Quote from: RedAce on April 19, 2016, 07:06:02 AMI wasn't ure what to think of it when I saw teasers for it. Before I saw ratings for it, I thought it would one of those "pretty visuals hiding a shallow story" movies. But now that people are going nuts for it, even with the 98% rating from Rotten Tomatoes, I might be very wrong. But, I might watch this movie one day, but I'm not gonna go crazy for it at the moment.It's not all that bad, more suspenseful than your average kids' movie, but still, it's disney, not lemony snicket, so don't expect anything resembling an unhappy ending. My question is, why of all movies this one?
I wasn't ure what to think of it when I saw teasers for it. Before I saw ratings for it, I thought it would one of those "pretty visuals hiding a shallow story" movies. But now that people are going nuts for it, even with the 98% rating from Rotten Tomatoes, I might be very wrong. But, I might watch this movie one day, but I'm not gonna go crazy for it at the moment.
I was turned off watching this movie due to the clear pandering to furries that I saw in the trailer, an' I don't like dat sheet.
On topic, this movie seems interesting enough for me to at least watch it illegally online. However, one thing I keep hearing is "Really good worldbuilding", if that's it's only selling point then i'm a bit worried. I want to be proven wrong, however.
some people in the forum may recognize what i am talking about
Quote from: Naryar on April 19, 2016, 05:49:05 PMsome people in the forum may recognize what i am talking aboutis it ponies
Those examples are terrible.
Of course, this looks like typical mindless cute, feel-good stuff, so nope.
Quote from: The Red Blur on April 19, 2016, 05:48:12 AMI was turned off watching this movie due to the clear pandering to furries that I saw in the trailer, an' I don't like dat sheet.I was turned off from watching Starwars Episode 7 because Chewbaka is clearly Disney pandering to furries. I bet you had to reach a bit for that oneI was turned off from watching Big Hero 6 because Baymax is clearly Disney pandering to people with an inflation fetish. That one is again very nit picky if not, just flat out bullsh**eI was turned off from watching Wreck-It Ralph because Disney is clearly pandering to basement dwelling neckbeards. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-jdP0ymYKY&t=9m55s
I'm afraid it's not a valid argument to use opinion when Red said it so matter-of-factly. He was imposing his opinion, not stating it, by insinuating that there was clear pandering to furries. It's fine for him to dislike a trailer if he believes there is pandering to furries but he shouldn't be stating it as if it's an objective fact.
im just waiting for meganerdbomb to come along and kick things into gear.
I have no issues with anthropomorphic animals, unless:-it becomes creepy-it becomes fetishized-fans of anthropomorphic animals bring them into unrelated forums/discussions-fans of anthropomorphic animals stir sh** and drama about other people not liking themsome people in the forum may recognize what i am talking aboutOf course, this looks like typical mindless cute, feel-good stuff, so nope.
Quote from: yugitom on April 20, 2016, 10:05:01 AMI'm afraid it's not a valid argument to use opinion when Red said it so matter-of-factly. He was imposing his opinion, not stating it, by insinuating that there was clear pandering to furries. It's fine for him to dislike a trailer if he believes there is pandering to furries but he shouldn't be stating it as if it's an objective fact.Kinda' sorta' what I was getting at.The movie only seems like its pandering, but it honestly isn't.Hell... Disney has always made movies about anthro animals/etc. Dunno' what makes those any different from Zootopia.
Quote from: J on April 21, 2016, 06:10:11 AMQuote from: yugitom on April 20, 2016, 10:05:01 AMI'm afraid it's not a valid argument to use opinion when Red said it so matter-of-factly. He was imposing his opinion, not stating it, by insinuating that there was clear pandering to furries. It's fine for him to dislike a trailer if he believes there is pandering to furries but he shouldn't be stating it as if it's an objective fact.Kinda' sorta' what I was getting at.The movie only seems like its pandering, but it honestly isn't.Hell... Disney has always made movies about anthro animals/etc. Dunno' what makes those any different from Zootopia.My post about Disney directly marketing to furries was deleted, but it was true and and this is what I was talking about. Not saying anything is wrong with that, and I think it was a smart marketing decision, but it is true.
Quote from: Scrap Daddy on April 26, 2016, 06:50:25 PMQuote from: J on April 21, 2016, 06:10:11 AMQuote from: yugitom on April 20, 2016, 10:05:01 AMI'm afraid it's not a valid argument to use opinion when Red said it so matter-of-factly. He was imposing his opinion, not stating it, by insinuating that there was clear pandering to furries. It's fine for him to dislike a trailer if he believes there is pandering to furries but he shouldn't be stating it as if it's an objective fact.Kinda' sorta' what I was getting at.The movie only seems like its pandering, but it honestly isn't.Hell... Disney has always made movies about anthro animals/etc. Dunno' what makes those any different from Zootopia.My post about Disney directly marketing to furries was deleted, but it was true and and this is what I was talking about. Not saying anything is wrong with that, and I think it was a smart marketing decision, but it is true.One of your posts was deleted?Fuking hell...But seriously. As long as it beat Frozen, who cares =D(Not saying Frozen was bad or anything; But it became quite large right off the bat)
Quote from: J on April 26, 2016, 08:56:03 PMQuote from: Scrap Daddy on April 26, 2016, 06:50:25 PMQuote from: J on April 21, 2016, 06:10:11 AMQuote from: yugitom on April 20, 2016, 10:05:01 AMI'm afraid it's not a valid argument to use opinion when Red said it so matter-of-factly. He was imposing his opinion, not stating it, by insinuating that there was clear pandering to furries. It's fine for him to dislike a trailer if he believes there is pandering to furries but he shouldn't be stating it as if it's an objective fact.Kinda' sorta' what I was getting at.The movie only seems like its pandering, but it honestly isn't.Hell... Disney has always made movies about anthro animals/etc. Dunno' what makes those any different from Zootopia.My post about Disney directly marketing to furries was deleted, but it was true and and this is what I was talking about. Not saying anything is wrong with that, and I think it was a smart marketing decision, but it is true.One of your posts was deleted?Fuking hell...But seriously. As long as it beat Frozen, who cares =D(Not saying Frozen was bad or anything; But it became quite large right off the bat)Please, ANYTHING with a decent story can beat frozen.