This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Conraaa
Pages: 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ... 168
681
« on: March 24, 2013, 04:18:42 PM »
Have I saved DSL realistic from the jaws of death yet?  The other half of Team Tarot. Just as long as it doesn't get killed by it's teammate it should be fine.
682
« on: March 23, 2013, 04:33:06 PM »
 One half of my third team, Team Tarot, for my tourney.
683
« on: March 22, 2013, 12:59:51 PM »
 My team for BB6. I know i'm reusing a few bots but still. SHW: GIRL U WANT HW: Eighth Day 2 MW: Crocodile Rock LW: Something For The Weekend
684
« on: March 22, 2013, 08:57:42 AM »
I think a better system would be to have an annual "Bots Of The Year" vote. Where you vote for any bot made in the past year and any that garners 50% or more of the vote is inducted, with no limit on numbers and a few categories like Stock, DSL, DSL Realistic, Custom etc.
Like a hall of fame but not. Then we could also have an inaugural vote for robots made beforehand listed under "Classics" or something. So the older bots are recognized but the new breed isn't forgotten either.
If the above post makes sense.
685
« on: March 21, 2013, 04:12:30 PM »
I don't really see much point, to be fair. The old guard (RPB, NWB, AC, ERupt, Trinity et al) will garner interest and any new ideas would be dismissed for not being around long enough or something. It would just be a repeat of every Hall of Fame before.
686
« on: March 21, 2013, 04:06:53 PM »
Possible Lw for BB6. Pending skinning.  I do hope the name isn't an omen.
687
« on: March 21, 2013, 03:41:20 PM »
Just removed the quality control rule, and added a rule stating that all robots entered must not have been in any of my previous tournaments.
I'm starting to make my entries for this, but at my current robot building rate this thing will be starting in 2014.
688
« on: March 21, 2013, 01:38:07 PM »
I'll get around to sending Rhinocratic Oaths for this I swear.
689
« on: March 20, 2013, 03:23:24 PM »
Bored of arguing with venko now. Time to build. 
690
« on: March 19, 2013, 05:16:02 PM »
You forgot to put a rule in and didn't notice until it's too late, Venko.
The only thing that I didn't noticed is how people can interpret the word "bot" into "multi bots"...
Multibots have been around since the dawn of man, quite frankly. BBEANS 2 back in the day being a notable example ( Sabre.) In general, if the arena is capable of taking 4 robots, and the rules specifically don't state "No Multibots Allowed", then it's safe to say that you can enter a multibot into a tournament. I've entered multibots into BOTMS where it hasn't said anything about multibots and ACAMS has let it fly just fine. It's an unwritten law, if you will. An unwritten law that doesn't need changing, thank you very much.
691
« on: March 19, 2013, 03:52:00 PM »
Oh, vets are fine, just as long as they can pull their act together and not try to pull the rug from under peoples feet by changing the rules for no real reason.
You forgot to put a rule in and didn't notice until it's too late, Venko. Everyone does it, i've done it. You just have to live with it.
692
« on: March 19, 2013, 01:47:07 PM »
I love that HW Multibot, nice work on all of them.
693
« on: March 19, 2013, 12:48:04 PM »
This small thing, that was supposed to be not a big deal, went too far (thanks to some people). I'm putting an end to this...
...I mean if clickbeetle asked for that everyone would respect his request wouldn't they?...
The biggest truth, that I read after my comeback. This hypocrites would instantly agree, if he asks.
First of all, I don't want this rule for me, I want it to protect all the good builders, so if someone is against it, maybe he want to do that kind of stealing stuff...
"The bots involved in this tournament will be included in an AI pack."
Look how simple and fast to achieve is. It will not force the people to not enter, they will just know and that's it.
...by saying your bots are too good for us...
I never said that, it's You posting an opinion...
...if you are REALLY that bothered about it, just put that line in your pm or however you send your bots...
I don't want this, no need, just a info in the OP is enough.
