This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Avalanche
Pages: 1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 ... 153
901
« on: April 02, 2016, 03:31:56 PM »
9.
902
« on: April 02, 2016, 09:16:47 AM »
Name and Weightclass?
903
« on: April 02, 2016, 07:29:03 AM »
MOAR BELUGAMAN!
904
« on: April 01, 2016, 12:10:34 PM »
Also, people need to remember Avalanche's past exploits 
That is very bloody rich of you to say that. Back up your words in a DSL challenge.
y
Challenging other members to a battle to decide a pointless online disagreement is pretty childish and shows that you're insecure tbh
So you would prefer I gave a stupid, salty response instead? I really don't actually care that much, I just haven't done much on RA2 recently and need a reason to actually play + TRB deciding its a good idea to beat the dead horse + I have an itching for doing some curb-stomping lately = DSL 2.2 Challenge, let's go. Anyways, back on topic. Yeah, RA2 wiki needs a bit of an overhaul.
905
« on: April 01, 2016, 11:20:16 AM »
Also, people need to remember Avalanche's past exploits
That is very bloody rich of you to say that. Back up your words in a DSL challenge.
906
« on: March 31, 2016, 09:26:59 AM »
If the staff really do value its importance for newbies to recognize helpful users, there should be a drop-down list of reasons that you can select from when you give rep and abusers should simply have their privileges taken away. Otherwise, it can stay as a fun but meaningless way to show appreciation for other users - if people think the numbers will confuse new people, just don't show the totals or only show the sum of the 5 most recent actions.
Playing Devil's Advocate - not necessarily my own views - I could argue that more limitations over less would be the way to make this fairer.
If only select people can rep, people that could be 'chosen' to spot the good and bad over the forum, you add some accountability which is always important.
Also, with more people able to rep you just end up with any action getting more response, so if someone did something 'nooby', they would end up with minus a lot more than they may deserve.
Just a few points to discuss.
Why not have the drop down list, but then also have the other members write extra comments upon this one down or up rep so that it only counts as a single point but can have lots of people's inputs?
907
« on: March 31, 2016, 07:52:49 AM »
keep it, let everyone past Heavyweight + colored names use it. Done.
If not the above, then remove it.
That, and maybe reset the reputation of certain members if they are not properly represented by it (ACAMS -100? What even?) if we want to make it a more serious affair. That, and remove certain member's priviledges to it. If you wanted a total reform for some reason then you could totally reset rep but that's probably not going to be necessary.
acams's rep is obviously a joke.
Thank you, Captain Obvious.
Which means no-one is actually going to take his rep seriously, except you, who seems to think it's a point worth discussing.
Do you not realise that I was joking?
908
« on: March 31, 2016, 07:42:57 AM »
keep it, let everyone past Heavyweight + colored names use it. Done.
If not the above, then remove it.
That, and maybe reset the reputation of certain members if they are not properly represented by it (ACAMS -100? What even?) if we want to make it a more serious affair. That, and remove certain member's priviledges to it. If you wanted a total reform for some reason then you could totally reset rep but that's probably not going to be necessary.
acams's rep is obviously a joke.
Thank you, Captain Obvious.
-rep for being rude
Well, I am scarred for life.
909
« on: March 31, 2016, 07:19:10 AM »
keep it, let everyone past Heavyweight + colored names use it. Done.
If not the above, then remove it.
That, and maybe reset the reputation of certain members if they are not properly represented by it (ACAMS -100? What even?) if we want to make it a more serious affair. That, and remove certain member's priviledges to it. If you wanted a total reform for some reason then you could totally reset rep but that's probably not going to be necessary.
acams's rep is obviously a joke.
Thank you, Captain Obvious.
910
« on: March 31, 2016, 05:58:42 AM »
keep it, let everyone past Heavyweight + colored names use it. Done.
If not the above, then remove it.
That, and maybe reset the reputation of certain members if they are not properly represented by it (ACAMS -100? What even?) if we want to make it a more serious affair. That, and remove certain member's priviledges to it. If you wanted a total reform for some reason then you could totally reset rep but that's probably not going to be necessary.
