Author Topic: Signature size (Read 9311 times)

russian roulette · « **Reply #60 on:** May 09, 2010, 10:08:34 PM »

Quote from: 090901 on May 09, 2010, 09:54:46 PM

I was using google chrome at their house.

That explains it, Google chrome likes doing things its way. From slowing/speeding up animated gifs to making small text large.

Reier · « **Reply #61 on:** May 09, 2010, 10:58:56 PM »

Actually Chrome is way better for viewing .gifs IMO. Firefox is lame. >;D

090901 · « **Reply #62 on:** May 09, 2010, 11:04:19 PM »

Quote from: Reier on May 09, 2010, 10:58:56 PM

Actually Chrome is way better for viewing .gifs IMO. Firefox is lame. >;D

Yeah, Chrome pwns.

Jonzu95 · « **Reply #63 on:** May 09, 2010, 11:11:20 PM »

Mozilla is best! Chrome sucks!

Sage · « **Reply #64 on:** May 09, 2010, 11:11:48 PM »

Mozilla FTW

G.K. · « **Reply #65 on:** May 10, 2010, 12:18:26 AM »

*Warning - Firefox user speaking*

JoeBlo · « **Reply #66 on:** May 10, 2010, 12:42:07 AM »

Quote from: ACAMS on May 09, 2010, 11:53:33 AM

The 200 tall is the MAIN worry!

that was my main problem with peoples.. Craaigs wasnt one of the offenders I had in mind when making that post

guys with the shoping list of tourament results... slap it on your wiki page not in your sig, if people want to see them they will look them up, not be forced to read them 173 times a day

Reier · « **Reply #67 on:** May 10, 2010, 08:36:00 AM »

In all honesty, IE has the mest method of watching .wmv videos and saving files.

JoeBlo · « **Reply #68 on:** May 10, 2010, 08:40:31 AM »

but fails horribly in every other category

Reier · « **Reply #69 on:** May 10, 2010, 08:42:06 AM »

Eh...dunno. It's par with FF (maybe better) and just a tad slower than Chrome so I say no.

JoeBlo · « **Reply #70 on:** May 10, 2010, 08:50:20 AM »

forgetting to mention how vulnerable it is

and its lack of open sourceness :P

Naryar · « **Reply #71 on:** May 10, 2010, 09:06:06 AM »

Firefox pwns all !

MR TEST · « **Reply #72 on:** May 26, 2010, 11:15:56 AM »

TEST 1
TEST 2

TESTING

ACAMS · « **Reply #73 on:** May 26, 2010, 11:32:48 AM »

Thank you Mr TEST!

Mr TEST has asked me to tell you that your sigs can now be longer than 14 lines, but images will remain at 200px......UNFORTUNATLLY, only 200px of your sig will show without using the scroll bar!

It will be 28 lines as soon as we are finished.

cephalopod · « **Reply #74 on:** May 26, 2010, 11:34:17 AM »

Aah, sweet :D

ACAMS · « **Reply #75 on:** July 04, 2010, 04:48:13 PM »

I have ~~good~~ news.....those of you abusing the 200px sig limit now have funny looking sigs.

Viper89 · « **Reply #76 on:** July 06, 2010, 06:10:58 AM »

Quote from: ACAMS on May 26, 2010, 11:32:48 AM

Thank you Mr TEST!

Mr TEST has asked me to tell you that your sigs can now be longer than 14 lines, but images will remain at 200px......UNFORTUNATLLY, only 200px of your sig will show without using the scroll bar!

It will be 28 lines as soon as we are finished.

Who is Mr. Test?

Naryar · « **Reply #77 on:** July 06, 2010, 06:48:17 AM »

He's the final boss of Gametechmods

JoeBlo · « **Reply #78 on:** July 06, 2010, 08:03:33 AM »

^^ Winner ^^

Somebody · « **Reply #79 on:** July 06, 2010, 08:14:15 AM »

ACAMS's test user to see if things work for non-admins.
Wait... ACAMS is double-accounting...