Now the truth. What I fear is not the host stealing my bots, or people cloning them by pics. The thing I'm worried is the direct stealing of the bot file from the AI pack after the tournament from a good builder by a lame builder (mostly in stock where not all people can stack that good). Imagine this theoretical situation : You spend hours and hours to do some uber stacking (MidF for example, 2 blacks + CB, 2 stacked snappers, all this in a perfectly small chassis) then You submit it for a tournament. The tournament is over, the AI pack is released without your knowledge, and then someone instead of cloning this bot by pic, used directly your bot file or with insignificant modifications and enter the next tournament and win it. You worked on it for hours, he have it for 5 sec. Some people don't care if someone will find out, as long as they win. If You don't find this disturbing, You are either a pathetic builder or stupid? This simple line I posted on the upper lines, will eliminate this with an ease. I'm still fighting for this, as long as I'm entering tournaments, when I stop enter tournaments and release all my bots they can do whatever they want. I don't build for hours just someone to steal mine or someone else work for a seconds. Instead, I get "attention seeker", "arrogant ass" and so...
I didn't know that this kind of stuff actually happened to Ianh. So we have the first case of this.
Also, when I made a damn good bot, and after testing it, I found that it's extremly good, of course I wouldn't show it to the most people, but keep it for ownage. And I have some of these, most stock builders don't innovate, just copy+paste.
Ianh05 is way smarter than You, if You ask me... And You look like a trolls to me, that don't have anything better to do than grudge for nothing and trolling people.
...if you are REALLY that bothered about it, just put that line in your pm or however you send your bots...
I don't want this, no need, just a info in the OP is enough.
Wait, so you don't want this, and it's seemingly evident not many other people are keen on it?
694
« on: March 18, 2013, 05:48:33 PM »
Just played a bit of Yu-Gi-Oh with my Jurrac deck on DN. You know when kids made up their own cards that couldn't be beaten? It was pretty much like that. I hope they had fun, at least.
695
« on: March 18, 2013, 02:46:06 PM »
I'm game, my car of choice has to be the Lada 21074
696
« on: March 17, 2013, 06:24:51 PM »
Before I go any further, what is this evidence material you speak of? We're big boys, we can handle the truth. The reason no one ever asks this in the initial tourney lines is because hardly anyone releases tourney ai packs! It's no good alienating people from a tourney over something that may never get made. Yes, I am complaining about your complaining. I'm of the opinion that "If it isn't broken, don't fix it". This community has been running tournaments just fine for years without incident. You, on the other hand, vanished for a fair while and now that you're back on the radar? It looks to me like you're trying to find some imaginary problem to complain about just so people don't forget you exist again. As a collective, if there is something we had all missed in the system, it would have been found a while ago. And quite frankly, you asking tourney hosts to delete your robots off of their hard drives if the tourney doesn't go ahead could be seen as insulting to the tourney host. If you want to make sure that they don't pass off your work as their own? Showcase it! You're already trusting them to record fair matches and not rig the thing, so why can't you trust them with your .bot file? In a nutshell, it's a non problem that doesn't need tweaking. I'm all for people posting new ideas; that's what makes the forums go around. But please, don't make your opinion sound like the majority. And what did my original post contribute? Well, it stated the obvious and provoked you to dust off the good old "im entitled to my opinion. Dont care about You..." argument, which is always good for a read. I do hope this post answered your questions in much the same way you didn't answer MassimoV's.
697
« on: March 17, 2013, 02:09:34 PM »
It's amazing, Venko. All these things that no one has ever complained about you seem to hate with a burning passion.
698
« on: March 15, 2013, 04:06:12 PM »
Etek Drive Flying Guillotine
699
« on: March 15, 2013, 03:44:44 PM »
Everytime I look at that picture I think one half of the wheels are missing.
Looks nice though, I'd probably get rid of the beater bar on the end of the DSL bar and switch it out for a couple of alu/tite extenders though.
700
« on: March 14, 2013, 04:04:18 PM »
Yea boiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Pages: 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ... 168
|
Show Posts