gametechmods
Site Information => Site News and Feedback => Topic started by: ACAMS on October 22, 2008, 09:45:43 AM
-
I have been asked several times about this reputation thing that goose enabled, and you all thought it should be on building ability.
right now it is like this....
-20- can only hope to improve
-10- has a little shameless behaviour in the past
0---is an unknown quantity at this point
10--is on a distinguished road
20--will become famous soon enough
30-- has a spectacular aura about
40--is a jewel in the rough
and on and on.....
What I need are suggestions to replace those with 15 total. starting with -30
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
3 negative
0 for new members that does not sound bad
10 -110 for members that have been here
By now everybody should be able to give rep, so don't get carried away with it.
Since I have been asked several times I expect to see several lists of suggestions.
-
-10 - You are highly flammable
-20 - You tend to be easy prey for n00b whackers
-30 - You are an official Forum Hategod
I'll do the others later...
-
They should be third person. (No "You")
-
-30: should be banned.
-20: is highly flammable.
-10: could act better. (S32, Man Manu)
0: is undecided.
10: has accomplished a few good deeds.(JoeCB, Hazmat,Reier, etc...)
20: walks on the right path.(Urjak, Somebody)
30: is appreciated among the community.
40: will become famous soon enough.(Naryar)
50: worked enough to be a respected builder.(Kill343gs, SSG)
60: simply shines.(Scrap Daddy, R0B0, Barbie)
70: is considered as a veteran.(Inf, Sage)
80: has already several statues dedicated to him/her.(Pyscolone, Goose)
90: proudly bears the title of RA2 master. (Click, Darkrat, Lu-tze)
100: has the statute of walking legend. (Starcore, ACAMS)
110: ... also known as God.
-
LOL at the last one
-
Have a look at my opinions too...
-
i think there should be a X ranking, for legends past. like starcore, lu-tze, darkrat.
and Kill is NOT better then barbie, ROBO, or even scrap. scrap better then SSG.
Goose and ACAMS would be the gods, pyscolone and click should switch.
thats basically my opinion.
-
Why should reputation be based off of bot building skill? That will just start flame wars. I thought this was about post quality.
-
perhaps there should be 2 different ones?
-
perhaps there should be 2 different ones?
Good idea.
-
Why should reputation be based off of bot building skill? That will just start flame wars. I thought this was about post quality.
IT IS!!!!
I see it is already causing trouble so I will make minor changes and leave it basically like it is.
-
we should definitely have builder skill rating too.
-
And maybe add the political stance from the wiki as well? That would be cool.
-
i think as this is showing newbies who is a reliable person to take advice from mad should have some good rep
-
Putting me next to the Main Menu is just enough to provoke a Puppy-suicide-bomb-flogging match, let alone a flame war.
-
Putting you next to anybody is just enough to provoke a flame war.
-
Oh, it burns...
-
I totally did not predict that at all ^
-
-Analyzes System32 Through the Wiki (https://gametechmods.com/RA2wiki/index.php?title=System32)-
"The master of flames -sizzle-" careful manmanu... He's highly flammable.
-
Each time i see S32's wiki, it is better.
-
ahh i dont understand. Is this a thing where i have to read the wiki to understand? because i havent
-
Man manu doesn't understand ....... how unusual .........
Do I get my -30 anytime soon.....?
-
Reputation is not something that should be represented by numbers under somebody's avatar. This will only create flamewars.
-
Strange that you said that. That's exactly what Venko said about the grudge/ally list.
-
Venko smells funny.
-
SMELLS?
I'll say "sounds", but...
-
I think everyone should be able to give Rep. Perhaps if the have over 10 posts.
Now, I know I'm risking giving people like Me and Venko -1000 Rep from a certain few members, but at least it will give a more fair opinion than a few members downgrading without remorse.
-
Some people are a lot more biased than others, and therefore too much power in the wrong hands isn't a good thing. It would be different if there were never any flame wars or arguments around here, but that is certainly not the case. Power like that must be earned, not granted by default when you reach a certain post count. You can compare somebody who posts like serge or myself with less than 300 posts over a long period of time to someone like Cude who amassed a large amount of posts over a short period of time, who would you rather have controlling your reputation value?
-
Both.
Cuda is already a More respected member, Albeit a little odd, and most members who intend to stay make more than 10 posts anyway.
-
Did you post the exact same post in two different places?
-
Both.
Cuda is already a More respected member, Albeit a little odd, and most members who intend to stay make more than 10 posts anyway.
Ok, how about somebody like Hydro then? He has more than 10 posts, I'm sure of it.
Re FC: I already fixed it, but thanks for your concern.
-
He's actually willing to do good. He's like those guys trying to help, but ends up making wars.
-
I don't think you see my point. Let me try and put it this way. Think of it like your dentist. You want to make sure that guy jamming his fingers halfway down your throat knows what he's doing, right? I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want some random person giving me a root canal. It's the same idea.
-
I think that every time someone starts a flame war, they are docked 5 rep points.
-
*imagines two kids pointing at each other and saying "But he started it!"*
-
*Imagines my reputation actually being somewhere between the Marina Trench and one Inch to the side of the Center of the Earth*
-
If the system gets implemented at all, I want a negative number to be displayed for me, since I feel that if I actually should be respected for what I've done, I'll be respected without the need for a rating.
-
^qft^
-
I will probably disable it again as I KNEW it would cause trouble......I guess goose was bored when he enabled it.
-
No, I mean that every time someone posts that elongates a flame war, they lose 2 or 3 rep points. That will make people just walk away from them when Venko comes back.
-
Depends of what you call a post that elongates a flame war...
If it's constructive/clever/true, no need to lose points.
-
Yes, but if it is another of Venko's novels, that loses points.
-
Agreed.
-
it's gone? *gasp* that's not fair. i had the second worst reputation. I want it back!
-
Just put me down under "god".
-
Ummmm...... reputation values are no longer being considered on GTM......
-
That's right.....every body here has a bad reputation, so we don't want to advertize it!
-
Apart from me of course.
-
Apart from me of course.
lol NOT!
-
I think he was talking about how everybody advertises his bad reputation....
-
ohhhhh....
(random) abudabi eat my tenis patch in the computer kid.
-
Don't go starting wars in Abudabi over virtual tennis.
Also keep on topic...
-
Thanks for putting in the thought though. Its always appreciated!