else on your team has a problem with the result, seems like someone is a bit bootyblasted that they are now losing after all the sh** talking he was doing earlier and have his strategy E X P O S E D. (Image removed from quote.)
Firstly, my sh**talking has been labelled as intentional and playing up to the fact I'm in Team Dark. You on the other hand are just trying to get a ride out of me and get me banned. Yeah, no.. And no, I didn't, because there was no point in disputing it, and I expected most fights to be straight knock outs or ootas if paladin was involved, and I've mostly been right in that assumption. Also, he's already accepted I've made a valid point, so perhaps it might be a good idea to quiet down, especially after I ceased sh**talking once the situation got worse, which just leaves you as the arrogant one especially considering I planned ahead and informed everyone that I was playing up the natural villain role because of being a Team Dark member, and ensured that people realised I wasn't being personal about it. You talk about game being "bootyblasted" but you try to mock me with anime images and seem to take a personal issue with the not-actually-hating-the-enemy sh**-talking. Let's put it this way: people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Il leave it at that, as I need some sleep for once.

Aggression: What ratio? It's literally how many hits did each bot do? just ****ing count em.
Ratio is amount of hits.  68 hits for solaris is pretty much definite, however, I didn't really know how to count the wedging of MitP.

I'm personally ok with a re-judging.  This was really close.

Besides, if I'll rig anything, I usually do it so I'll lose.  Back in WCR, I rigged it so BattleBreaker didn't win against Blizzard in the rumble, so rng didn't decide the winner.
Thanks for not throwing a sh**fit at my dispute.
Former DSL HW champion.
Runner-Up in The Cybernetic Colosseum HW division.
Semi-finalist in RNP: Sword of Glory.
Robogames 1 BW Runner-up.
Professional cunt.
Man of a thousand alt accounts.

Offline 090901

  • alcoholic in denial
  • *
  • Posts: 7006
  • Rep: 22
  • :mrgreen:
  • Awards Donated money for site hosting 2019 GTMCS2 Divison Winner GTMCS Division Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« Reply #109 on: February 25, 2017, 08:21:28 PM »
Honestly, this entire tournament has been based upon luck. You have no idea what is coming next. I like this tourney idea, but I think it could be even better if both teams sent their lists, then they see the other teams list, and then edit one robot from their original list and then the fights happen. I am not trying to be biased in any way by saying this. Also not trying to start any flame wars.

-Baconus
This would actually be pretty dope for the first couple of rounds, but I would say list shouldn't be in order when the opponents sees them though, just to make things more interesting.

Firstly, my sh**talking has been labelled as intentional and playing up to the fact I'm in Team Dark. You on the other hand are just trying to get a ride out of me and get me banned. Yeah, no.. And no, I didn't, because there was no point in disputing it, and I expected most fights to be straight knock outs or ootas if paladin was involved, and I've mostly been right in that assumption. Also, he's already accepted I've made a valid point, so perhaps it might be a good idea to quiet down, especially after I ceased sh**talking once the situation got worse, which just leaves you as the arrogant one especially considering I planned ahead and informed everyone that I was playing up the natural villain role because of being a Team Dark member, and ensured that people realised I wasn't being personal about it. You talk about game being "bootyblasted" but you try to mock me with anime images and seem to take a personal issue with the not-actually-hating-the-enemy sh**-talking. Let's put it this way: people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Il leave it at that, as I need some sleep for once.
So basically you are the only one who's allowed to sh** talk or banter when winning?  :dumb)
Also, it's pretty damn arrogant to go and call for a redo without asking the captain of your team or anything, all it does it make you look like a poor loser fam.

also here's that anime image too:

Offline rafaxexe

  • Antweight
  • Posts: 4
  • Rep: 0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« Reply #110 on: February 25, 2017, 08:26:25 PM »
I don't really get how does all of this work, but I'd say Light team has more potential
Thanks for the support man  :beer:

third reich will rise again
Dind't know ppl would like /pol/ here hahaha, great
Would love to help mein führer, is there a way for me to participate in these tournaments? what version are you even playing(or do i need/should have any mod)?

Offline Badger

  • Permanent Artifact
  • Giga Heavyweight
  • Posts: 6298
  • Rep: 2
  • I wish to be with my people
  • Awards BOTM Winner Donated money for site hosting 2019
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« Reply #111 on: February 25, 2017, 08:30:55 PM »
Holy sh** the dark team tears are delicious. Why are you all (by which I mean some of you) so damn salty?
Right: I dispute the Solaris VS MITP decision. I'd like somebody who was notguldenflame to rejudge the fight, preferably a tournament mod.

