The General Chatter Thread.

[Gazea2]

I would LOVE to see what would happen if NFX was in charge of the country and a celeb annoyed him. :P

XD I have no idea what I would do. I'd definitely not bother with any of the photo opportunity and image crap, I'd just be getting on with my job, and making sure that the country isn't run into the ground.

Prime Minister NFX of Scotland?  :P

He'd do a better job than David Cameron.

Hey, we could be doing worse.
 
We could've had Salmond or Griffin.

Good point.

Well I could try...

Just be careful though...by the time it's finished, it'll probably have more swearing than a Dockyard in Ireland   

LOL

[NFX]

I would LOVE to see what would happen if NFX was in charge of the country and a celeb annoyed him. :P

XD I have no idea what I would do. I'd definitely not bother with any of the photo opportunity and image crap, I'd just be getting on with my job, and making sure that the country isn't run into the ground.

Prime Minister NFX of Scotland?  :P

He'd do a better job than David Cameron.

Hey, we could be doing worse.
 
We could've had Salmond or Griffin.

Good point.

Don't worry, there aren't that many lunatics in the country.

[GoldenFox93]

I would LOVE to see what would happen if NFX was in charge of the country and a celeb annoyed him. :P

XD I have no idea what I would do. I'd definitely not bother with any of the photo opportunity and image crap, I'd just be getting on with my job, and making sure that the country isn't run into the ground.

Prime Minister NFX of Scotland?  :P

He'd do a better job than David Cameron.

Hey, we could be doing worse.
 
We could've had Salmond or Griffin.

Good point.

Don't worry, there aren't that many lunatics in the country.

Thankfully- most people seem to be able to remember the times of right-wing political ideology gone mad, and how it didn't do the world any favours.
Still, at least we were one of the major factors in putting a stop to it   

[NFX]

Indeed we were. Skin colour or race is no determinant of the worth of a human, I reckon it's more to do with their views, their morals, their beliefs and suchlike. If they try to incite hatred because of a physical quirk that makes a person different from them, then I would consider them lower down the order. Same as in an argument, e.g. in a high school. The first side to turn to violence has immediately lost the argument, in my view.

[GoldenFox93]

Indeed we were. Skin colour or race is no determinant of the worth of a human, I reckon it's more to do with their views, their morals, their beliefs and suchlike. If they try to incite hatred because of a physical quirk that makes a person different from them, then I would consider them lower down the order. Same as in an argument, e.g. in a high school. The first side to turn to violence has immediately lost the argument, in my view.

Quoted for truth. I mean, it just disgusts me how even in this modern day and age, people are still automatically judged according to colour, race, gender, or orientation. It's particularly bad in Schoolyards- in some places, you're considered sub-human if you have red hair/freckles/glasses/Asperger's, or the like. Some of these people even actively enjoy inflicting pain on others for these factors.
 
Kids? Innocent? **** that.

[Hydro]

Indeed we were. Skin colour or race is no determinant of the worth of a human, I reckon it's more to do with their views, their morals, their beliefs and suchlike. If they try to incite hatred because of a physical quirk that makes a person different from them, then I would consider them lower down the order. Same as in an argument, e.g. in a high school. The first side to turn to violence has immediately lost the argument, in my view.

Quoted for truth. I mean, it just disgusts me how even in this modern day and age, people are still automatically judged according to colour, race, gender, or orientation. It's particularly bad in Schoolyards- in some places, you're considered sub-human if you have red hair/freckles/glasses/Asperger's, or the like. Some of these people even actively enjoy inflicting pain on others for these factors.
 
Kids? Innocent? **** that.

See, this is where we gather up the worst offenders and put them in an arena with one of the chainsaw guys from RE5.

[NFX]

Indeed we were. Skin colour or race is no determinant of the worth of a human, I reckon it's more to do with their views, their morals, their beliefs and suchlike. If they try to incite hatred because of a physical quirk that makes a person different from them, then I would consider them lower down the order. Same as in an argument, e.g. in a high school. The first side to turn to violence has immediately lost the argument, in my view.

Quoted for truth. I mean, it just disgusts me how even in this modern day and age, people are still automatically judged according to colour, race, gender, or orientation. It's particularly bad in Schoolyards- in some places, you're considered sub-human if you have red hair/freckles/glasses/Asperger's, or the like. Some of these people even actively enjoy inflicting pain on others for these factors.
 
Kids? Innocent? **** that.

Exactly. And this ties in with my celebrity rant two pages ago. My girlfriend's brother is eight years old, and he watches Hannah Montana with his hand down his trousers. How does she know? He left the ****ing door open.
 
