RA2 Mafia - Splash

[Dark-Al]

So I wake up in the morning and this happens:
Mafia member Dreamcast dead, great three more to go.
Village member/ Cop Neon dead, now how are meant to know who's innocent and who's guilty. At least Badnik didn't add the Baker role or we'll be starving to death? 
Now I find out that Mr AS and Silverfish are being voted to be lynched without proper evidence. How do you personally know that anyone of those two are part of the mafia? Are you just bandwagoning on whoever just to get them lynched,or just for personal reasons like you don't like them!? But if the later option was the case, then some of us will be voting for Asbs or someone they don't like.
Personally I would NL (No lynch) still there's no evidence to prove anyone of the two are guilty or innocent. But the evidence we have is that RedAce is clear because the Mafia [Dreamcast] attacked him and failed.
But this is just a case of bandwagoning so I vote Silverfish even if I have to.

So you say you wanna abstain from a lynch, but then you say that you're voting to lynch Silverfish based on literally nothing? That's weird.

I don't really know what got into me. This what you get from a bandwagon, you think that I wouldn't vote based on no evidence. But an inner feeling basically wants me to follow the Bandwagon, even when there's no evidence against him. It's like if you went to a place based your friends wanted to go to, but even if you didn't want to go in the first place, your Friends insist you should go even when you have a choice, but you don't want to disappoint. Personally I can ignore the Bandwagon but everyone is just encouraging me to vote like Peer Pressure.
So I'm changing my vote since I made a fool out of myself. So I vote: no one.
Edit: Made my argument clearer.

[090901]

It has been, as our ancestors used to say, many moons since last I graced you with one of my glorious animadversions about Shield's snarky anecdotes. With this letter I intend to propitiate my regular readers with a look at Shield's desire to address what is, in the end, a nonexistent problem. It is first necessary, however, to make clear which facts are not in dispute. There is little dispute that Shield is apt to respond to this letter in the same emotional way that a devout Christian in the 15th century might have responded to someone who announced publicly that he didn't believe in the virgin birth. There is also hardly any dispute that if Shield's plan to rip off everyone and his brother is to be discouraged then the wisest course of action is to dole out acerbic criticism of Shield and his phalanx of unprincipled, reprehensible followers. Before we start down that road I ought to remind you that when a mistake is made, the smart thing to do is to admit it and reverse course. That takes real courage. The way that Shield stubbornly refuses to own up to his mistakes serves only to convince me that his ruling-class morality needs a working-class kick in the heinie. Be patient; I won't ask you to take that on faith. Rather, I'll provide irrefragable proof that Shield's claims are like the Hydra from Greek mythology. They continually acquire new heads and new strength. The only way to stunt their growth is to establish democracy and equality. The only way to destroy Shield's Hydra entirely is to provide more people with the knowledge that he once said that he is known for his sound judgment, unerring foresight, and sagacious adaptation of means to ends. His henchmen and others capable of little more than rote psittacism are now saying that too. In contrast, I say that Shield knows what he wants, and he knows how to get it. What he wants is to teach the next generation how to hate—and whom to hate. Making that happen involves advocating measures that others criticize for being excessively splenetic. While that tactic may prove successful, it is bookish. It also overlooks the fact that some of my acquaintances express the view that Shield's claim that the more strepitant the communication, the more perspicuous the message, is fact-free (although perhaps “ludicrous” would be the right word). Others express the view that Shield takes visible delight in sugarcoating the past and dispensing false optimism for the future. I am prepared to offer a cheer and a half for each view; together, they paint a sufficiently complete picture of Shield to warrant a full three cheers.

I can't follow Shield's pretzel logic. I do, however, know that many of the spiteful menaces I've encountered are convinced that it's illegal to educate, pressure, and change society as a whole—or, if it isn't illegal, then it ought to be. This view is tartarean by any stretch of the imagination and reflects how I've tried to explain to Shield's shameless peeps that Shield turns his back on those who have been the most loyal to him. As could be expected, they were a bit slow on the uptake. I just couldn't get them to comprehend that Shield has been trying hard to separate us off into various, antagonistic camps. I believe we should oppose that effort by helping others to see through the empty and meaningless statements uttered by him and his hirelings.

Aside from the fact that even children are not safe from Shield's clumsy, macabre half-measures, I have some of Shield's fustian editorials in front of me right now. In one of them, Shield alleges that he does the things he does “for the children”. If you don't find that shocking then consider that Shield maliciously defames and damagingly misrepresents everyone and everything around him. There's a word for that: libel. Implying that it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the chippy hands of incorrigible vocabularians is no different from implying that he is the way, the truth, and the light. Both statements are ludicrous. In closing, although this letter has been lengthy there are still a large number of comments about Shield that I have had to leave aside. I didn't even begin to mention, for instance, that Shield's expositions are a farraginous amalgam of antinomianism and parasitism. Anyway, the important point is that society as a whole should act as a unifying force to call a spade a spade.

