« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Weights  (Read 1822 times)

Offline Shield

  • The question isn't who will let me.
  • Ultra Heavyweight
  • Posts: 2196
  • Rep: 8
  • It's who will stop me.
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Weights
« on: February 16, 2014, 07:17:44 AM »
So, um, is there anyway for a member to stay in just one weight? Like, let's say a member wants to stay at "heavyweight", but he's/she's quickly approaching the "superheavyweight" status, is it possible for him to stay at "heavyweight" despite passing the amount of posts needed to be a "superheavyweight"?
Logged
beep beep

Offline cephalopod

Re: Weights
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2014, 11:28:01 AM »
Not really without Trov making another usergroup I imagine - why would you want to anyway?
Logged
bristol bot builders / two headed death flamingo / snappy robots
//
kindest and friendliest '13, '15, '16, '17 / favourite staff member '14, '15

Offline Naryar

  • Posts: 23283
  • Rep: 21
  • hybrids oui oui
    • http://www.youtube.com/us
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Skype: TheMightyNaryar
Re: Weights
« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2014, 01:47:01 PM »
...Do you really care about weightclass titles ?
Logged

Offline Sage

  • *
  • Posts: 6182
  • Rep: 11
  • RA2 Wizard & GTM's Favorite Stock Builder 2015
  • Awards Sage's Favorite BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Weights
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2014, 04:52:12 PM »
On a side note, it would be cool if the weights lined up with the game weights exactly.

HW 800 posts, SHW 1200 posts, and then add UHW 5000 posts.
Logged
Quote from: Meganerdbomb on January 03, 2017, 11:01:50 AM
You got my vote for RA2 Wizard. Always and forever.

Offline KOS

  • Heavyweight
  • Posts: 578
  • Rep: 8
    • NoxoraGTR
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • See profile for gamer tags: Yes
  • Skype: george.boenke
Re: Weights
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2014, 04:59:40 PM »
That would be cool, but just to be a lightweight you would need 249 :L
Logged

Offline Trovaner

  • *
  • Posts: 1222
  • Rep: 32
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Weights
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2014, 05:32:18 PM »
Actually, it would take 176 posts just to be listed as a LW if we followed the exact scheme that RA2 uses. Anyways, I changed it and added the two missing member groups.

Edit: I also added the weightless member group for members over 5000 (since they are no longer UHW).
Logged

Offline rnifnuf

  • Forum Linguist
  • Heavyweight
  • Posts: 434
  • Rep: 5
  • Proponent of competitive sonnet improvisation
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • See profile for gamer tags: Yes
Re: Weights
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2014, 07:12:59 PM »
I was thinking that you could replace "Weightless" with "Giga Heavyweight", since a GHW weighs over 5000kg.
Logged
Follow me on Twitter? I'd like to see you try!

Stock Showcase     DSL Showcase     Ironforge Showcase

Offline Shield

  • The question isn't who will let me.
  • Ultra Heavyweight
  • Posts: 2196
  • Rep: 8
  • It's who will stop me.
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Weights
« Reply #7 on: February 17, 2014, 01:51:59 AM »
Quote from: Craaig on February 16, 2014, 11:28:01 AM
Not really without Trov making another usergroup I imagine - why would you want to anyway?

Super heavyweights are mainstream. Always did like Heavyweights anyways. Plus, favorite weight class in MMA.

Quote from: Naryar on February 16, 2014, 01:47:01 PM
...Do you really care about weightclass titles ?

Naw. Just curious.
Logged
beep beep
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »