You might want to separate the inductees into sections...for example "Tournament Winners" would contain bots like Hazardous Contraption and Flaming Whizzer, "Robot Milestones" ones like EMERGENCY and E-Rupt, etc.
Which makes me wonder...does anyone have a file for the Drumblebee shown in the Hall of Fame? I'd like to study it and how to improve my own Stock Drums.
Another suggestion would to be to do away with the "honourable mentions." Having them doesn't make any sense whatsoever, since merely having them is placing more bots in the Hall. Either they're famous enough to be there, or they're not. There's no real in-between.
wait what?I was running a second one, and like 2 people voted...I was planning to bring it back soon too...*sighs*
Soooooo... can we campaign certain bots? or would that be considered tacky? Maybe start a thread for people to make HOF suggestions? Might be kinda fun for lively debate and I don't really see why people need to write up why they are nominating a bot when majority vote is going to rule over reason anyways. I guess I got confused... I thought the nominations were going to put the bots into a master list for voting or something. My Bad.
I figured pure ballot voting would work just as well and be simpler.
Quote from: Urjak on June 01, 2011, 09:23:36 PMI figured pure ballot voting would work just as well and be simpler.Well.. now all you have is what we already had..Your basically restarting the list now because you don't agree with the placement of some..I mean no offense but your really not improving the system much.. you just going to get the same results split into 2..