This is why, to an outside observer such as myself, that Shield is indeed guilty of possessing a role such as "Serial Killer" or "Godfather". I would make the recommendation to the town of this game to lynch him as soon as possible and you have the last person to vote to be Mr Asshole as his bot (Ok, this is ABSOLUTE ****ing bullsh**. I went to see Cars in the theater yesterday, and when Lightning McQueen got HOT with Sally in Radiator Springs, my boner engaged. When Lightning McQueen said "Ka-Chow!", I couldn't help it!!! I closed my eyes, and I TORE my dick to shreds, using whip like motions and pulled with great force. That was one of the best nuts I ever had, just thinking about it now gets me riled up. Thing is, I nutted all over the kid sitting right next to me, and his mom got all pissed at me, screaming at me for jacking off on her son. I told that bitch to shut the **** up, and that jacking off is a natural, artistic, and beautiful process. You should BE HAPPY that my semen is all over your son, maybe he can learn a lesson or two about the culture and art of jacking off. HOWEVER, the movie theater managers didn't agree with me. They KICKED ME OUT of the movie theater, and I didn't even finish watching the Cars movie. Not only THAT, but they made me clean up my semen after it already dried out and solidified on the seats. THATS TORTURE!! Do you know how hard it is to clean semen after its dried out? You CLEAN semen after its FRESH out of your cock, not an hour after you ****ing nutted. This is a ****ing OUTRAGE. Do you really expect me to not whip out my cock and jack off when i see a HOT sex scene in a movie? Either don't ban sex scenes in movies, or LET ME jack off in your theater, assholes.) is the most fit to take down Shield's bot (Asc3nsion). I rest my case.

[Dark-Al]

It has been, as our ancestors used to say, many moons since last I graced you with one of my glorious animadversions about Shield's snarky anecdotes. With this letter I intend to propitiate my regular readers with a look at Shield's desire to address what is, in the end, a nonexistent problem. It is first necessary, however, to make clear which facts are not in dispute. There is little dispute that Shield is apt to respond to this letter in the same emotional way that a devout Christian in the 15th century might have responded to someone who announced publicly that he didn't believe in the virgin birth. There is also hardly any dispute that if Shield's plan to rip off everyone and his brother is to be discouraged then the wisest course of action is to dole out acerbic criticism of Shield and his phalanx of unprincipled, reprehensible followers. Before we start down that road I ought to remind you that when a mistake is made, the smart thing to do is to admit it and reverse course. That takes real courage. The way that Shield stubbornly refuses to own up to his mistakes serves only to convince me that his ruling-class morality needs a working-class kick in the heinie. Be patient; I won't ask you to take that on faith. Rather, I'll provide irrefragable proof that Shield's claims are like the Hydra from Greek mythology. They continually acquire new heads and new strength. The only way to stunt their growth is to establish democracy and equality. The only way to destroy Shield's Hydra entirely is to provide more people with the knowledge that he once said that he is known for his sound judgment, unerring foresight, and sagacious adaptation of means to ends. His henchmen and others capable of little more than rote psittacism are now saying that too. In contrast, I say that Shield knows what he wants, and he knows how to get it. What he wants is to teach the next generation how to hate—and whom to hate. Making that happen involves advocating measures that others criticize for being excessively splenetic. While that tactic may prove successful, it is bookish. It also overlooks the fact that some of my acquaintances express the view that Shield's claim that the more strepitant the communication, the more perspicuous the message, is fact-free (although perhaps “ludicrous” would be the right word). Others express the view that Shield takes visible delight in sugarcoating the past and dispensing false optimism for the future. I am prepared to offer a cheer and a half for each view; together, they paint a sufficiently complete picture of Shield to warrant a full three cheers.

I can't follow Shield's pretzel logic. I do, however, know that many of the spiteful menaces I've encountered are convinced that it's illegal to educate, pressure, and change society as a whole—or, if it isn't illegal, then it ought to be. This view is tartarean by any stretch of the imagination and reflects how I've tried to explain to Shield's shameless peeps that Shield turns his back on those who have been the most loyal to him. As could be expected, they were a bit slow on the uptake. I just couldn't get them to comprehend that Shield has been trying hard to separate us off into various, antagonistic camps. I believe we should oppose that effort by helping others to see through the empty and meaningless statements uttered by him and his hirelings.

