Author Topic: CameraFan's DSL fail-palace (Read 16337 times)

MassimoV · « **Reply #80 on:** November 14, 2012, 03:07:01 PM »

Smaller chassis, bottom armor, more weapons on smaller disc.

CameraFan · « **Reply #81 on:** November 16, 2012, 01:03:57 PM »

Quote from: MassimoV on November 14, 2012, 03:07:01 PM

bottom armor

~~Halfplates like to say they're colliding with something when I put them on the bottom, I've only managed once.~~

Quote from: Clickbeetle on October 23, 2011, 10:15:21 PM

If the game tells you "baseplate components must fit inside the chassis" (most annoying error message in the game BTW) it means the chassis needs to be taller. Half sheets can't be attached to minimum-height chassises. I think the minimum for half sheets is 0.4something.

right, new version will be coming soon

CameraFan · « **Reply #82 on:** November 16, 2012, 02:07:25 PM »

dp

3 ants
no flails cuz havok

CameraFan · « **Reply #83 on:** November 17, 2012, 02:11:54 PM »

i make poopup

Naryar · « **Reply #84 on:** November 17, 2012, 02:33:18 PM »

moar speed and less underweight please

CameraFan · « **Reply #85 on:** November 17, 2012, 02:59:23 PM »

~~so to up to fast npcs i need to lose 0.1kg to still be in mw /cry~~

397.6

MassimoV · « **Reply #86 on:** November 17, 2012, 03:32:10 PM »

I'd say make the chassis shorter and use only ants and no battle packs. Good improvement though.

CameraFan · « **Reply #87 on:** November 18, 2012, 08:13:31 AM »

Poopup 3 coming soon
This is what happens when you give me antiballasts:

I'm sure it's nothing special but I like it so I put it on here.

CameraFan · « **Reply #88 on:** November 18, 2012, 02:42:00 PM »

Gah forgot to make poopup 3 and ended up making a hw popup instead

9 razors, lots of batts, bsg smalls, fast npcs, tite 3, UNDERWEIIIIIGHT

CameraFan · « **Reply #89 on:** November 19, 2012, 10:42:37 AM »

more shws

that one probably sucks in a battle but looks kinda cool

this ones like 100kg underweight

Kossokei · « **Reply #90 on:** November 19, 2012, 02:05:40 PM »

Quote from: CameraFan on November 19, 2012, 10:42:37 AM

more shws
(Image removed from quote.)
that one probably sucks in a battle but looks kinda cool
(Image removed from quote.)
this ones like 100kg underweight

Is that... an IRL SHW? o _ o

Tweedy · « **Reply #91 on:** November 19, 2012, 02:11:29 PM »

Quote from: Kossokei on November 19, 2012, 02:05:40 PM

Quote from: CameraFan on November 19, 2012, 10:42:37 AM
more shws
(Image removed from quote.)
that one probably sucks in a battle but looks kinda cool
(Image removed from quote.)
this ones like 100kg underweight
Is that... an IRL SHW? o _ o

They're not that rare man.

Philippa · « **Reply #92 on:** November 19, 2012, 02:13:13 PM »

Quote from: Kossokei on November 19, 2012, 02:05:40 PM

Quote from: CameraFan on November 19, 2012, 10:42:37 AM
more shws
(Image removed from quote.)
that one probably sucks in a battle but looks kinda cool
(Image removed from quote.)
this ones like 100kg underweight
Is that... an IRL SHW? o _ o

They're pretty common.

Kossokei · « **Reply #93 on:** November 19, 2012, 02:20:48 PM »

Quote from: Kurt Wylde on November 19, 2012, 02:13:13 PM

Quote from: Kossokei on November 19, 2012, 02:05:40 PM
Quote from: CameraFan on November 19, 2012, 10:42:37 AM
more shws
(Image removed from quote.)
that one probably sucks in a battle but looks kinda cool
(Image removed from quote.)
this ones like 100kg underweight
Is that... an IRL SHW? o _ o
They're pretty common.

Yeah, I just only realized how stupid that made me sound... But still I think that's the only IRL SHW that I've actually seen that actually looked like a SHW.

Meh, I've gone insane. The SHW looks cool.

Conraaa · « **Reply #94 on:** November 19, 2012, 02:38:42 PM »

Stupid question, but is it a hammer bot or a rammer? (The SHW)

CameraFan · « **Reply #95 on:** November 19, 2012, 02:39:35 PM »

It's a rammer.

Quote from: Kossokei on November 19, 2012, 02:20:48 PM

Quote from: Kurt Wylde on November 19, 2012, 02:13:13 PM
Quote from: Kossokei on November 19, 2012, 02:05:40 PM
Quote from: CameraFan on November 19, 2012, 10:42:37 AM
more shws
(Image removed from quote.)
that one probably sucks in a battle but looks kinda cool
(Image removed from quote.)
this ones like 100kg underweight
Is that... an IRL SHW? o _ o
They're pretty common.
Yeah, I just only realized how stupid that made me sound... But still I think that's the only IRL SHW that I've actually seen that actually looked like a SHW.

Meh, I've gone insane. The SHW looks cool.

They're both SHWs, the spinner is 100kg underweight though.

CameraFan · « **Reply #96 on:** November 23, 2012, 01:56:47 PM »

plastic 1
yes, i did use ford wheels

Reier · « **Reply #97 on:** November 23, 2012, 02:33:47 PM »

I CAN VOUCH FOR HIM HE DID USE FORD WHEELS

Reminds me of those undercutters in like 2008-09

CameraFan · « **Reply #98 on:** November 23, 2012, 02:58:50 PM »

Quote from: Reier on November 23, 2012, 02:33:47 PM

I CAN VOUCH FOR HIM HE DID USE FORD WHEELS

THAT IS VERY TRUE
now for some overkill drive trains with really bad weapons

124.6

both use NPCFs

Mr. AS · « **Reply #99 on:** November 23, 2012, 03:01:58 PM »

the aw is 4.6 kg off