gametechmods

Robot Arena Matches => Tournaments => Tournament Archives => Topic started by: WeN on November 22, 2016, 03:14:22 AM

Title: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion [Inactive]
Post by: WeN on November 22, 2016, 03:14:22 AM

(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/76310BATTLEWENS.png)
(Logo and Name WIP)
New Tournament by me with IRL

DSL 2.2 IRL
Middleweight
16 Entry
This time I can ai but I would recommend you to ai yourself
If this is DSL IRL, The IRL Skin pack by DSC is allowed.
BFE, and in gane glitch is ALLOWed
Must had a least 2 Wheel drive and all wheel drive mist have/show controlled movement, entering 1 wheel drive make me wanna to
Clusters, crawlers, scuttles, drones, etc is banned
SnS banned too
Upgrade your robot is allowed until the end of deadline or full entry in tournament.
CF is allowed.
No weapon motor for drive.

All Robot start with 3 lives, if you lose, you lose your lives, if you win, you steal robot's live.
Boss battle happen in some round, if you lose boss battle, I steal all of your live, if you win boss battle, I give you live.

TBA

If you had zero live, you eliminated.
If you win the tournament, you must battle a boss battle before gaining your prize, if you lose, you get uncommon prize, if you win, you get rare prize.
If there is two bot left, I will put them in grand finals, if you lose grand finals, you lose, if you win, you will put into final boss battle.

Robot Wars Arena with hazard on
BO1
Haovk will make the match keep going

My Entry:

Coming Soon

Had I missed everything?

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic - Discussion
Post by: Avalanche on November 22, 2016, 06:41:00 AM

By "Legal but i allow it" does that mean you will judge if the use of CF or BFE is fair or not and reject the bot if you so choose?

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic - Discussion
Post by: WeN on November 22, 2016, 07:02:37 AM

Quote from: Avalanche on November 22, 2016, 06:41:00 AM

By "Legal but i allow it" does that mean you will judge if the use of CF or BFE is fair or not and reject the bot if you so choose?

You can use CF twice for HeavyDerby
You can use BFE to edit Chassis Height.
I am not very smart

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: Jammy Dodger on November 22, 2016, 09:30:38 AM

I'm going to enter this awesome sounding tournament with HIT MEH

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: Badger on November 22, 2016, 09:48:55 AM

Wen please don't do IRL, you're too pure.

And don't allow swiss army bots, it takes too long between rounds and doesn't allow you to pre-record.

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: 090901 on November 22, 2016, 12:01:15 PM

buy a gun and do IRL Wen

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: WeN on November 23, 2016, 02:11:00 AM

Quote from: Badger on November 22, 2016, 09:48:55 AM

Wen please don't do IRL, you're too pure.

Quote from: WenXiangLee on November 22, 2016, 03:14:22 AM

DSL 2.2 DSL-S

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: Avalanche on November 23, 2016, 02:12:43 AM

Not going to enter due to dsl-s. Stand up for what you chose originally wen, if they want a dsl-s tournament they can run it themselves.

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: WeN on November 23, 2016, 02:17:41 AM

Quote from: Avalanche on November 23, 2016, 02:12:43 AM

Not going to enter due to dsl-s. Stand up for what you chose originally wen, if they want a dsl-s tournament they can run it themselves.

Quote from: WenXiangLee on November 22, 2016, 07:02:37 AM

DSL 2.2 IRL

I just accidently changed the rules.
thx a lot

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: Badger on November 23, 2016, 02:31:19 AM

Quote from: WenXiangLee on November 23, 2016, 02:17:41 AM

Quote from: Avalanche on November 23, 2016, 02:12:43 AM

Not going to enter due to dsl-s. Stand up for what you chose originally wen, if they want a dsl-s tournament they can run it themselves.

Quote from: WenXiangLee on November 22, 2016, 07:02:37 AM

DSL 2.2 IRL

I just accidently changed the rules.
thx a lot

You shouldn't listen to Avalanche about anything to do with RA2. Do dsl-s, Wen.

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: doot on November 23, 2016, 02:39:53 AM

So a ruleset was changed because it wasn't 'muh meta'. Why am i not surprised?

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: 090901 on November 23, 2016, 03:00:39 AM

Quote from: 090901 on November 22, 2016, 12:01:15 PM

buy a gun and do IRL Wen

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: Badger on November 23, 2016, 03:14:00 AM

Quote from: DemonOfTomorrow on November 23, 2016, 02:39:53 AM

So a ruleset was changed because it wasn't 'muh meta'. Why am i not surprised?

hey guys if i say "muh meta" enough it means i'm right, right?

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: WeN on November 23, 2016, 04:00:47 AM

So I set up a poll and see what metagame to do you like to see this, so I won't ruining my rules.