Why? Because I honestly don't feel like it's a good idea to have the tournament host act as judge when his robot is in the tournament, and especially when he's picked a side to be on. And this has happened before: Yugitom made judges decisions for Pangolin's fights during Death Battle because DemonOfTomorrow was the builder of Pangolin and the host of Death Battle simultaneously.
(Image removed from quote.)
You didn't seem to have a problem when he literally judged his own one sided fight against Jungle Fever and nobody else on your team has a problem with the result, seems like someone is a bit bootyblasted that they are now losing after all the sh** talking he was doing earlier and have his strategy E X P O S E D. (Image removed from quote.)
Firstly, my sh**talking has been labelled as intentional and playing up to the fact I'm in Team Dark. You on the other hand are just trying to get a ride out of me and get me banned. Yeah, no.. And no, I didn't, because there was no point in disputing it, and I expected most fights to be straight knock outs or ootas if paladin was involved, and I've mostly been right in that assumption. Also, he's already accepted I've made a valid point, so perhaps it might be a good idea to quiet down, especially after I ceased sh**talking once the situation got worse, which just leaves you as the arrogant one especially considering I planned ahead and informed everyone that I was playing up the natural villain role because of being a Team Dark member, and ensured that people realised I wasn't being personal about it. You talk about game being "bootyblasted" but you try to mock me with anime images and seem to take a personal issue with the not-actually-hating-the-enemy sh**-talking. Let's put it this way: people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Il leave it at that, as I need some sleep for once.

Aggression: What ratio? It's literally how many hits did each bot do? just ****ing count em.
Ratio is amount of hits.  68 hits for solaris is pretty much definite, however, I didn't really know how to count the wedging of MitP.

I'm personally ok with a re-judging.  This was really close.

Besides, if I'll rig anything, I usually do it so I'll lose.  Back in WCR, I rigged it so BattleBreaker didn't win against Blizzard in the rumble, so rng didn't decide the winner.
Thanks for not throwing a sh**fit at my dispute.
Didn't read your essay explanations, but if you seriously think that the robot that sustained no damage lost to the bot which lost its weapon and a wheel, you're deluded.
also lol at most toxic guy around calling others out on this sh**
Google Drive with my newer bots

Offline Gulden

  • Am I still considered active?
  • Posts: 1337
  • Rep: 7
  • Currently trying to make a Riff in Time and Space.
    • https://www.youtube.com/c
  • Awards Donated money for site hosting 2019 BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Discord: _gulden
Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« Reply #112 on: February 25, 2017, 08:37:58 PM »


I asked demon about this, he's ok with the decision.
Captains>Co-Captains.
The Re-Judging is a no-go.
Unofficial ruler of the RR2 thread.

Offline 09090901

  • competitive irl
  • *
  • Posts: 1591
  • Rep: 22
  • anti-boomer super soldier
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« Reply #113 on: February 25, 2017, 08:49:18 PM »
k yall may wanna quell the sh**talking now

srs tho let's try to keep flames down. Throwing a lil shade at each other is in the nature of the tournament and is fine, but let's try not to bait each other just to get a rise out of certain users.
DSL-IRL is the libtard’s meta. Go drink more soylent, retard! #BLUELIVESMATTER

Offline Avalanche

  • Retired.
  • Ultra Heavyweight
  • Posts: 3107
  • Rep: -34
  • Yeah, I don't know why I'm still here either.
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Discord: ThePootisPower#8377
Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« Reply #114 on: February 25, 2017, 08:52:01 PM »
Right: first, Demon: FFS. Second, Gulden: can you hand judging duties over to someone else who is neutral please?
Former DSL HW champion.
Runner-Up in The Cybernetic Colosseum HW division.
Semi-finalist in RNP: Sword of Glory.
Robogames 1 BW Runner-up.
Professional cunt.
Man of a thousand alt accounts.

Offline 090901

  • alcoholic in denial
  • *
  • Posts: 7006
  • Rep: 22
  • :mrgreen:
  • Awards Donated money for site hosting 2019 GTMCS2 Divison Winner GTMCS Division Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« Reply #115 on: February 25, 2017, 08:52:39 PM »
Gulden: can you hand judging duties over to someone else who is neutral please?
Agreed for sure.

Offline Gulden

  • Am I still considered active?
  • Posts: 1337
  • Rep: 7
  • Currently trying to make a Riff in Time and Space.
    • https://www.youtube.com/c
  • Awards Donated money for site hosting 2019 BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Discord: _gulden
Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« Reply #116 on: February 25, 2017, 08:58:33 PM »
Gulden: can you hand judging duties over to someone else who is neutral please?
Agreed for sure.

Well team Light captain calls for it.  I'll hand the baton off to thracker.  Cus I saw him first. :P
Unofficial ruler of the RR2 thread.

Offline Gulden

  • Am I still considered active?
  • Posts: 1337
  • Rep: 7
  • Currently trying to make a Riff in Time and Space.
    • https://www.youtube.com/c
  • Awards Donated money for site hosting 2019 BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Discord: _gulden
Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« Reply #117 on: February 25, 2017, 09:11:27 PM »


Finally done with this.

Which means...
Unofficial ruler of the RR2 thread.

Offline 090901

  • alcoholic in denial
  • *
  • Posts: 7006
  • Rep: 22
  • :mrgreen:
  • Awards Donated money for site hosting 2019 GTMCS2 Divison Winner GTMCS Division Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« Reply #118 on: February 25, 2017, 09:14:05 PM »

(Image removed from quote.)

Finally done with this.
I thought we were talking about for future matches, but I'll take it I guess  :dumb)


Offline doot

Re: Light vs Dark - SBVA
« Reply #119 on: February 25, 2017, 09:19:28 PM »
I TRIED SO HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARD