Quote from: Serge on August 06, 2010, 05:38:38 PMQuote from: somestrangeguy on August 01, 2010, 07:47:54 AMQuote from: Serge on July 31, 2010, 12:52:41 PMI've had much less trouble with W7 than XP. I don't know what you guys are smoking.Also, DX11.My opinion too. Some things are still alittle hidden but i will find them when i do need them.I needed to upgrade because of Just Cause 2.Ah, Just Cause 2. What an epic game.Especially on max settings @1680x1050. I love my graphics card sometimes.an epic game indeed. i have better max settings @ 1920x1080 =Pthis makes me wonder, what graphics card do you have? i use a Sapphire Radeon HD5870 VAPOR-X 1GB. great card, but a b*tch to insert in the PC because of its size.
Quote from: somestrangeguy on August 01, 2010, 07:47:54 AMQuote from: Serge on July 31, 2010, 12:52:41 PMI've had much less trouble with W7 than XP. I don't know what you guys are smoking.Also, DX11.My opinion too. Some things are still alittle hidden but i will find them when i do need them.I needed to upgrade because of Just Cause 2.Ah, Just Cause 2. What an epic game.Especially on max settings @1680x1050. I love my graphics card sometimes.
Quote from: Serge on July 31, 2010, 12:52:41 PMI've had much less trouble with W7 than XP. I don't know what you guys are smoking.Also, DX11.My opinion too. Some things are still alittle hidden but i will find them when i do need them.I needed to upgrade because of Just Cause 2.
I've had much less trouble with W7 than XP. I don't know what you guys are smoking.Also, DX11.
Quote from: ACAMS on August 07, 2010, 06:23:15 PMQuote from: powerrave on August 07, 2010, 05:55:35 PMand i thought i was trying to make it not tooooo expensive -_-'but then why the lower resolution? Resolution is usually determined by your monitor....if you check, the max res of both of those cards is way better than either of you listed.Precisely. It's all my screen can support. I'm a poor and irish jew pollack.
Quote from: powerrave on August 07, 2010, 05:55:35 PMand i thought i was trying to make it not tooooo expensive -_-'but then why the lower resolution? Resolution is usually determined by your monitor....if you check, the max res of both of those cards is way better than either of you listed.
and i thought i was trying to make it not tooooo expensive -_-'but then why the lower resolution?
Quote from: Serge on August 07, 2010, 09:51:23 PMQuote from: ACAMS on August 07, 2010, 06:23:15 PMQuote from: powerrave on August 07, 2010, 05:55:35 PMand i thought i was trying to make it not tooooo expensive -_-'but then why the lower resolution? Resolution is usually determined by your monitor....if you check, the max res of both of those cards is way better than either of you listed.Precisely. It's all my screen can support. I'm a poor and irish jew pollack.poor, with a videocard like that!?1920x1080 is a most common res, but if higher is possible, then why don't they make screens that support it? or maybe there are screens that support higher, but are over-expensive. i just have a simple 22 inch HD screen.
My monitor is a 28" Acer with 1920 x 1200 resolution Here is what I wish I had got instead (except the 12ms Response Time sucks....mine is 3ms) http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/472427-REG/HP_Hewlett_Packard_EZ320A8_ABA_LP3065_30_Widescreen_LCD.html Here is what Serge needs http://www.adorama.com/EICG301WBK.html?sid=1281276027352405&utm_source=gbase&utm_medium=Shopping%20Site&utm_campaign=Other&utm_term=Other
acer is bad. for screens, Samsung is best.
http://www.adorama.com/EICG301WBK.html?sid=1281276027352405&utm_source=gbase&utm_medium=Shopping%20Site&utm_campaign=Other&utm_term=Other
4 Brook moo moo moo moo moo moo how old was the movie food for Louis Missouri man hustle full moon eager for blow blow
I just made myself the best 404 page ever:http://q3k.org/404page.html