Words per minute (WPM): 90 Keystrokes: 469 Correct words: 89 Wrong words: 2
You reached 452 Points so you achieved position 2985 of 76736 on the ranking list (last 24 hours)
I don't use the standard typing configuration (left pinky on "A" and right on ";" with the rest of the fingers on "SDFJKL" and two thumbs on space bar); I just rest my hands wherever.
A baseplate anchor would trump the SnapperII in this case, for the weight and using less chassis space. May need more extenders though, unless you mount the drive motors statically.
Captain Mushbag Jason Jesus Bloberston the Jew whose hamster tasted of bacon when Logan ate it fried of Skajjalot from the former group of Staaaaaaag Patrol.
Would he be the guy that created Groundhog Day? :P
Wait until high school and find new people. If you still haven't made friends with the people you've wanted to be friends with for an entire four years, chances are they've judged you pretty harshly and will just feel uncomfortable talking to you...
But, it would still be an entirely different reality....
nope. It will be a different perception of the same reality.
But that's exactly what makes it a different reality, the fact that it is perceived differently by two groups. If they are perceiving the "same" reality differently, where is the original reality that they are both viewing? How does one know if the humans are viewing it right and the aliens Copy A, or the other way around, or if we're both wrong and humans are viewing Copy A and aliens Copy B, and the true reality is still out there? You don't know, because you never actually know if you're "outside the cave" or not, so to speak.
I think if that situation actually ever occurred the person who saw the outside world probably would think that he/she himself/herself would be crazy, had died and gone to heaven, etc..
If the people were in there so long then that world is reality. Perhaps not for the guards, but it's certainly the prisoners' reality.
Mathematics is the one absolute truth in the universe because it's principles can be proven solely through logic. Thus, it is synthetic a priori knowledge. My main point however, is that you cannot prove the existence of the chair you sit in any more than you can prove the existence of a God, unless you have faith in your own perception. Yet to not believe in your own perception would be considered illogical.
You've seen The Matrix at some point, haven't you? :P