This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Naryar
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ... 1267
781
« on: May 04, 2016, 12:40:41 PM »
After the habitual procrastination, I have built something and am going to send it asap.
Although I notice my rival hasn't send anything. It will be very dishonorabru if he bails out >:O
782
« on: May 04, 2016, 12:37:10 PM »
 Blade Assault. Has 5mm aluminium, if I remember correctly. Not done for NAR AI, although since it's a smaller Blade Wave it may just end in Team Z. The bot itself is for Rival Rumble (prepare thine buttocks, kossokei) I put some slight wheel protectors. Not the most efficient but that's as much weight as I want to spend on wheel protection :O Also it must be the only poker with decent airtotal. It lasts through most of the 3 minutes, which is exceptional by my standards.
783
« on: May 04, 2016, 11:52:08 AM »
As for myself, I like having a chainsaw in the game, even though it's probably not going to end up very practical compared to sawblades. Cool, at least.
784
« on: May 04, 2016, 11:44:54 AM »
a few points:
-pinning is the main tactic for rammers/wammers, hammers and quite a bit of gutrippers. does the fair play rule bans them outright ? that seems unreasonable.
-equally, hit and run should be a valid tactic for fast bots. isn't back-and-forth what rammers do ? (May not be exactly hit and run, though)
Besides, hit and run has no point unless you are very fast and agile and your enemy isn't. also there are no ranged weapons, apparently, so it makes it even less worth. Not to mention that hit and run tactics will just let the opponent being rammed if you follow him closely.
-entrant liability seems quite harsh. besides i think if someone is always late, people will become aware of it and stop wanting him in tournaments, so it will be an unspoken rule.
785
« on: May 04, 2016, 11:25:34 AM »
>asks why r01 thinks unity is a bad choice for RA3
>asks why mnb doesnt like steam as a platform for distributing RA3
>warned for offtopic flaming
You weren't warned for flaming, but for offtopic. When a mod happens into a thread and says "enough offtopic" or something of that sort : can we not have arguments, accusations and off topic in here please.
you're supposed to stop any flaming or offtopic that happens in the thread. your post just after was offtopic. hence the warning. _______ R01, what core issue do you have with Unity? I just dont get why you think its not suitable for this game.
MNB, what issue do you have with Steam's DRM? I get that its against your principles to buy something and not have legal ownership of it, but functionally its identical to having the game on disc once you've logged into steam.
But if Steam ever goes down, you will never be able to play that game, which you payed for, again. With something like GOG, you can keep a copy in a disk and always have it.
wouldn't worry about it. Steam games get cracked all the time. Not sure RA3 will be much of a priority for the scene groups but you can always start Steam in offline mode and play. Unless you mean goes down as a company, which I don't see happening for a long time unless you know something I don't.
hey, MORE offtopic...
786
« on: May 04, 2016, 09:50:23 AM »
In the battlebots arena .py file. It's in the arenas folder. (Where else ?)
787
« on: May 04, 2016, 09:39:00 AM »
Watched the trailer. Appears to be a worthy Stock, v2.
Let's see what we can mod !
788
« on: May 04, 2016, 09:21:59 AM »
...i voted for a bot with piglets for drive lol
Eh, it was still a cool design. Despite splash being unappealing.
790
« on: May 04, 2016, 09:07:45 AM »
Is it just me who notices that you can build past 800KG's without an antiballast with this mod?
It's been posted in the OP. He used his no mass limits mod as well.
Oh, didn't know the OP had been updated.
Anyway, V2.0's taking things too far, especially in terms of DSL and Ironforge. Like, with Stock, I get it - gives some more life to the base game, and all - but for DSL, Ironforge and all that? ...Sheesh.
Wrong. This is what we've been waiting for. Now we can do artbots, walkers, IRL designs, and complex/crazy designs properly. All that we need is removal of the max sphere, if possible, and RA2 v2.0 with mods will be a worthy competitor to RA3. Maybe even superior to RA3.
791
« on: May 04, 2016, 04:20:46 AM »
>not thrackerzod
>three wedges on a MW
heh, i still couldn't guess it was you though.
792
« on: May 04, 2016, 04:19:29 AM »
dope
793
« on: May 04, 2016, 04:16:50 AM »
Is it just me who notices that you can build past 800KG's without an antiballast with this mod?
It's been posted in the OP. He used his no mass limits mod as well.
794
« on: May 03, 2016, 09:53:55 AM »
It's one week iirc.
795
« on: May 03, 2016, 07:31:03 AM »
If you think you've contributed in a serious, meaningful way to the development of RA2...
lol
796
« on: May 03, 2016, 07:19:27 AM »
User pages are meant for users that contribute in a meaningful way to RA2. (AI-ing, modding, tournaments, AI packs, etc.) Or the really old people/people who have marked GTM for a while.
797
« on: May 03, 2016, 07:10:31 AM »
Anger boom! V3 has shield and flamethrower, I post it later
i would just be here to remind that Not a lot anyone can say about this Wen, people don't generally build with cheatbot parts.
798
« on: May 03, 2016, 05:58:53 AM »
hovercrafts are easymode anyways.
799
« on: May 03, 2016, 04:47:40 AM »
oh, there was a change... alright, my bad.
It would have been more interesting on the BoD, though.
800
« on: May 03, 2016, 04:43:32 AM »
thrackerzod cannot read challenge rules, v3 : combat arena : bridge of doom edition
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ... 1267
|
Show Posts