This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Merrick
2081
« on: June 22, 2013, 08:54:48 AM »
ERMHAGERD U HAVNT DUN TUFF AS NAILS YET !1!1!1!1!!1!!!!!11!!!
2082
« on: June 22, 2013, 08:51:25 AM »
You could just reskin an old robot. That's what I may have to do, I'll have very little time today to actually build anything.
Then again, I do have a lot of RW-inspired designs.....
2083
« on: June 22, 2013, 06:44:20 AM »
Pretty sure that just because something is part of a specific culture, doesn't automatically make it a good thing.
2084
« on: June 21, 2013, 10:45:15 PM »
hey you said you would leave for 12 days
he liiiiiiiiiiiied
2085
« on: June 21, 2013, 12:10:57 PM »
Invertible HS are kinda dull.
I did consider it, but I enjoy building flippers.
2086
« on: June 21, 2013, 11:39:41 AM »
It's incredibly hard to take you seriously when you smiley spam the end of your rant.
2087
« on: June 21, 2013, 10:39:47 AM »
Awesome, I'll be able to whip up an entry tomorrow evening then.
Gotta decide between another Steg sequel, a Behemoth upgrade, or a rear-hinged Firestorm....
2088
« on: June 21, 2013, 07:18:07 AM »
I could make myself available as a judge if I'm not back in time to meet the deadline.
2089
« on: June 21, 2013, 05:27:33 AM »
(Image removed from quote.)
(Image removed from quote.)
This is my Robot for the new IRL tourney "Tusslers 3". It Is very Real, Thanks. I made sure to give it a large supply of BAttery so it can keep going for long time, and gave it powerful Piglet (c) Brand Drive Motors. It has 5 Large Controll Boards and 1 Micro control Board so in cAse 1 Breaks the other 5 will still work.
Bot of the year. Everybody go home now, we're done. GG.
2090
« on: June 21, 2013, 05:16:19 AM »
Picture seems a little dark. Can't pick out much detail to it.
2091
« on: June 20, 2013, 02:40:35 PM »
What's the policy for hingewedges? are they allowed?
Good question. Massimo said he might be limiting them during BB6.
2092
« on: June 20, 2013, 02:37:24 PM »
Mmmm, ant-filled jammie dodger.
Adds flavour and protein.
2093
« on: June 20, 2013, 02:31:36 PM »
09, I think we were lied to....
2094
« on: June 20, 2013, 02:29:32 PM »
Sex on wheels. <3
2095
« on: June 20, 2013, 02:14:36 PM »
Troll level; Professional.
bad posting detected
It's actually true though... This guy is either a troll or double-account.
*cough*Merrick*cough*
You rang?
2096
« on: June 20, 2013, 04:35:05 AM »
It wasn't judged like Battlebots, it was done on the in-game points. Which isn't a very good way of doing it, hence why I gave him the win.
Also, why would it piss me off? I'm hardly Ian Lewis. :L
2097
« on: June 20, 2013, 04:25:20 AM »
Troll level; Professional.
2098
« on: June 20, 2013, 04:22:23 AM »
Holy crap, you need at least another 20????? Time to be a douche; - 13 Black
- Spawn Again
- Mute
- Kat 3
- Road Block
- Killertron
- Napalm
- Atomic
- Iron Awe 2.1
- Bulldog Breed
- Disc-O Inferno
- Kan Opener
- Raging Knightmare
- Onslaught
- SMIDSY
- Splinter
- Tsunami
(sorry)
2099
« on: June 20, 2013, 03:54:35 AM »
DAMAGE. (Weight of 4) 1-5 points x 4 = Score for Damage.
AGGRESSION. (Weight of 3) 1-5 points x 3 = Score for Aggression.
CONTROL. (Weight of 2) 1-5 points x 2 = Score for Control.
STYLE. (Weight of 1) 1-5 points x 1 = Score for Style.
So a robot that scored 2 on damage, 3 on aggression, 4 on control, and 3 on style would have 28 points.
If it's opponent scored 5 on damage, but 1 on aggression, 2 on control, and 2 on style, it would have 29 points, just winning on out damage caused, despite having lower overall marks.
2100
« on: June 19, 2013, 03:51:17 PM »
I'm literally going to have to poop out an entry in an hour or two, if I'm back in England in time.....
Challenge accepted.
|
Show Posts