Author Topic: Sage and Infinite's Robot Design Challenges  (Read 10010 times)

Offline Naryar

  • Posts: 23267
  • Rep: 20
  • hybrids oui oui
    • http://www.youtube.com/us
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Skype: TheMightyNaryar
Sage and Infinite's Robot Design Challenges
« Reply #20 on: May 18, 2008, 06:47:38 PM »
Two purple batteries are way enough for 2 RADs.

Two pinks: imput +200
2 Rads: imput -160

One nifty: +400

Got this from Clickbeetle's site. But actually the nifty weights the same as 2 pinks, so...

Offline Venko

Sage and Infinite's Robot Design Challenges
« Reply #21 on: May 18, 2008, 07:03:31 PM »
YEA... This that Naryar say its true so...

Offline infiniteinertia

  • *
  • Posts: 1853
  • Rep: 6
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Sage and Infinite's Robot Design Challenges
« Reply #22 on: May 18, 2008, 07:45:04 PM »
go a 3 minute match with just rads and two pinks and you tell me what you think
#MakeStockGreatAgain


#BANtheHS The Movement

Offline Sorrow

  • *
  • Posts: 180
  • Rep: 0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Sage and Infinite's Robot Design Challenges
« Reply #23 on: May 18, 2008, 07:49:42 PM »
Weirdly enough, I once powered a 4 hp ztek spinner with two pinks. It had Rad drive.
I still don't know how the heck that worked.
Honors:
BBEANS 3: Semifinalist
BBEANS 4: Quarterfinalist
Tag Team Championship: Co-Champion.

Offline Clickbeetle

  • *
  • Posts: 3374
  • Rep: 21
  • In Soviet Russia, bugs stomp YOU!
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Beetle Bros site
    • Awards
Sage and Infinite's Robot Design Challenges
« Reply #24 on: May 18, 2008, 08:19:30 PM »
Quote from: Naryar;8205
Two purple batteries are way enough for 2 RADs.

Two pinks: imput +200
2 Rads: imput -160

One nifty: +400

Got this from Clickbeetle's site. But actually the nifty weights the same as 2 pinks, so...


Yeah, but you also gotta take into account the total power.  Small battery packs have 7000 total electricity, and Nifties have 24000.  Two SBPs have 14000 total, so they last just a little more than half as long as a Nifty.  It's pretty much the bare minimum for a LW--it works fine, but after 3 minutes you'll be visibly slowing down.

That said, I think inf's bot is nicer.  They're both great, but the fact that inf's weapons are more protected behind the casters while retracted and he has the more efficient space utilization makes it a little bit better I think.

To lack feeling is to be dead, but to act on every feeling is to be a child.
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings

Offline Cooker

  • Antweight
  • Posts: 104
  • Rep: 0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Sage and Infinite's Robot Design Challenges
« Reply #25 on: May 19, 2008, 12:40:11 AM »
Quote from: Sorrow;8214
Weirdly enough, I once powered a 4 hp ztek spinner with two pinks. It had Rad drive.
I still don't know how the heck that worked.


Magic?

Offline Cooker

  • Antweight
  • Posts: 104
  • Rep: 0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Sage and Infinite's Robot Design Challenges
« Reply #26 on: May 19, 2008, 04:56:06 AM »
IMAO Sage gave away the possibility to win this round, because with a little bit moving the pinks forward and forming the back of the chassis just around the airtank, he would be able to put more weapons.  II's bot is more compact, so he was able to use one component more, than Sage and still having the same number of weapons plus a bigger battery.
So I vote for Infinite's bot.

Offline Naryar

  • Posts: 23267
  • Rep: 20
  • hybrids oui oui
    • http://www.youtube.com/us
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Skype: TheMightyNaryar
Sage and Infinite's Robot Design Challenges
« Reply #27 on: May 19, 2008, 05:26:20 AM »
Well I didnt thinked of the total power. You guys have a point...

I was talking of that too, protected weapons. Did you stacked air tanks Inf? Because in 2 minutes of forced poking the air is depleted with your spear risking being inside and weapon harmless.. But it is nethertheless two very good designs.