Aside from the fact that even children are not safe from Shield's clumsy, macabre half-measures, I have some of Shield's fustian editorials in front of me right now. In one of them, Shield alleges that he does the things he does “for the children”. If you don't find that shocking then consider that Shield maliciously defames and damagingly misrepresents everyone and everything around him. There's a word for that: libel. Implying that it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the chippy hands of incorrigible vocabularians is no different from implying that he is the way, the truth, and the light. Both statements are ludicrous. In closing, although this letter has been lengthy there are still a large number of comments about Shield that I have had to leave aside. I didn't even begin to mention, for instance, that Shield's expositions are a farraginous amalgam of antinomianism and parasitism. Anyway, the important point is that society as a whole should act as a unifying force to call a spade a spade.

This is why, to an outside observer such as myself, that Shield is indeed guilty of possessing a role such as "Serial Killer" or "Godfather". I would make the recommendation to the town of this game to lynch him as soon as possible and you have the last person to vote to be Mr Asshole as his bot (Ok, this is ABSOLUTE ****ing bullsh**. I went to see Cars in the theater yesterday, and when Lightning McQueen got HOT with Sally in Radiator Springs, my boner engaged. When Lightning McQueen said "Ka-Chow!", I couldn't help it!!! I closed my eyes, and I TORE my dick to shreds, using whip like motions and pulled with great force. That was one of the best nuts I ever had, just thinking about it now gets me riled up. Thing is, I nutted all over the kid sitting right next to me, and his mom got all pissed at me, screaming at me for jacking off on her son. I told that bitch to shut the **** up, and that jacking off is a natural, artistic, and beautiful process. You should BE HAPPY that my semen is all over your son, maybe he can learn a lesson or two about the culture and art of jacking off. HOWEVER, the movie theater managers didn't agree with me. They KICKED ME OUT of the movie theater, and I didn't even finish watching the Cars movie. Not only THAT, but they made me clean up my semen after it already dried out and solidified on the seats. THATS TORTURE!! Do you know how hard it is to clean semen after its dried out? You CLEAN semen after its FRESH out of your cock, not an hour after you ****ing nutted. This is a ****ing OUTRAGE. Do you really expect me to not whip out my cock and jack off when i see a HOT sex scene in a movie? Either don't ban sex scenes in movies, or LET ME jack off in your theater, assholes.) is the most fit to take down Shield's bot (Asc3nsion). I rest my case.

It does seen suspicious about why Shield is calling out on Silverfish without any proper evidence, unless Shield is the Serial Killer, Mafia or has the evidence to call out upon Silverfish like if Shield was the lookout.
Apart from the top-notch S*** posting, you don't have the evidence to call out Shield for this since you're not playing. But this does help to look on Shield with suspicion.

[Shield]

Aside from the fact that even children are not safe from Shield's clumsy, macabre half-measures, I have some of Shield's fustian editorials in front of me right now. In one of them, Shield alleges that he does the things he does “for the children”.

It does seen suspicious about why Shield is calling out on Silverfish without any proper evidence, unless Shield is the Serial Killer, Mafia or has the evidence to call out upon Silverfish like if Shield was the lookout.
Apart from the top-notch S*** posting, you don't have the evidence to call out Shield for this since you're not playing. But this does help to look on Shield with suspicion.

its true i do a lot of things for children

[Thrackerzod]

By the way, as of now I'm not gonna vote to killify anyone today.  Not enough evidence.

[Avalanche]

Dark's got a point in that paragraph of text: we haven't got a clue who is evil.

Now, who said Silverfish should be lynched originally? Mechadino.

I'm voting mechadino as a result.

Suspicion on Dark Al to see the bandwagoning and follow through with it (edit: until he got called out and "no vote"'d, i legit missed that in his ****ing manifesto of a post because tl;dr) - i'm guessing he's a mafia or third party who's pulling a bamboozle, but this isn't reason to lynch him just yet.

Vote Mechadino.

[Mr. AS]

Mafia member Dreamcast dead, great three more to go.

How would you know how many mafia members there are? Seems suspect to me.

[Badger]

Mafia member Dreamcast dead, great three more to go.

How would you know how many mafia members there are? Seems suspect to me.

lol

Lynch dark-al.

[Badnik96]

oh right i forgot to mention this earlier but to make the numbers a little more even i added a second goon, so there's 5 total mafia

[Avalanche]

Mafia member Dreamcast dead, great three more to go.

How would you know how many mafia members there are? Seems suspect to me.

lol

Lynch dark-al.

I agree.
Changing my vote to Dark-Al. Somebody with a good robot mind voting this guy?

Badnik, mind going through the rules and seeing if theres anything else you missed out/we haven't read?

