901
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: General Chatter Thread
« on: January 10, 2012, 11:53:16 AM »
Edit: Bad sentence structure resulting in bad communication.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 901
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: General Chatter Thread« on: January 10, 2012, 11:53:16 AM »
Edit: Bad sentence structure resulting in bad communication.
902
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Martymidgets DSL Showcase« on: January 10, 2012, 05:04:06 AM »
Lower the front 40 skirt down to titanium, back 40 skirts down to aluminum, add a side panel on top, and raise chassis armor to p5.
903
Challenge Board / Re: Naryar VS The Whole DSL Builder's Community (Battle)« on: January 08, 2012, 11:21:07 PM »
I don't mind a counter, actually I don't think a consistent counter for FSnS exist at MW or LW.
904
Challenge Board / Re: Naryar VS The Whole DSL Builder's Community (Battle)« on: January 08, 2012, 03:18:00 PM »
lol if I cap the spinspeed of Core Collapse Supernova, does that count as not relying on glitch?
905
Challenge Board / Re: Naryar VS The Whole DSL Builder's Community (Battle)« on: January 08, 2012, 02:50:20 PM »
Lol Urjak should enter a FSS and I should enter a FSnS just for lols.
906
Challenge Board / Re: Naryar VS The Whole DSL Builder's Community (Battle)« on: January 08, 2012, 02:19:52 PM »
Humm, are you going to use the same bot against all? If yes then I can enter my Sting Ray to force you out of options.
907
Chatterbox / Re: What Did You Get - 2011 Edition!« on: December 30, 2011, 05:47:38 AM »
Lol all I got was a buzz. That Devil Springs tasted nasty as hell.
One of my friend end up puking his stomach out though, so I guess I got a laugh too. 908
Discussion / Re: The Ranks - 2011« on: December 27, 2011, 03:08:53 AM »Im clearly the greatest at everything.. why did you even bring this back with no competition to rival my awesome :PAnd I am clearly the greatest stock builder since I have never lost a single stock match or stock tournament!!!! 909
Chatterbox / Re: Which fictional characters are you most like?« on: December 24, 2011, 08:23:06 AM »Since when did not knowing prevent anyone from making comments anyway?Most people can't really comment on others because they don't know what they're actually like.Actually, people around are more likely to know a person as well as or even better than they themselves know. 910
Chatterbox / Re: Which fictional characters are you most like?« on: December 23, 2011, 10:15:45 PM »Lol but the only emotion visible over the internet is rage quit, so you fit just fine here.I guess you could also say that I'm like Aht from Radiant Historia 911
Chatterbox / Re: The Big Questions of the Universe« on: December 22, 2011, 07:20:57 PM »FIFYI will say I am Christian because there is plenty of evidence for God's love if you look with an open mind, and because existence without God or heaven seems to me rather short, brutal, and utterly meaningless, and I'll leave it at that. Further elaboration would only turn into another pointless argument. Quote Besides, that god you claim to exist should know that he should present itself unambiguously to humanity, if he is well-intentioned. I have not seen any irrefutable proof of God existing.Free will unfortunately must come with this ambiguity, to present himself to humanity further than through his book will eliminate free will. Quote And you do not think that with an open mind, you can see existence without god or heaven as something different from being short, brutal and meaningless ?You can prevent aging, but you cannot be immortal. A risk of dying for reasons outside of aging will always exist. Quote Brutal, not necessarily, as frezal said.Maybe we just happen to live a very sheltered life. Even then, none of us can avoid death eventually. Quote And meaningless... you deny the right of godless or heavenless human beings to give meaning to their life ? Or you do not accept an individual's right to give an individual meaning to it's life, accepting only the notion of meaning of life if they are shared by a large community, such as the whole of a religion ? That seems pretty gloomy and even tyrannical to me.Actually without an external authority life itself cannot have a meaning because meaning requires interpretation, which requires life. Meaning happens during each episode in life where sentient being reflects on itself subjectively. Also, to claim individual has "rights" requires external authority. Without relying on God such "rights" will deteriorate into the law of each solvent states and it's culture. We just happen to live in one where individualism is popularized, and encouraged by consumerism. Plenty of regime in this world today still do not offer their citizens the kind of "rights" westerners come to expect. Their meaning and purpose are forced and any deviants will be lock up or killed. Quote Also, this is not a pointless argument. This is about the nature of existence itself ! As you say that it is a pointless argument, you sound like you want to avoid a religion argument.I find arguing over this topic quite pointless, since I don't have the arrogance to claim that I know about the nature of existence itself. However the method of "faith" consistently fails in finding truth for just about everything thus far, so I am comfortable with calling bogus for all things determined with such method. 912
Chatterbox / Re: Which fictional characters are you most like?« on: December 21, 2011, 03:43:38 AM »
I am like the Zerg Overmind form first Starcraft 1.
