Author Topic: RpJk's Stock Showcase: "Bring out your dead and unfinished design." (Read 105500 times)

090901 · « **Reply #500 on:** July 25, 2011, 01:02:49 PM »

I bet you got the idea from one of click's bots to put the arms like that :P

RpJk · « **Reply #501 on:** July 25, 2011, 03:15:29 PM »

Here it is now. How is it but I want to make a hybrid so what should I do with the remaning weight?

Skiitzzox220 · « **Reply #502 on:** July 25, 2011, 03:22:58 PM »

I personally think it would be better as a non hybrid because to get a decent VS in there you'd need to reduce the effectiveness of the side hammers

NFX · « **Reply #503 on:** July 25, 2011, 03:26:07 PM »

It might work well with a wamming rack. It'd stop opponents going up and over, and keep them within range of the side hammers, while causing damage at the same time.

RpJk · « **Reply #504 on:** July 25, 2011, 03:32:46 PM »

Quote from: NFX on July 25, 2011, 03:26:07 PM

It might work well with a wamming rack. It'd stop opponents going up and over, and keep them within range of the side hammers, while causing damage at the same time.

Yeah I could do that but that would make it basically a clone of Clicks Side Hammer?

NFX · « **Reply #505 on:** July 25, 2011, 03:34:50 PM »

I don't think so. I also think the ramplates would do a lot better if they were on the front instead of concealed behind the arms.

RpJk · « **Reply #506 on:** July 25, 2011, 03:40:30 PM »

Quote from: NFX on July 25, 2011, 03:34:50 PM

I don't think so. I also think the ramplates would do a lot better if they were on the front instead of concealed behind the arms.

It is mostly to deflect HS's but I think I keep it like that. So do you think I should angle the Wammer Rack so that it traps them?

NFX · « **Reply #507 on:** July 25, 2011, 03:54:28 PM »

Yeah. So it keeps the opponent in the damage range of the side hammers.

RpJk · « **Reply #508 on:** July 25, 2011, 04:24:35 PM »

Any Better?

090901 · « **Reply #509 on:** July 25, 2011, 05:22:25 PM »

move the arms back more.
get rid of the ramplates and add more razors.
~~and you need 2 blacks to power this.~~

Virus Bomb · « **Reply #510 on:** July 25, 2011, 05:49:10 PM »

he has 2 blacks.

090901 · « **Reply #511 on:** July 25, 2011, 05:51:37 PM »

Quote from: Virus Bomb on July 25, 2011, 05:49:10 PM

he has 2 blacks.

derp, i didn't see them stacked.

RpJk · « **Reply #512 on:** July 26, 2011, 02:30:07 AM »

Can't I just take away the Ramplates and use Caster Armour instead?

090901 · « **Reply #513 on:** July 26, 2011, 05:35:58 AM »

It's useless to have ramplates back there.

RpJk · « **Reply #514 on:** July 28, 2011, 10:55:20 AM »

Possible Ironbot entry but need help.

NFX · « **Reply #515 on:** July 28, 2011, 11:00:20 AM »

Axle mounts are a bad move. Wasted weight, and they screw up the balance with the stuff swinging around. Swap them for BA's, lose the pinks, shrink the chassis a little bit, and try to add more weaponry. Maybe use RAD's instead of HPZ's for the weaponry.

090901 · « **Reply #516 on:** July 28, 2011, 01:08:37 PM »

You need as many weapons as possible, so 16 irons isn't going to work.

RpJk · « **Reply #517 on:** July 29, 2011, 01:31:20 PM »

Ok Tried to add Snapper II's in the middle but won't fit so I went for Servos but it havoks when you put the Z-teks in the middle and I also have weight left over.Any help?

ty4er · « **Reply #518 on:** July 29, 2011, 01:37:55 PM »

eFFe some more maces on

Not sure what to do with anything else as i hardly play stock :P

DuckRA2 · « **Reply #519 on:** July 29, 2011, 01:39:02 PM »

Cross stack 2 black bats if there is only one there. You do not need the servos probably, I would use the anchor mount instead, and then just spin the motors to access the tribar attachment points that appear inside other components.