Oh I'll be doing some banging.......
there is basically NO ADMINISTRATION since ACAMS "retired" and handed the forum over to Trovaner who did a few cool things and then kinda vanished.
Since then the forums have been controlled by the mods, Craaig and Naryar being the only active ones. Naryar's been a mod for so long that he actually got most of the moderator rank's powers after going on a banning spree a few years ago. This has reduced his and Craaig's ability to control the place massively, meaning asswipes like Andy can go around spouting crap about race hate and tasteless holocaust jokes without fear of ban or even mute. Now mods can still mute, the problem is that Naryar doesn't seem to know how rules work, which is whipping craaig into a frenzy, as seen by the two screen caps below (credit to Craaig)tl;dr naryar's power fantasy is nearly single handedly killing the forum
lol i like how badnik whines about andrew not being permabanned then when I try to solve the andrew problem he whines about me instead.
Quote from: Naryar on October 20, 2015, 06:00:38 PMlol i like how badnik whines about andrew not being permabanned then when I try to solve the andrew problem he whines about me instead.>dodges the craaig situation
Quote from: helloface199 on October 20, 2015, 06:01:50 PMQuote from: Naryar on October 20, 2015, 06:00:38 PMlol i like how badnik whines about andrew not being permabanned then when I try to solve the andrew problem he whines about me instead.>dodges the craaig situation I disagree with craaig cuz craaig is rule focused
Quote from: helloface199 on October 20, 2015, 06:01:50 PMQuote from: Naryar on October 20, 2015, 06:00:38 PMlol i like how badnik whines about andrew not being permabanned then when I try to solve the andrew problem he whines about me instead.>dodges the craaig situation Yes, I disagree with craaig cuz craaig is rule focused and I want to get rid of andy. So ?
the rules would probably end up getting rid of andy anyway
Yes, I disagree with craaig cuz craaig is rule focused and I want to get rid of andy. So ?
I'm sure an argument to this is 'but it's Andy, it's okay'. No, it's not.
isnt that the point of running the forumhaving rulesthe rules would probably end up getting rid of andy anyway
But no, craaig and everyone else seems to be all lawful anal and complaining about "muh rules" instead.