Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Naryar

Pages: 1 ... 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 [76] 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 ... 1267
1501
Chatterbox / Re: I have... an apology to make.
« on: November 09, 2015, 05:41:58 AM »
You're a newb. Those sort of things happen.

Just do not let them define you.

1502
I am neutral about the whole necromancy thing. I mean some necromancy spells are good and some are less good.

Liches... well most of those are evil but if it's a nonevil, chill lich i'll be fine with it. Who knows maybe it may become a buddy after all.

About dancing liches... hell, that's cool. I would be like WTF but i would deal with it.

Asking for a friend, does anyone know of a lady into necrophilia?

...What. Do you want to become a lich (>implying there is such a thing lololol) so you can bone girls ? You know they don't dig the rotting undead thing, AND especially the paralysis touch attack ?

And yes, it's still necrophilia if they are undead.

1503
DSL TC Showcases / Re: battlebots247 Robot Showcase
« on: November 07, 2015, 06:03:53 AM »
most of your bots don't need that much batteries to work. also work on smaller chassis.

i have no idea what you are doing with multiextenders on the lw. is it stabilizers ? use metal sheets instead of multiextenders.

no really don't use outside multiextenders, they are very fragile and vulnerable. Besides they're somewhat ugly mixed up with flippermakers.

drum motors are extremely exposed, put them inside/use perm 80's inside the chassis/use eteks. also don't use steel 10.

Karnage needs more drive, or grippier wheels such as techno destructo's.


Yeah. It's fine to build DSL unrealistic if the result is bad-ass, but DSL unrealistic tournaments are even rarer than Starcore posts. And that's a whole level of rare.

Now that is rare!

starcore-sama answered my summons, my life is now complete

1504
Chatterbox / Re: Not ILLOGICAL FIGHTS but a different topic
« on: October 26, 2015, 08:43:03 AM »
playzooki, n00b whacking for no real reason ? what is he, the new edge wylde ?

1505
Discussion / Re: More total noob questions by TRB!
« on: October 23, 2015, 10:18:51 AM »
Why do I think that'd be ridiculously cool but insanely difficult to drive?

Because it is insanely difficult to drive. Ridiculously cool, well it is cool but not ridiculously.

Tournaments are AI these days...

1506
Discussion / Re: More total noob questions by TRB!
« on: October 23, 2015, 09:33:29 AM »
it's two different, lighter than usual robots entered into a tournament. the combined weight of both has to be in the allowed weighclass.

say a HW multibot is pretty much two middleweights.

no, you can't practically make two bots within the same chassis/bot file.

1507
Ironforge TC Showcases / Re: Zyro_Falcon's Ironforge Showcase
« on: October 23, 2015, 06:11:20 AM »
your designs may be all the same but you are refining it into something that looks good, is better build and most likely deadlier. good job !

1508
Stock Showcases / Re: RedAce's Stock Market
« on: October 23, 2015, 06:09:15 AM »
...pyscolone ?

1509
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Mystic2000 crap showcase - DSL version
« on: October 23, 2015, 04:46:48 AM »
not bad. I believe normal npc's with lighter wheels may be better tho.

1510
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Zyro_Falcon's DSL Showcase
« on: October 23, 2015, 04:40:55 AM »
you are in DSL, so you are supposed to build semirealistically.

https://gametechmods.com/forums/index.php?topic=12002

basically: nothing that makes the laws of physics scream in outrage

1511
Chatterbox / Re: :mrgreen:
« on: October 21, 2015, 01:20:22 PM »
He has been bumping quite a bunch of threads tho...

1512
Chatterbox / Re: :mrgreen:
« on: October 20, 2015, 06:46:01 PM »
Please stop bumping random threads for no good reason.

1513
Chatterbox / Re: Petition to demote Naryar
« on: October 20, 2015, 06:41:03 PM »
the rules would probably end up getting rid of andy anyway

You sure ? Cuz he has done many offenses against the rules and yet we haven't get rid of him yet.
..what

you can't ban him when he breaks the rules but you'll ban him personally because you don't like him

it's not ****ing personal. we have a 3 page thread on it in the moderator section and most people are with me on wanting to get rid of him.

should i quote ? should I post pics ?

when will you guys understand that he put most if not all of the moderator team against him quite a while ago ?

no, we didn't got rid of him because we were too lenient, but now trov isn't here to ban him permanently, or isn't willing. that is ALL.

1514
Chatterbox / Re: Petition to demote Naryar
« on: October 20, 2015, 06:36:09 PM »
They may be not enforced but we still need to get rid of andrew. Then there will be less sh**, and less offenses against rules anyways.

1515
Chatterbox / Re: Petition to demote Naryar
« on: October 20, 2015, 06:33:03 PM »
lol i like how badnik whines about andrew not being permabanned then when I try to solve the andrew problem he whines about me instead.
>dodges the craaig situation
Yes, I disagree with craaig cuz craaig is rule focused and I want to get rid of andy. So ?
From an objective moderator stand point, you can't just base your actions on what affects you personally or because you have a grudge with one member. I'm sure an argument to this is 'but it's Andy, it's okay'. No, it's not.

We ALL want to get rid of andy. ALL the moderator team. And most of the forum as well.

You have no idea what goes in the staff team, don't presume to judge me as if I was muting andrew due to personal dislike. No, I mute him cuz of all the sh** he did.

the rules would probably end up getting rid of andy anyway

You sure ? Cuz he has done many offenses against the rules and yet we haven't get rid of him yet.

1516
Chatterbox / Re: Petition to demote Naryar
« on: October 20, 2015, 06:27:49 PM »

1517
Chatterbox / Re: Petition to demote Naryar
« on: October 20, 2015, 06:26:49 PM »
Can you competently reply WITHOUT referring to Andrew?

No, because andrew is the whole point of me acting like that.

1518
Chatterbox / Re: Petition to demote Naryar
« on: October 20, 2015, 06:23:35 PM »
None of you seem to understand, huh ?

Trovaner isn't here, and isn't reacting to our calls of banning andrew, so I take the matter into my own hands. Because Andrew needs to be removed, he is harming this forum, and then we need to take care of the sh** that's going up in this forum, because andrew is harming it and is pushing other members to do that too.

But no, craaig and everyone else seems to be all lawful anal and complaining about "muh rules" instead.

You would prefer that I sit on my ass and do nothing while people flame and insult each other and sh** flies everywhere ? Cuz i'm not sure that's my job, as moderator.

I shall make a ruleset once this is all cleared up. I promise.


1519
Chatterbox / Re: Petition to demote Naryar
« on: October 20, 2015, 06:13:03 PM »
lol i like how badnik whines about andrew not being permabanned then when I try to solve the andrew problem he whines about me instead.
>dodges the craaig situation
Yes, I disagree with craaig cuz craaig is rule focused and I want to get rid of andy. So ?

1520
Chatterbox / Re: Petition to demote Naryar
« on: October 20, 2015, 06:00:38 PM »
lol i like how badnik whines about andrew not being permabanned then when I try to solve the andrew problem he whines about me instead.

Pages: 1 ... 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 [76] 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 ... 1267