Vote BOTM Oct 2012

[ACAMS]

Vote for your favorite Stock HW bot

Vote #1 or #2

#1



#2

[Jonzu95]

And we already have a winner. No need to have the voting. :P

[Conraaa]

And before anyone says anything, kudos to them for actually entering. This seemed like a tough BOTM to build for.

[Jonzu95]

And before anyone says anything, kudos to them for actually entering. This seemed like a tough BOTM to build for.

Agreed. This BOTM didn't fit me at all.

[JoeBlo]

I remember when you used to have to try to win not just have an easy 50-50 shot handed to you :P (kidding, just messing with you guys that entered)

But BOTM is looking seriously sad the last few months.. maybe I should learn how to play this game again..

[J]

I remember when you used to have to try to win not just have an easy 50-50 shot handed to you :P

Joe, thing is, this BOTM was just....
....
Weird.
Yea, lets go with that.

[Squirrel_Monkey]

Wow, #1 better win this.

[Philippa]

Derp, I forgot to finish my entry...

Voting for 2 obviously. :) Sorry, but 1 is just too pixelly.

[09090901]

respect to #2 for beating ItIV.

[Fracture]

I like #2 a lot better, but I'm surprised ACAMS accepted it.

and would wamming racks also count as a ramming weapon ?

What is a wamming rack?

like a bunch of irons or razors or whatever pointing up at an angle instead of facing directly at the opponent

like so
(Image removed from quote.)

No, but the ram plates will pass because they do damage!

[NFX]

I like #2 a lot better, but I'm surprised ACAMS accepted it.

and would wamming racks also count as a ramming weapon ?

What is a wamming rack?

like a bunch of irons or razors or whatever pointing up at an angle instead of facing directly at the opponent

like so
(Image removed from quote.)

No, but the ram plates will pass because they do damage!

That robot sucks eggs.
 
But seriously, #2 has the spin, burst and static weapons required. Disqualifying it at this late stage gives #1 a free win. And apologies if I'm sounding rude, but there's no way #1 is deserving of a win, in my view.

[J]

DAMN YOU, IAN, WHY DIDN'T YOU FINISH THAT FRANKEN-BOT!?

[Badger]

Does 1 really have 36 maces? I find that very hard to believe.

[090901]

Does 1 really have 36 maces? I find that very hard to believe.

Look to be 18 maces per tribar.

[Fracture]

Oh #1 maybe shouldn't have been accepted either.

To clarify the rule

RULES:

• MUST have at least two rammer weapons (2 separately mounted weapons)

You CANNOT have both rammer weapons on one extender, T, or anchor!

I don't know what separately mounted means, but if you want to get really specific the two ramming razors on #1 are on the same baseplate anchor.

Which brings up the question, what if there was a BOTM and no one entered? :P

[Mr. AS]

#2 has facespinners/jugglers and not hs

b&

uh nvm that i didnt read the rules

#2 still looks alot cooler than #1, probably pwnator

[ACAMS]

I like #2 a lot better, but I'm surprised ACAMS accepted it.

and would wamming racks also count as a ramming weapon ?

What is a wamming rack?

like a bunch of irons or razors or whatever pointing up at an angle instead of facing directly at the opponent

like so
(Image removed from quote.)

No, but the ram plates will pass because they do damage!

Not only does it have ramming weapons facing forward .......




They are mounted on separate anchors like I expected.

#2 has facespinners/jugglers and not hs

b&

What has HS got to do with it?

• MUST have at least two spinner weapons (2 spin motors)
• MUST have at least two hammer weapons (2 burst motors)
• MUST have at least two rammer weapons (2 separately mounted weapons)

[ACAMS]

I like #1 best, even tho he twisted the rules a little.

[MassimoV]

But seriously, #2 has the spin, burst and static weapons required. Disqualifying it at this late stage gives #1 a free win. And apologies if I'm sounding rude, but there's no way #1 is deserving of a win, in my view.

Stop defending it. We know you made it  .

[Kossokei]

Voted #2.

Good job keeping something so complex at least somewhat aesthetically pleasing. I wouldn't think it'd look as easy, ever, as whoever made it made it look.