Author Topic: Reputation value (Read 13938 times)

ACAMS · « **on:** October 22, 2008, 09:45:43 AM »

I have been asked several times about this reputation thing that goose enabled, and you all thought it should be on building ability.

right now it is like this....

-20- can only hope to improve

-10- has a little shameless behaviour in the past

0---is an unknown quantity at this point

10--is on a distinguished road

20--will become famous soon enough

30-- has a spectacular aura about

40--is a jewel in the rough

and on and on.....

What I need are suggestions to replace those with 15 total. starting with -30

-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110

3 negative
0 for new members that does not sound bad
10 -110 for members that have been here

By now everybody should be able to give rep, so don't get carried away with it.

Since I have been asked several times I expect to see several lists of suggestions.

Gigafrost · « **Reply #1 on:** October 22, 2008, 10:50:33 AM »

-10 - You are highly flammable
-20 - You tend to be easy prey for n00b whackers
-30 - You are an official Forum Hategod

I'll do the others later...

Flying_Chao · « **Reply #2 on:** October 22, 2008, 02:49:39 PM »

They should be third person. (No "You")

Naryar · « **Reply #3 on:** October 22, 2008, 03:06:53 PM »

-30: should be banned.
-20: is highly flammable.
-10: could act better. (S32, Man Manu)
0: is undecided.
10: has accomplished a few good deeds.(JoeCB, Hazmat,Reier, etc...)
20: walks on the right path.(Urjak, Somebody)
30: is appreciated among the community.
40: will become famous soon enough.(Naryar)
50: worked enough to be a respected builder.(Kill343gs, SSG)
60: simply shines.(Scrap Daddy, R0B0, Barbie)
70: is considered as a veteran.(Inf, Sage)
80: has already several statues dedicated to him/her.(Pyscolone, Goose)
90: proudly bears the title of RA2 master. (Click, Darkrat, Lu-tze)
100: has the statute of walking legend. (Starcore, ACAMS)
110: ... also known as God.

man manu · « **Reply #4 on:** October 22, 2008, 03:48:35 PM »

LOL at the last one

Naryar · « **Reply #5 on:** October 22, 2008, 04:07:32 PM »

Have a look at my opinions too...

Sage · « **Reply #6 on:** October 22, 2008, 04:39:27 PM »

i think there should be a X ranking, for legends past. like starcore, lu-tze, darkrat.
and Kill is NOT better then barbie, ROBO, or even scrap. scrap better then SSG.
Goose and ACAMS would be the gods, pyscolone and click should switch.

thats basically my opinion.

kill343gs · « **Reply #7 on:** October 22, 2008, 05:09:20 PM »

Why should reputation be based off of bot building skill? That will just start flame wars. I thought this was about post quality.

Sage · « **Reply #8 on:** October 22, 2008, 05:20:26 PM »

perhaps there should be 2 different ones?

Naryar · « **Reply #9 on:** October 22, 2008, 05:26:52 PM »

Quote from: Sage;18333

perhaps there should be 2 different ones?

Good idea.

ACAMS · « **Reply #10 on:** October 22, 2008, 05:51:58 PM »

Quote from: kill343gs;18328

Why should reputation be based off of bot building skill? That will just start flame wars. I thought this was about post quality.

IT IS!!!!

I see it is already causing trouble so I will make minor changes and leave it basically like it is.

infiniteinertia · « **Reply #11 on:** October 22, 2008, 07:05:55 PM »

we should definitely have builder skill rating too.

Gigafrost · « **Reply #12 on:** October 24, 2008, 10:05:23 AM »

And maybe add the political stance from the wiki as well? That would be cool.

man manu · « **Reply #13 on:** October 24, 2008, 01:57:52 PM »

i think as this is showing newbies who is a reliable person to take advice from mad should have some good rep

System32 · « **Reply #14 on:** October 24, 2008, 02:12:13 PM »

Putting me next to the Main Menu is just enough to provoke a Puppy-suicide-bomb-flogging match, let alone a flame war.

Naryar · « **Reply #15 on:** October 24, 2008, 02:29:30 PM »

Putting you next to anybody is just enough to provoke a flame war.

System32 · « **Reply #16 on:** October 24, 2008, 02:31:02 PM »

Oh, it burns...

kill343gs · « **Reply #17 on:** October 24, 2008, 05:04:10 PM »

I totally did not predict that at all ^

Gigafrost · « **Reply #18 on:** October 29, 2008, 01:42:08 PM »

-Analyzes System32 Through the Wiki-

"The master of flames -sizzle-" careful manmanu... He's highly flammable.

Naryar · « **Reply #19 on:** October 29, 2008, 02:50:15 PM »

Each time i see S32's wiki, it is better.