Posted by: Shield« on: February 17, 2014, 01:51:59 AM »Not really without Trov making another usergroup I imagine - why would you want to anyway? Super heavyweights are mainstream. Always did like Heavyweights anyways. Plus, favorite weight class in MMA. ...Do you really care about weightclass titles ? Naw. Just curious. Posted by: rnifnuf« on: February 16, 2014, 07:12:59 PM »I was thinking that you could replace "Weightless" with "Giga Heavyweight", since a GHW weighs over 5000kg.
Posted by: Trovaner« on: February 16, 2014, 05:32:18 PM »Actually, it would take 176 posts just to be listed as a LW if we followed the exact scheme that RA2 uses. Anyways, I changed it and added the two missing member groups.
Edit: I also added the weightless member group for members over 5000 (since they are no longer UHW). Posted by: KOS« on: February 16, 2014, 04:59:40 PM »That would be cool, but just to be a lightweight you would need 249 :L
Posted by: Sage« on: February 16, 2014, 04:52:12 PM »On a side note, it would be cool if the weights lined up with the game weights exactly.
HW 800 posts, SHW 1200 posts, and then add UHW 5000 posts. Posted by: Naryar« on: February 16, 2014, 01:47:01 PM »...Do you really care about weightclass titles ?
Posted by: cephalopod« on: February 16, 2014, 11:28:01 AM »Not really without Trov making another usergroup I imagine - why would you want to anyway?
Posted by: Shield« on: February 16, 2014, 07:17:44 AM »So, um, is there anyway for a member to stay in just one weight? Like, let's say a member wants to stay at "heavyweight", but he's/she's quickly approaching the "superheavyweight" status, is it possible for him to stay at "heavyweight" despite passing the amount of posts needed to be a "superheavyweight"?
|