Author Topic: smashysmashy's DSL crapcase  (Read 56372 times)

Offline Clickbeetle

  • *
  • Posts: 3375
  • Rep: 21
  • In Soviet Russia, bugs stomp YOU!
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Beetle Bros site
    • Awards
Re: smashysmashy's DSL crapcase
« Reply #300 on: January 08, 2012, 01:39:53 AM »
Small chassis only havoks with internal drive motors (usually).  Put the Copal on a multiextender or something and it should be fine.
 
Also, that bottom armor is nearly useless mounted on a skirt hinge.  It will just flex out of the way and bots will still hit your chassis.  It needs to be mounted so it can't move.

To lack feeling is to be dead, but to act on every feeling is to be a child.
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings

Offline smashysmashy

  • Posts: 2990
  • Rep: 0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: smashysmashy's DSL crapcase
« Reply #301 on: January 08, 2012, 03:03:25 AM »
Small chassis only havoks with internal drive motors (usually).  Put the Copal on a multiextender or something and it should be fine.
 
Also, that bottom armor is nearly useless mounted on a skirt hinge.  It will just flex out of the way and bots will still hit your chassis.  It needs to be mounted so it can't move.
Understood, thanks.

Offline smashysmashy

  • Posts: 2990
  • Rep: 0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: smashysmashy's DSL crapcase
« Reply #302 on: January 09, 2012, 02:34:31 PM »
Haven't got round to the shell spinner, all I can say is sorry, I'll get to it soon and in the interim time I thought I'd show this off:

Super Killy Death Bot Thing, or SKDBT for short. Plastic 3 and a chassis that took forever to make airtight. (Just a quick shout-out to NC for the awesome movepixel)











The setup was originally supposed to be Tite 1 and 13kg rubbers, but with the most airtight chassis possible I could only manage 249.9. An hour and a half down the drain.

Offline Badger

  • Permanent Artifact
  • Giga Heavyweight
  • Posts: 6313
  • Rep: 2
  • I wish to be with my people
  • Awards BOTM Winner Donated money for site hosting 2019
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: smashysmashy's DSL crapcase
« Reply #303 on: January 09, 2012, 02:36:15 PM »
Hmmm, it would be better if you moved the Vlad spike out for better reach.

How does it do in battle? how many Ants?
also lol at most toxic guy around calling others out on this sh**
Google Drive with my newer bots

Offline Squirrel_Monkey

  • Squirrel_Monkeyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 7587
  • Rep: 7
  • [Insert clever and witty comment here]
    • 0SquirrelMonkey0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: smashysmashy's DSL crapcase
« Reply #304 on: January 09, 2012, 02:39:02 PM »
BFE the chassis lower, mount the Mags unraised, use WaWs. Profit?
Better than GK since 2009.
I think SM is a pretty cool guy, eh builds unicycle-bots and doesn't afraid of anything

Offline smashysmashy

  • Posts: 2990
  • Rep: 0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: smashysmashy's DSL crapcase
« Reply #305 on: January 09, 2012, 02:47:11 PM »
BFE the chassis lower, mount the Mags unraised, use WaWs. Profit?
Haven't done BFE, don't really like BFE, tbh. May try if I can be bothered to learn.

Hmmm, it would be better if you moved the Vlad spike out for better reach.
No. I wanted the Vlad spike for one realistic (and tough) spike. I also didn't want it to reach out too far and look unwieldy.

How does it do in battle? how many Ants?
It's currently untested. And four.

So what I've done is spent a long time making a bad bot pointlessly when I could have BFE'd the chassis?   :embarr

Offline Squirrel_Monkey

  • Squirrel_Monkeyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 7587
  • Rep: 7
  • [Insert clever and witty comment here]
    • 0SquirrelMonkey0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: smashysmashy's DSL crapcase
« Reply #306 on: January 09, 2012, 02:53:03 PM »
BFE the chassis lower, mount the Mags unraised, use WaWs. Profit?
Haven't done BFE, don't really like BFE, tbh. May try if I can be bothered to learn.

Hmmm, it would be better if you moved the Vlad spike out for better reach.
No. I wanted the Vlad spike for one realistic (and tough) spike. I also didn't want it to reach out too far and look unwieldy.

How does it do in battle? how many Ants?
It's currently untested. And four.

So what I've done is spent a long time making a bad bot pointlessly when I could have BFE'd the chassis?   :embarr
No, the shape was best done in game. As for height BFE, look here: https://gametechmods.com/forums/index.php/topic,9216.msg460838.html#msg460838
Better than GK since 2009.
I think SM is a pretty cool guy, eh builds unicycle-bots and doesn't afraid of anything

Offline Virus Bomb

Re: smashysmashy's DSL crapcase
« Reply #307 on: January 09, 2012, 02:56:19 PM »
Go for a u-shaped chassis instead of the h-shaped chassis you have now and see if that helps.

Offline smashysmashy

  • Posts: 2990
  • Rep: 0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: smashysmashy's DSL crapcase
« Reply #308 on: January 09, 2012, 02:58:39 PM »
BFE the chassis lower, mount the Mags unraised, use WaWs. Profit?
Haven't done BFE, don't really like BFE, tbh. May try if I can be bothered to learn.

