JoshChristian99?????

[russian roulette]

http://www.youtube.com/user/JoshChristian99 Tell me what you think. This kid embarrasses me from being catholic!

[System32]

You have never heard of that uh, dammit...

Ah! VenomFangX!

That guy. Made some dude suicidal, scammed about 100 people.... sh** like that.

[Sparkey98]

god is sobbing
 
I want to beat that kid sensless with a bat
 
did you see his violent video games video? he clearly said insted of playing them you should be practesing raligon
 
I'm embarised to say I'm christan

[frezal]

I'm embarised to say I'm christan

You are not a Christian. Not until you are capable of independent, rational thought can you claim to be a Christian. As of now, you are the child of Christians.


The same applies to younguns who claim to be Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Atheist, Jedi, Zoroastrian, Pagan, etc.

[System32]

silly kid. just copying what he hears at church...

[frezal]

JoshChristian's profile says it all. He's attended a private Christian school (indoctrination center) and has been home schooled (even more of an indoctrination center).

[russian roulette]

Still his hypocritical/stubborn behavior is making hell of 4chan and youtube members.

[Pwnator]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pP9UZwidP0w&feature=channel

Hahahaha. God on his side. To take down 4chan. Please. :P

But I don't blame him. This never would have happened if his parents were cautious enough. Then again, this wouldn't be necessary if people were smart enough to steer away from religion. :P

[G.K.]

Don't let Click read that.

[Pwnator]

But that doesn't mean that religion is totally bad. I did read the Bible when I was a kid. But I always treated it like any other fictional book. Only this one's more inspirational.


And tons of terrible events of different scales wouldn't have happened if people didn't take religion to the extreme.

Here's an example.

[Naryar]

Religion isn't totally bad because Christianism is a decent enough philosophy... but still there is absolutely no logical proof that God exists and i doubt he does. Now it CAN but i will stay agnostic if i don't have any kind of illumination.

The Bible, Lord Of The Rings, Harry Potter, Twilight.

...the Bible and 3 books which are pretty much anathema to a large part of Christians ? HAHAHAHAH

My Chemical Romance

Yet another emo faggot.

[G.K.]

Agnosticism is the way forward

[Pwnator]

Agnosticism is the way forward

Then again, some people also take it too far such that it somewhat becomes a religion as well. >.<

[G.K.]

Good point.

[Naryar]

Agnosticism is the way forward

Then again, some people also take it too far such that it somewhat becomes a religion as well. >.<

Same thing for atheism :P

[Natef]

I did a commentary on that user.

[Reier]

JoshChristian's profile says it all. He's attended a private Christian school (indoctrination center) and has been home schooled (even more of an indoctrination center).

Good for him.
Heh. Like public school isn't.
 

[Madiaba]

You guys are very ignorant products of a post-modern materialistic relativism. You don't understand people very well either, starting with yourselves.  Be careful of what you set as your paradigm in life,... it's easy to shoot from the hip.  Evolution is far from an indisputable fact, and has several issues.  But that's another topic; right now I'm talking about Epistemology:
 
As I had previously pointed out to Jeff (which he apparently doesn't yet understand), 'just talk facts' and remove the 'emotional coercion' for non-supportive responders....Ad Hominem.  One should just state facts, and let others think for themselves...without the coercionary tactics.  Like the main tactic of the Inquisition, you're adding and then imposing your own anger onto non-conformists. Jefferey's own little 'hell' for non-conformists.
 
If you're doing the added coercion on purpose, then I feel sad for you, for you are a blatant hypocrite.  If you're not doing it on purpose, then you have some internal baggage that needs to be dealt with, that would 'desire a certain paradigm'...or else.  No further (unbiased) learning can take place until this is removed.

As far as 'indoctrination', it's true that it happens all of the time to manipulate supportive responses.  Coming across 'hard' and 'brash' is used often as an 'opiate of the masses' also, to control others mind-sets (making it uncomfortable for them to disagree), else they'll be demeaned or ridiculed.  Frezal, think about it; easily over 90% of your comments are finding a fault or derogatory to someone.  If they're ignorant, then help them up don't slam them down.  Emotions cloud logic in self and when imposed on others. Therefore, just state the facts and let them stand, for facts stand on their own...  No need to alter their comfort level, unless there's ulterior motive to 'support a desired reality' (manipulating).

Any good researcher/scientist, who wants to objectively learn some aspects of reality (experiment), FIRST checks his test-equipment to make sure it is calibrated accurately, so that the meters' are not misinforming him. If he doesn't bother to check, but assumes objectiveness, then he really doesn't want to know. It's the same with us... We need to understand and then check for objectivity in ourselves, first.  But, we do not see the need to check for this kind of baggage. Do we try to bias the input I receive?  Reality IS what it is.  In fact, one should be wary of any paradigm that needed to manipulate support for it, (though it still needs to be checked).

I would and have been very tempted to start a thread on 'Evolution and Intellegent Design', but I just do not have the time to follow through on it.... giving pros and cons for the propositions...in all categories.

And please understand that I'm not attacking you, in any way, for you are just as important as anyone else.  I'm just trying to point out the bias so evident within you, that few will face and deal with,... which I first found in myself years ago when I assumed the meters were naturally calibrated accurately... Until this coercionary baggage is removed from any person, it would be like Martin Luther King trying to reason with a Skinhead...the emotions will not allow for appropriate paradigm shifts....
 

[Resetti's Replicas]

I don't understand why people put their birth-year into their user name, especially  if they're in an age group that is generally seen as immature and ignorant.  I mean, how can you take seriously a username that shouts out "I'm an 11-year-old religious nut!!!"

[System32]

The first sentance shows you read this thread, the second shows you read it poorly.

Evolution is far from an indisputable fact, and has several issues.  But that's another topic; right now I'm talking about Epistemology...

None of them are saying that Christianity is flawed, only that they hate those who take religion to push their own agena, and those who promote the us vs them ideology. and half of the people here are Agnostic, AKA Not-Knowing.

This is just me assuming you are implying, as you are christian, and I have a slight us VS them mentality as well.

Also: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Z0LXNn2sxg&feature=related

He is a WINNAR.


And I don't think an evo V YEC V OEC V any other creation belief is a good idea...