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: Avalanche on November 23, 2016, 04:20:20 AM

Quote from: Badger on November 23, 2016, 03:14:00 AM

Quote from: DemonOfTomorrow on November 23, 2016, 02:39:53 AM

So a ruleset was changed because it wasn't 'muh meta'. Why am i not surprised?

hey guys if i say "muh meta" enough it means i'm right, right?

"hey guys if i act like a asshat and try to block anyone who wants to play IRL it means dsl-s is better/superior/i have the biggest e-peen/i'm right."

Take your pick, because all potential paths of logic point towards you trying to block us from playing the meta we want for no decent reason. If you want DSL-S, run a tournament for DSL-S. That's just common sense. Stop hijacking people's tournaments when they want them to be IRL. You just need to back off from the IRL Community, and we can back off from DSL-S and we can all get along. Now please leave this thread alone and let us enjoy our IRL tournament.
Your anti-IRL warpath is pointless and irritating, please just leave.

Quote from: WenXiangLee on November 23, 2016, 04:00:47 AM

So I set up a poll and see what metagame to do you like to see this, so I won't ruining my rules.

Good idea. Voted DSL-IRL.

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: Badger on November 23, 2016, 04:25:27 AM

Quote from: Badger on November 23, 2016, 02:31:19 AM

You shouldn't listen to Avalanche about anything to do with RA2.

Didn't bother to read your wall of text.

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: yugitom on November 23, 2016, 05:55:21 AM

You guys are seriously getting on my nerves with this. I swear I've warned you guys about this before. If it turns out I have, I'm just gonna dish out warnings because this 'debate' hasn't gone any further than pointless arguments and slight flaming. If this is the first verbal warning, then you've obviously been warned, now. The warnings I will start handing out after this incident will carry a lot more weight.

To Badger (or anyone who does not like IRL), I absolutely understand your qualms with the abundance of tournaments which don't fit your fancy and I know that it may be frustrating if you want to enter some more tournaments. It seems you have taken Craaig's advice in a different thread and you've started your own tournament, which is definitely the best approach. Just try not discourage anyone from doing what they would like to do by saying "not IRL again" or insinuating that IRL building is for those that cannot actually build or anything along those lines.

To Avalanche, I also understand your staunch support for DSL-IRL and I also understand why you are so passionate about defending it. However, please do not continue to make the DSL-S vs DSL-IRL thing a problem by getting into arguments with Badger.

To DoT, stop saying 'muh meta'.

To everyone else, do not attempt to make people try to do things simply because you are not a fan of what they are proposing. It's absolutely fine to express your disappointment in a post like Mechadino does all the time in a thread that isn't stock but this

Quote from: Badger on November 22, 2016, 09:48:55 AM

Wen please don't do IRL, you're too pure.

is not an appropriate response.

There will start to be warnings being handed out if this continues because it never leads to useful debate and will result in a much larger flame war, at some point, and I don't want to go down that path. Let this be the end of it, let bygones be bygones and simply stay out of business that you don't want to concern yourself with.

Sorry, Wen. Good luck with the rest of your tournament discussion :)

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: WeN on November 23, 2016, 06:49:32 AM

Ok, so... DSL IRL will be metagame for BattleWens.
remember

EDIT:some little bit rule change

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: Jammy Dodger on November 27, 2016, 03:18:26 PM

I really want this in signups so I can enter :smile: :smile:

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: WeN on December 01, 2016, 10:27:56 PM

Some rules changed a little bit.

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: Jammy Dodger on December 06, 2016, 02:45:42 PM

Why is this place dead it shouldn't be as its a great sounding tourney

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: 09090901 on December 06, 2016, 02:46:41 PM

probably because it isn't in signups and the host hasn't put the poll up

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: Jammy Dodger on December 06, 2016, 02:47:22 PM

Quote from: Geice on December 06, 2016, 02:46:41 PM

probably because it isn't in signups and the host hasn't put the poll up

Oh thats sad : (

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: WeN on December 07, 2016, 10:08:08 PM

Quote from: Jamied666 on December 06, 2016, 02:45:42 PM

Why is this place dead it shouldn't be as its a great sounding tourney

becuase I didn't put up poll?

Gimmick rule changed, go read them.
I think I am going to put up poll if I completed my entry.

Title: Re: BattleWens:Rerun of WenXiangTatic (WIP) - Discussion
Post by: Jammy Dodger on December 08, 2016, 01:42:15 AM

Quote from: WenXiangLee on December 07, 2016, 10:08:08 PM

Quote from: Jamied666 on December 06, 2016, 02:45:42 PM

Why is this place dead it shouldn't be as its a great sounding tourney

becuase I didn't put up poll?

Gimmick rule changed, go read them.

Yay, the new gimmick rule is weird but I can forgive it because BATTLEWENS

Text Only | Text with Attachments