The main reason that the stigma can be gotten away with, I feel, is that the people inciting it ALWAYS travel in packs, much like wolves do, and play the numbers game. It's pretty much the reason that there is no singular of "chavs", it's an entirely fictitious concept. If it was one against one, then they'd probably get their head kicked in.

[GoldenFox93]

Indeed we were. Skin colour or race is no determinant of the worth of a human, I reckon it's more to do with their views, their morals, their beliefs and suchlike. If they try to incite hatred because of a physical quirk that makes a person different from them, then I would consider them lower down the order. Same as in an argument, e.g. in a high school. The first side to turn to violence has immediately lost the argument, in my view.

Quoted for truth. I mean, it just disgusts me how even in this modern day and age, people are still automatically judged according to colour, race, gender, or orientation. It's particularly bad in Schoolyards- in some places, you're considered sub-human if you have red hair/freckles/glasses/Asperger's, or the like. Some of these people even actively enjoy inflicting pain on others for these factors.
 
Kids? Innocent? **** that.

Exactly. And this ties in with my celebrity rant two pages ago. My girlfriend's brother is eight years old, and he watches Hannah Montana with his hand down his trousers. How does she know? He left the ****ing door open.
 
The main reason that the stigma can be gotten away with, I feel, is that the people inciting it ALWAYS travel in packs, much like wolves do, and play the numbers game. It's pretty much the reason that there is no singular of "chavs", it's an entirely fictitious concept. If it was one against one, then they'd probably get their head kicked in.

And Chavs? They're the reason why I get frightened around small groups in public.

[lloopp D lloopp]

Indeed we were. Skin colour or race is no determinant of the worth of a human, I reckon it's more to do with their views, their morals, their beliefs and suchlike. If they try to incite hatred because of a physical quirk that makes a person different from them, then I would consider them lower down the order. Same as in an argument, e.g. in a high school. The first side to turn to violence has immediately lost the argument, in my view.

Quoted for truth. I mean, it just disgusts me how even in this modern day and age, people are still automatically judged according to colour, race, gender, or orientation. It's particularly bad in Schoolyards- in some places, you're considered sub-human if you have red hair/freckles/glasses/Asperger's, or the like. Some of these people even actively enjoy inflicting pain on others for these factors.
 
Kids? Innocent? **** that.

Exactly. And this ties in with my celebrity rant two pages ago. My girlfriend's brother is eight years old, and he watches Hannah Montana with his hand down his trousers. How does she know? He left the ****ing door open.
 
The main reason that the stigma can be gotten away with, I feel, is that the people inciting it ALWAYS travel in packs, much like wolves do, and play the numbers game. It's pretty much the reason that there is no singular of "chavs", it's an entirely fictitious concept. If it was one against one, then they'd probably get their head kicked in.

wat

[GoldenFox93]

Indeed we were. Skin colour or race is no determinant of the worth of a human, I reckon it's more to do with their views, their morals, their beliefs and suchlike. If they try to incite hatred because of a physical quirk that makes a person different from them, then I would consider them lower down the order. Same as in an argument, e.g. in a high school. The first side to turn to violence has immediately lost the argument, in my view.

Quoted for truth. I mean, it just disgusts me how even in this modern day and age, people are still automatically judged according to colour, race, gender, or orientation. It's particularly bad in Schoolyards- in some places, you're considered sub-human if you have red hair/freckles/glasses/Asperger's, or the like. Some of these people even actively enjoy inflicting pain on others for these factors.
 
Kids? Innocent? **** that.

Exactly. And this ties in with my celebrity rant two pages ago. My girlfriend's brother is eight years old, and he watches Hannah Montana with his hand down his trousers. How does she know? He left the ****ing door open.
 
The main reason that the stigma can be gotten away with, I feel, is that the people inciting it ALWAYS travel in packs, much like wolves do, and play the numbers game. It's pretty much the reason that there is no singular of "chavs", it's an entirely fictitious concept. If it was one against one, then they'd probably get their head kicked in.

wat

Just to show how far society has fallen these days  =/

[NFX]

He's from Glasgow. And a ned. That may explain something.
 
GF93 said that he gets frightened around large groups in public, I don't even go out. Partly because of the chavs, I'm not walking back to be confronted by a gang of hooded delinquents with half bottles of cider and kitchen knives, but mostly because I don't like idea of the club/pub/bar scene at all. Getting drunk purely for the purpose of getting drunk just seems ****ing stupid to me.

[madman3]

Indeed we were. Skin colour or race is no determinant of the worth of a human, I reckon it's more to do with their views, their morals, their beliefs and suchlike. If they try to incite hatred because of a physical quirk that makes a person different from them, then I would consider them lower down the order. Same as in an argument, e.g. in a high school. The first side to turn to violence has immediately lost the argument, in my view.