913
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: General Chatter Thread« on: December 20, 2011, 08:39:47 PM »I was actually going to recommend it to women who "like" talking about their problems.......Counselling was crap.It's a waste of time. I don't recommend it to anyone 914
Chatterbox / Re: The Big Questions of the Universe« on: December 19, 2011, 04:46:36 AM »Maybe you can try thisexistence without God or heaven seems to me rather short, brutal, and utterly meaninglessPrecisely why I'm a theist. But all religions have those restraints on them that makes them all look really rather stupid if you take a step back from them. Which is why I don't really follow a proper religion, though me and Suzume used to have fun with his made up Pseudoshintotheism and he'd make up some really silly rule that we'd follow for a day and then ditch http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discordianism Despite what the name might imply, it is not MLP related. 915
Chatterbox / Re: The Big Questions of the Universe« on: December 19, 2011, 12:53:07 AM »Now why is MNB defending the Bible; I wouldn't have pegged him for a Christian. Just playing devil's advocate? (Or God's advocate, as I suppose it would be in this case.)Most people argue about religion not to convince others to believe, but just to erase contradictory evidences such that they can continue believing in it themselves. Argument never works in convince the opposing side anything. 916
Chatterbox / Re: The Big Questions of the Universe« on: December 17, 2011, 06:45:28 PM »and face eternal suffering.Buddhism is a lenient religion, they give guidelines rather than rules, and don't pester you about random crap.But if you don't follow said "guidelines", you won't reach nirvana. 917
Chatterbox / Re: The Big Questions of the Universe« on: December 17, 2011, 06:34:45 PM »I don't consider Buddhism a religion. I consider it a lifestyle. As a general rule, religions have to have some belief about the world in general (and this normally results in a god), otherwise you're just following a different way of life.Buddhism certainly has it's own sets of supernatural beliefs which puts it in the category of religion. They just rely on the Karma and Reincarnation rather than God to lay down the moral judgments. It is run by the same trick, reward and punishment by supernatural forces. And for an extra kicker, Buddhism also believe in heaven and hell. You do realize that is Budai and not Gautama Buddha right?Doesn't look very fat to me(Image removed from quote.) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budai 918
Chatterbox / Re: The Big Questions of the Universe« on: December 16, 2011, 02:20:39 PM »Maybe 123's talking about the Old Testament ? As I remember, God was pretty damn violent (not that there's anything wrong with that) back then.Every part other than the life of Jesus pretty much. Which includes old Testament and half of the New Testament. To say they are "hateful and violent prone" is really an understatement. Followers who take those parts literally also shown "hateful and violent prone" traits. As for intuitively immoral, that is based on the harms principle. You can always argue for other forms of moral system, but so far the only argument that came out is "divine will" which actually requires at least heaven and hell to be taken literally. If you just read the Jesus part, that's not so bad. To be precise, it doesn't matter what I draw out of it since I neither believe nor follow it. What does matter is the huge among of hates and violence among those who does follows it. They can certainly find passages in the Bible that justify their behaviors.Not take the bible literally is the worst attempt to save a religion that claims to know the truth about everything. What the Bible teaches are so hateful, violent prone, and intuitively immoral, that it can only be justify by being the literal truth.There's nothing oppressive or immoral about the Bible. That you would even say such a thing proves that you understand little to nothing about it. And of course it's the literal and absolute truth. To say anything else is preposterous. 919
Chatterbox / Re: The Big Questions of the Universe« on: December 16, 2011, 06:18:12 AM »
Not take the bible literally is the worst attempt to save a religion that claims to know the truth about everything. What the Bible teaches are so hateful, violent prone, and intuitively immoral, that it can only be justify by being the literal truth.
I don't know how anyone can swallow the oppressive teachings without believing in the literal truth of heaven and hell. 920
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: General Chatter Thread« on: December 14, 2011, 08:26:22 PM »Hey don't be hatin. Alcohol is what keeps me awake for assignments and tests.the other for drinking a bottle of Vodka during the school day and passing out drunk.hahahahaha fail |