Offline Venko

Sage and Infinite's Robot Design Challenges
« Reply #28 on: May 19, 2008, 05:46:40 AM »
"The more is, the more is"
Winnie-the-Pooh

Offline infiniteinertia

  • *
  • Posts: 1853
  • Rep: 6
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Sage and Infinite's Robot Design Challenges
« Reply #29 on: May 19, 2008, 07:28:08 AM »
even if sage moved his battery forwards, hed have to use more chassis points.

i think another challenge me and sage did was 2 MW DSL F.B.S. each, i'll get those up later.
#MakeStockGreatAgain


#BANtheHS The Movement

Offline Sage

  • *
  • Posts: 6179
  • Rep: 11
  • RA2 Wizard & GTM's Favorite Stock Builder 2015
  • Awards Sage's Favorite BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Sage and Infinite's Robot Design Challenges
« Reply #30 on: June 02, 2008, 09:42:14 PM »
so we didnt post the MW DSL FBS yet, but we have this HW VS we made. check it out. (already posted in my showcase)
You got my vote for RA2 Wizard. Always and forever.

Offline infiniteinertia

  • *
  • Posts: 1853
  • Rep: 6
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Sage and Infinite's Robot Design Challenges
« Reply #31 on: June 02, 2008, 09:47:58 PM »
and mineeee
 
#MakeStockGreatAgain


#BANtheHS The Movement

Offline GameKing3

  • Heavyweight
  • Posts: 488
  • Rep: 0
  • A guy playing a guy disguised as another guy...
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • See profile for gamer tags: Yes
Sage and Infinite's Robot Design Challenges
« Reply #32 on: June 02, 2008, 10:05:57 PM »
I vote Infin's bot because it seems it would be more effective and looks like it took alot of time.

Offline Sage

  • *
  • Posts: 6179
  • Rep: 11
  • RA2 Wizard & GTM's Favorite Stock Builder 2015
  • Awards Sage's Favorite BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Sage and Infinite's Robot Design Challenges
« Reply #33 on: June 02, 2008, 10:43:35 PM »
remember people, his is only 2wd, if you cant see.
You got my vote for RA2 Wizard. Always and forever.

Offline infiniteinertia

  • *
  • Posts: 1853
  • Rep: 6
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Sage and Infinite's Robot Design Challenges
« Reply #34 on: June 02, 2008, 10:51:07 PM »
since when does 4wd on a VS mean better?
#MakeStockGreatAgain


#BANtheHS The Movement

Offline R0B0SH4RK

  • *
  • Posts: 1807
  • Rep: 8
  • There is epic to my madness.
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Sage and Infinite's Robot Design Challenges
« Reply #35 on: June 03, 2008, 12:08:45 AM »
Methinks sage's might be slightly better, but Inf's rips the crap out of it in looks. Win Infiniteinertia.

Offline Naryar

  • Posts: 23267
  • Rep: 20
  • hybrids oui oui
    • http://www.youtube.com/us
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Skype: TheMightyNaryar
Sage and Infinite's Robot Design Challenges
« Reply #36 on: June 03, 2008, 01:55:03 AM »
Inf has a point. VS aren't supposed to be very fast. My MW VS with bursted HPZtek drive knows this...

Offline Sage

  • *
  • Posts: 6179
  • Rep: 11
  • RA2 Wizard & GTM's Favorite Stock Builder 2015
  • Awards Sage's Favorite BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Sage and Infinite's Robot Design Challenges
« Reply #37 on: June 03, 2008, 06:34:16 PM »
i never meant to say 4wd is better, but you cant really see from those pics. didnt want you thinking his was 4wd too.
i vote for inf here too, just fyi.
You got my vote for RA2 Wizard. Always and forever.

Offline kill343gs

Sage and Infinite's Robot Design Challenges
« Reply #38 on: June 03, 2008, 08:06:41 PM »
Inf's. Looks better protected, better built, and more stable.


For once the mods did something right
#MakeGTMGreatAgain

Offline Cooker

  • Antweight
  • Posts: 104
  • Rep: 0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Sage and Infinite's Robot Design Challenges
« Reply #39 on: June 04, 2008, 07:19:24 AM »
I think this round goes to Infinite. However I like the extender works of Sage too.