Quoted for truth. I mean, it just disgusts me how even in this modern day and age, people are still automatically judged according to colour, race, gender, or orientation. It's particularly bad in Schoolyards- in some places, you're considered sub-human if you have red hair/freckles/glasses/Asperger's, or the like. Some of these people even actively enjoy inflicting pain on others for these factors.
 
Kids? Innocent? **** that.

Exactly. And this ties in with my celebrity rant two pages ago. My girlfriend's brother is eight years old, and he watches Hannah Montana with his hand down his trousers. How does she know? He left the ****ing door open.
 
The main reason that the stigma can be gotten away with, I feel, is that the people inciting it ALWAYS travel in packs, much like wolves do, and play the numbers game. It's pretty much the reason that there is no singular of "chavs", it's an entirely fictitious concept. If it was one against one, then they'd probably get their head kicked in.

Funnily, the Chav population never bothers me. But I created a little scale on how likely someone is going to be an asshole.

Very Unpopular-Likely. Tend to group with each other but not to truly befriend, as they lack the social skills. Often violent, hence their poor social position.

Moderately Unpopular- Unlikely. Gets on with the very popular group due to apposing social ideas that amuse the other group. I would fit myself in this group.

Fairly popular- Very likely. Not popular enough to gain social benefit from communication and they tend to do violent acts more. They also listen to Nu-metal. F*ckers.

Very popular-Too well instated to bother with bullying, these people are popular enough to not require violence. Very unlikely, and tend to be very friendly to the unpopular groups because of their higher social position and potential mutual interests.

You guys agree with the scale? It's mostly been right at my school, but I go to a great school.

He's from Glasgow. And a ned. That may explain something.
 
GF93 said that he gets frightened around large groups in public, I don't even go out. Partly because of the chavs, I'm not walking back to be confronted by a gang of hooded delinquents with half bottles of cider and kitchen knives, but mostly because I don't like idea of the club/pub/bar scene at all. Getting drunk purely for the purpose of getting drunk just seems ****ing stupid to me.

I just ignore them. If they're there, they'll pick a fight with someone they'll feel like. If they chose me, I just ignore. If they bother me further, they get the middle finger. Any more, then it's a kick to the gentleman's.

[Hydro]

*looks up a few words*


I think I'd fall into the categories of "chav" (when in my "regular attire") or "loony", when I have decided to be crazy for the day. Which is 75% of days.

[G.K.]

Madman I don't fit in your scale.

[NFX]

I created a little scale on how likely someone is going to be an asshole.

Very Unpopular-Likely. Tend to group with each other but not to truly befriend, as they lack the social skills. Often violent, hence their poor social position.

Moderately Unpopular- Unlikely. Gets on with the very popular group due to apposing social ideas that amuse the other group. I would fit myself in this group.

Fairly popular- Very likely. Not popular enough to gain social benefit from communication and they tend to do violent acts more. They also listen to Nu-metal. F*ckers.

Very popular-Too well instated to bother with bullying, these people are popular enough to not require violence. Very unlikely, and tend to be very friendly to the unpopular groups because of their higher social position and potential mutual interests.

You guys agree with the scale? It's mostly been right at my school, but I go to a great school.

I'm somewhat indifferent towards it. It doesn't really account for "fake friends", or people who are only friends when it suits them. Normally those types of people tend to group together, and sometimes pretend to befriend somebody just so they can kick them back down again. I'd say it was more prevolent in the US than in Britain, but I'd still tie that into the Asshole-o-meter somehow.
 
Personally, I'd place myself kind of on the border between Very and Moderately unpopular. I'm not actually the best person in a face-to-face situation, I tended to just not piss people off and get on with my life.

[madman3]

I tend to treat to call "fake friends" Lurkers (not in the internet sense). They seem to have no real friends but those who they can charm best, and they just talk to whoever they feel like, then chose whether to Bully or be nice. They usually tend to suck. Due to the way they often socialise with other people of their position, they win the Fairly Popular label.

[Scorpion]

HAHAHA I probably fit into fairly poular, very douchey if any HAHAHAHAHAHA

no serious i'm dead inside ^_^

[madman3]

HAHAHA I probably fit into fairly poular, very douchey if any HAHAHAHAHAHA

no serious i'm dead inside ^_^

You don't listen to Nu-Metal so you still have my respect.
Wait...
You wouldn't?!

[Scrap Daddy]

what the hell are chavs? You make it sound like there are just groups of people that pick fights.

[NFX]

what the hell are chavs? You make it sound like there are just groups of people that pick fights.

Yep. That's pretty much all they do. Fight, smoke, drink, shag about. They more than likely left education as soon as they could, and that stuff's really all they're any good at.