Hmmm, it would be better if you moved the Vlad spike out for better reach.
No. I wanted the Vlad spike for one realistic (and tough) spike. I also didn't want it to reach out too far and look unwieldy.

How does it do in battle? how many Ants?
It's currently untested. And four.

So what I've done is spent a long time making a bad bot pointlessly when I could have BFE'd the chassis?   :embarr
No, the shape was best done in game. As for height BFE, look here: https://gametechmods.com/forums/index.php/topic,9216.msg460838.html#msg460838
You, are awesome. Having a read now =3

Go for a u-shaped chassis instead of the h-shaped chassis you have now and see if that helps.
Before I rush blindly into this, what would this achieve?

Offline Virus Bomb

Re: smashysmashy's DSL crapcase
« Reply #309 on: January 09, 2012, 03:01:18 PM »
going with a u-shaped chassis weighs less than a h-shaped chassis iirc.

Offline smashysmashy

  • Posts: 2990
  • Rep: 0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: smashysmashy's DSL crapcase
« Reply #310 on: January 09, 2012, 03:02:28 PM »
going with a u-shaped chassis weighs less than a h-shaped chassis iirc.
But why? The volume would be identical.

Offline Squirrel_Monkey

  • Squirrel_Monkeyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 7587
  • Rep: 7
  • [Insert clever and witty comment here]
    • 0SquirrelMonkey0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: smashysmashy's DSL crapcase
« Reply #311 on: January 09, 2012, 03:03:04 PM »
going with a u-shaped chassis weighs less than a h-shaped chassis iirc.
But why? The volume would be identical.
It's all about surface area in RA2.
Better than GK since 2009.
I think SM is a pretty cool guy, eh builds unicycle-bots and doesn't afraid of anything

Offline Scrap Daddy

Re: smashysmashy's DSL crapcase
« Reply #312 on: January 09, 2012, 03:04:32 PM »
You act like this is the first time ra2 hasn't made sense

Offline smashysmashy

  • Posts: 2990
  • Rep: 0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: smashysmashy's DSL crapcase
« Reply #313 on: January 09, 2012, 03:06:36 PM »
going with a u-shaped chassis weighs less than a h-shaped chassis iirc.
But why? The volume would be identical.
It's all about surface area in RA2.
*facepalm*

<expletive>ing Gabriel Interactive.

You act like this is the first time ra2 hasn't made sense
You, sir, have a point.

RA2 puts the laws of physics into a room and farts in it.

Offline ty4er

Re: smashysmashy's DSL crapcase
« Reply #314 on: January 09, 2012, 03:21:43 PM »
is it meant to be irl
DSL Showcase
is this bot don't lost all razors in a fight before do a damage thought

Offline smashysmashy

  • Posts: 2990
  • Rep: 0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: smashysmashy's DSL crapcase
« Reply #315 on: January 09, 2012, 03:24:00 PM »
is it meant to be irl
Whoops, yes it is. Sorry =3

If I was going to make DSL Realistic I'd have used 2 NPC Fasts and hypnos

Offline Badnik96

  • tired of your shit
  • *
  • Posts: 17536
  • Rep: 3
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: smashysmashy's DSL crapcase
« Reply #316 on: January 09, 2012, 06:38:15 PM »
Skin looks cool.

Offline Reier

  • Rieir
  • *
  • Posts: 8569
  • Rep: 8
  • I GOT 3RD IN RAW1
    • https://www.youtube.com/c
  • Awards old BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: smashysmashy's DSL crapcase
« Reply #317 on: January 10, 2012, 10:43:48 AM »
going with a u-shaped chassis weighs less than a h-shaped chassis iirc.
But why? The volume would be identical.
It's all about surface area in RA2.

Actually, that would make sense IRL. More metal = more weight, it's not like there's anything inside the chassis to take up weight. Volume only matters in an aquarium or something.
ALERT- Another WS coming up...
voted best bot builder two times and counting babayy. the best ra2 builder who has never won an actual tournament match
ReiAI pack for Ironforge
My drawings, and my webcomics
Why online PVP will save RA2
The problem with competitive IRL in RA2
I'm fine with hugging reier

Offline Clickbeetle

  • *
  • Posts: 3375
  • Rep: 21
  • In Soviet Russia, bugs stomp YOU!
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Beetle Bros site
    • Awards
Re: smashysmashy's DSL crapcase
« Reply #318 on: January 15, 2012, 11:23:10 PM »
Actually in this case, a U chassis and an H chassis would weigh exactly the same.  All you're doing is sliding the middle segment forward or backward.
 
You will only save weight by bringing two of the "arms" of the H together into one thicker center arm, thus eliminating the gap in the middle.  The end result would be sort of a Y chassis (assuming you want to leave the front gap for the Vlad spike).

To lack feeling is to be dead, but to act on every feeling is to be a child.
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings

Offline smashysmashy

  • Posts: 2990
  • Rep: 0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: smashysmashy's DSL crapcase
« Reply #319 on: January 16, 2012, 02:43:47 PM »
Actually in this case, a U chassis and an H chassis would weigh exactly the same.  All you're doing is sliding the middle segment forward or backward.
 
You will only save weight by bringing two of the "arms" of the H together into one thicker center arm, thus eliminating the gap in the middle.  The end result would be sort of a Y chassis (assuming you want to leave the front gap for the Vlad spike).
Hmmmm, that's an idea. Might have a go.