911
« on: March 29, 2016, 11:42:48 AM »
So what is the list of events that are happening?
Well, despite the appearance of the better version, the tournament will be in SR, so the only 3 in that. Make 3 zooks, one for each event.
Should we alternate between the two versions of the game inbetween tournaments (A la BBEANS1,3 and 5 were stock, then 2,4 and 6 were DSL? I feek the older events are superior.
912
« on: March 28, 2016, 07:51:11 AM »
For those having issues launching the game, change the 3 shortcuts to "C:\Program Files (x86)\BAMZOOKi\ instead of Program Files, because Bamzooki was made before even Program Files x64 or x86 was a thing. Also, do you think anyone else has a copy of the game with some of the online uploaded zooks on it? Would be interesting to find some of them.
913
« on: March 27, 2016, 06:02:29 AM »
what is this thing ? It looks... interesting... is it a robot combat simulator, or a physics simulator ?
Its more like creature sport physics simulator. You create things called Zooks. Yes. Zooks. It was a CBBC show, after all. I recommend it.
914
« on: March 26, 2016, 05:35:44 PM »
Where can i download this? Im sure I can bang out some entries.
915
« on: March 26, 2016, 07:55:00 AM »
this show. THIS ****ING SHOW. dear lord this show as one of the holy trifecta from my childhood along with robot wars and ed,edd and eddy. the show was soo good and the best part was the zook creator (even if it killed my computer and taugh my mom waht downloadable games were). i agree with avalanche also that the reboot was complete ass, it had none of what made the original show great, the original was humble and light-hearted and was more about the contestants rather than the zooks but the reboot turn the sport into a ****ING ILLEGAL SPORT BECAUSE CLEARLY WATCHINGB VIRTUAL REALITY ABOMINATIONS FIGHTING EACH OTHER IS THE SAME AS DOGS RAVAGING EACH OTHER IN EXCHANGE FOR A ****ING DENTASTIX!!
Calm thine breasts, good sir.
916
« on: March 26, 2016, 07:19:09 AM »
SO MANY MEMORIES. Yeah, anyone with the Pre-Series 4 (Street Rules version aka sh** one) please upload it i need it in my life.
917
« on: March 24, 2016, 05:30:17 PM »
For me microtransactions is fine if its skins and stuff but components is a no no for microtransactions for me.
For DLC Im fine with anything really arenas, skins, components
has this guy played robot arena 2 at all?
also he mentiones nerdcubed in a followup comment
ugh
Hey, NerdCubed did bring more attention to GTM, but as with all new joining members, only a few stayed.
I entered GTM cause of nerdcubed
We need to build a wall.
If serious: Go **** yourself. We need more members. If sarcastic: Go **** yourself. Trump is a bellend. Also, great memes.
918
« on: March 24, 2016, 04:45:49 PM »
For me microtransactions is fine if its skins and stuff but components is a no no for microtransactions for me.
For DLC Im fine with anything really arenas, skins, components
has this guy played robot arena 2 at all?
also he mentiones nerdcubed in a followup comment
ugh
Hey, NerdCubed did bring more attention to GTM, but as with all new joining members, only a few stayed.
919
« on: March 21, 2016, 02:29:48 PM »
which one of you guys posted this
http://steamcommunity.com/app/363530/discussions/0/385428458177012223/
...why?
This post pissed me off so much. It just shows off the elitist "PC MURRSTURR RAYSS ZOMG" that, frankly, turns me away from buying a proper pc. High requirements does not make the game better. In fact, that is usually quite the opposite.
Yeah, the best way to torpedo those arguments are simply to say RA2 for 13 years. Sure, a game's graphics may be old but it ****ing works. (Civilization V is a good example of a 2011 game's graphics being timeless.)
920
« on: March 18, 2016, 08:10:22 AM »
I'm either going to just make loads of bye-bots or just run a smaller tournament. I still hope people will still enter on this last day anyway XD
I think you should release all the rejected bots and let there be a consensus on whether or not they are irl, cause it seems like your being way too harsh.
Pages: 1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 ... 153
|
Show Posts