Author Topic: CombatAnts 2 Awards  (Read 2860 times)

Offline Naryar

  • Posts: 23267
  • Rep: 20
  • hybrids oui oui
    • http://www.youtube.com/us
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Skype: TheMightyNaryar
Re: CombatAnts 2 Awards
« Reply #20 on: May 10, 2010, 08:25:51 AM »
:gawe: wooo the GHEY AND UNEFFICIENT (yet very smart?) CRAWLER won something.

Fixed ! Muhahahahaha !

Offline JoeBlo

Re: CombatAnts 2 Awards
« Reply #21 on: May 10, 2010, 08:39:23 AM »
Ghey - doesnt use "cheap" tactics like the standard crawler.. it relies on robots ramming into it.. which is there own fault.

Inefficient - it also beat 2 DSL AI robots in a 2 on 1 match, so its not all that bad..

Crawler - it takes steps (well it should have) making it a walker.

Game, Set, Match ?

Offline Naryar

  • Posts: 23267
  • Rep: 20
  • hybrids oui oui
    • http://www.youtube.com/us
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Skype: TheMightyNaryar
Re: CombatAnts 2 Awards
« Reply #22 on: May 10, 2010, 09:04:01 AM »
it relies on robots ramming into it.. which is there own fault.

Exactly like crawlers.

Inefficient - it also beat 2 DSL AI robots in a 2 on 1 match, so its not all that bad..

What, Terminus ? Nanowhirl that broke it's weapon on the weapons ? Faily Poly ? Flip Test Dummy ? One of my fail antweights ?

Crawler - it takes steps (well it should have) making it a walker.

Crawlers use weapons on extenders touching the ground for drive... Technically a crawler. An original one, but a crawler. And crawlers do take steps as well !

Offline JoeBlo

Re: CombatAnts 2 Awards
« Reply #23 on: May 10, 2010, 09:50:00 AM »
an SnS rely's on a robot ramming into it also ?

yes the Anthrobotics team were all beaten.. Terminus and True Love were both 2 on 1 matches.

crawlers use weapons as a substitute for wheels as locomotion.. this uses 2 legs and steps forward

also why do you insult anything? honestly its getting old fast.... do you need to prove something to yourself by calling everything ghey  :ermm:

Offline Thyrus

  • *
  • Posts: 6210
  • Rep: 19
  • Back to purple '17
    • http://www.youtube.com/Th
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: CombatAnts 2 Awards
« Reply #24 on: May 10, 2010, 09:55:32 AM »
I guess so.

Naryar`s a little Beefboy ;)

Offline Naryar

  • Posts: 23267
  • Rep: 20
  • hybrids oui oui
    • http://www.youtube.com/us
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Skype: TheMightyNaryar
Re: CombatAnts 2 Awards
« Reply #25 on: May 11, 2010, 03:47:26 AM »
Just really did it for the lulz. It's not even gay in my books anyway... but i still stand on my claim of it being inefficient :P

It's a cool design though, i should try it one day.

Offline JoeBlo

Re: CombatAnts 2 Awards
« Reply #26 on: May 11, 2010, 03:51:04 AM »
I thought the homophobia was to prove your manhood :P

its not efficient since it uses weight for movement (rather then as part of a weapon like rammers or sns's) but still fairly good in the AW class

if Jonzu had tested the AI prior to filming and notified me that is wasnt performing the way it did in my video then it would have had a better chance. 

Offline Naryar

  • Posts: 23267
  • Rep: 20
  • hybrids oui oui
    • http://www.youtube.com/us
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Skype: TheMightyNaryar
Re: CombatAnts 2 Awards
« Reply #27 on: May 11, 2010, 03:54:59 AM »
I thought the homophobia was to prove your manhood :P

No, for some unknown reason of mine i seem to have taken that whole gay thing from Inf.

if Jonzu had tested the AI prior to filming and notified me that is wasnt performing the way it did in my video then it would have had a better chance. 

Quite a similar case for me :P