[Mecha]

Somebody with a good robot mind voting this guy?

idk if my robot is any good (hardly tested it)
but I'll vote him anyway
changing vote from silverfish to dark-al

[doot]

>badnik mentions 5 mafia
>Dark-AL mentions there is 3 to go

i don't get it

[Dark-Al]

>badnik mentions 5 mafia
>Dark-AL mentions there is 3 to go

i don't get it

Opps, sorry there four more Mafia members to go DOOT. At first I thought there was four but I forgot there was five in the first place.
Edit:

Mafia member Dreamcast dead, great three more to go.

How would you know how many mafia members there are? Seems suspect to me.

lol

Lynch dark-al.

I agree.
Changing my vote to Dark-Al. Somebody with a good robot mind voting this guy?

Badnik, mind going through the rules and seeing if theres anything else you missed out/we haven't read?

You do realize that just because someone knows how many mafia memebers are left, is all mentioned in the fourm and the rules. Badnik said there was Five mafia members in the rules and yet one [Dreamcast] is dead, that make four members left. Just because I know how many members are left is due to common sense, not being part of the mafia.
Because Badger reacted quickly to this common error, I think he's desperate to scape-goat the blame onto someone just so he can get away and kill someone the next night.   

oh right i forgot to mention this earlier but to make the numbers a little more even i added a second goon, so there's 5 total mafia

So as I stated, there should be four left. If working from each game of mafia: In the 24 game, there is one of each power member in the mafia and in most games, there will be multiple under-powered members, so that makes five. I may be stating the oveus but how the game is formed and you should know that if you played multiple games of Mafia! 

[Meganerdbomb]

I've played enough Town of Salem to know where this is going, so sure, let's lynch Dark-Al. 

[Dark-Al]

I've played enough Town of Salem to know where this is going, so sure, let's lynch Dark-Al. 

Alright, I had enough! The jig is up, you finally found me. You might as well just lynch me over a failure to defend myself over one simple error. But let me tell you something, sometimes I got though multiple Mafia games by pure luck. Sometimes that I get a role that no one expects me to be like being a ninja on Epic Mafia, I could be someone with a gun or I'm just the person who keeps my mouth shut and perfectly slips under the radar half the time.
I who lie about someone being mafia but, there's no point. So just lynch me, you'll never expect the last lot but just expect someone who's trying to pass the blame.

[Avalanche]

I've played enough Town of Salem to know where this is going, so sure, let's lynch Dark-Al. 

Alright, I had enough! The jig is up, you finally found me. You might as well just lynch me over a failure to defend myself over one simple error. But let me tell you something, sometimes I got though multiple Mafia games by pure luck. Sometimes that I get a role that no one expects me to be like being a ninja on Epic Mafia, I could be someone with a gun or I'm just the person who keeps my mouth shut and perfectly slips under the radar half the time.
I who lie about someone being mafia but, there's no point. So just lynch me, you'll never expect the last lot but just expect someone who's trying to pass the blame.

that's one hell of a jester play right there

im presuming he's a real jester trying to make a bad jester "you found me gg lynch me now" play

so abstaining my lynch

[Badger]

I've played enough Town of Salem to know where this is going, so sure, let's lynch Dark-Al. 

Alright, I had enough! The jig is up, you finally found me. You might as well just lynch me over a failure to defend myself over one simple error. But let me tell you something, sometimes I got though multiple Mafia games by pure luck. Sometimes that I get a role that no one expects me to be like being a ninja on Epic Mafia, I could be someone with a gun or I'm just the person who keeps my mouth shut and perfectly slips under the radar half the time.
I who lie about someone being mafia but, there's no point. So just lynch me, you'll never expect the last lot but just expect someone who's trying to pass the blame.

What

No matter if you're mafia or town, getting yourself killed is bad for your team. So asking to be killed is going against the "you must only play for your team" rule surely, as you're playing so as to favour the other team. The only exception to this would be if Dark-Al is the jester.


So no vote for me (with all these random-ass roles this is more like town of salem than mafia)

[Avalanche]

yeah dark is a sh**ty jester, (or he's a mafia/third party that just got caught, and now he's using our belief that he's a jester to **** with us, or he's a gamethrowing town) moving on:

mechadino called out silver for literally no reason

Lynch him.

[RedAce]

I vote Silverfish.

Also I wasn't expecting to get out of that alive, y'know.  Popups and all.  GG dude.

[Mecha]

mechadino called out silver for literally no reason

Lynch him.

Yea, because this post isn't suspicious at all:

I'm probably supposed to shut my jaw now, since I'm dead. Boss, burry me with my Cello.

k
Just glad I'm not the one getting the votes...

changing vote back to silverfish