Total Members Voted: 42
Voting closed: October 01, 2012, 06:39:10 AM
And before anyone says anything, kudos to them for actually entering. This seemed like a tough BOTM to build for.
I remember when you used to have to try to win not just have an easy 50-50 shot handed to you :P
I think SM is a pretty cool guy, eh builds unicycle-bots and doesn't afraid of anything
DSL-IRL is the libtard’s meta. Go drink more soylent, retard! #BLUELIVESMATTER
and would wamming racks also count as a ramming weapon ?
Quote from: Mr. AwesumSauce on September 05, 2012, 02:39:15 PMQuote from: ACAMS on September 05, 2012, 02:35:02 PMWhat is a wamming rack?like a bunch of irons or razors or whatever pointing up at an angle instead of facing directly at the opponentlike so(Image removed from quote.)No, but the ram plates will pass because they do damage!
Quote from: ACAMS on September 05, 2012, 02:35:02 PMWhat is a wamming rack?like a bunch of irons or razors or whatever pointing up at an angle instead of facing directly at the opponentlike so(Image removed from quote.)
What is a wamming rack?
I like #2 a lot better, but I'm surprised ACAMS accepted it.Quote from: Mr. AwesumSauce on September 05, 2012, 02:04:49 PMand would wamming racks also count as a ramming weapon ?Quote from: ACAMS on September 05, 2012, 03:57:52 PMQuote from: Mr. AwesumSauce on September 05, 2012, 02:39:15 PMQuote from: ACAMS on September 05, 2012, 02:35:02 PMWhat is a wamming rack?like a bunch of irons or razors or whatever pointing up at an angle instead of facing directly at the opponentlike so(Image removed from quote.)No, but the ram plates will pass because they do damage!
also lol at most toxic guy around calling others out on this sh**
Does 1 really have 36 maces? I find that very hard to believe.
To clarify the ruleQuote from: ACAMS on September 05, 2012, 11:32:18 AM RULES:MUST have at least two rammer weapons (2 separately mounted weapons) You CANNOT have both rammer weapons on one extender, T, or anchor!
RULES:MUST have at least two rammer weapons (2 separately mounted weapons)
#2 has facespinners/jugglers and not hsb&
But seriously, #2 has the spin, burst and static weapons required. Disqualifying it at this late stage gives #1 a free win. And apologies if I'm sounding rude, but there's no way #1 is deserving of a win, in my view.