This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - System32
Pages: 1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 [43] 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 ... 252
841
« on: August 05, 2011, 04:51:01 PM »
That's because you've become a mixture of whiny git (evidenced with that exact post) and minion to Sparkles.
Kinda self explanatory, especially the latter.
A basic snivelling thing like you should be the last one calling anyone "a whiny git".
842
« on: August 05, 2011, 01:44:18 PM »
You guys suck.
Says Mr. Pony Signature.
Man, you've gone soft.
It was a test. I thought it worked.
843
« on: August 05, 2011, 01:38:33 PM »
You guys suck.
844
« on: August 05, 2011, 10:38:47 AM »
Looking back on this thread I'm glad I made it.
You see how much crap still happens in topics nowadays? It cold be worse.
Hmm, is the GCT encouraging off topic spam within the forums or not?
845
« on: August 04, 2011, 06:13:06 PM »
Naryar's works better. Arguing why it should be in is better than a goddamn popularity contest poll consisting of "Vote Botface X just because" entries.
Don't get me wrong, I like Naryar's idea in principle. However, the problem is that people will vote, and give their reasoning. People like Clickbeetle will probably give a detailed explanation, others might give a line or two. How do we know who has given a detailed enough vote? Do we throw out their vote? Force them to redo it? All I see happening is the voter turnout being reduced, and thus the results less representative.
You will judge, and other sensible/rational/fair people as well.
I would prefer the many members of the forum decide, not just me and a select others. I mean if 52 of our members select the inductees, we will get a representation of current collective, not just what the AU's and veterans think. Besides, if only a select few vote, other members can accuse them of bias. When the whole forum votes, that bias is drowned out.
Anyone can post. Almost all reasons are valid. I never said AU and Vets only post, I said anyone can, if they have a reason for nominating said robot. I could easily set up a mock "RPesque" example thread for what I am talking about here.
846
« on: August 04, 2011, 04:00:04 PM »
C on Bio Higher, A on Int 2 Chemistry, B on Int 2 English and who needs maths anyway! '>.>
SUCK IT NFX
Highers: A in Maths, A in Physics, A in Chemistry, A in Biology, B in Music, C in Computing.
Now what were you saying about sucking on it, Sys? =P
I never said anything about sucking on things. Your mind is in the gutter.
847
« on: August 04, 2011, 03:20:51 PM »
C on Bio Higher, A on Int 2 Chemistry, B on Int 2 English and who needs maths anyway! '>.>
SUCK IT NFX
848
« on: August 04, 2011, 03:04:55 PM »
I'm considering making an official GTM page so we can control what goes on there...
Don't. Sometimes people just want to talk off the record, and making a page official and controlled will probably make people leave it and find another way to communicate.
Not to mention, you shouldn't try to regulate what goes on the internet, as you will fail.
As much as you are right, I'm just tired of TX spamming shock sites cause he's md he got banned.
849
« on: August 04, 2011, 02:41:03 PM »
850
« on: August 04, 2011, 02:38:08 AM »
Or maybe we should each, rather than vote via a poll, post a detailed list of the bots we would see the more in this, and reasons why we think they are legendary. Sure it's moar work, but the hall of fame should be more precise and fair rather than influenced by some random n00b who sees this thread and votes for a random bot.
I'd much rather have 52 voters on a poll than 5-10 detailed votes (which were pretty much what the nomination PMs were for). The more people who vote, the more representative the Hall of Fame will be of our communities's thoughts. I do plan to expand the Hall with subsequent nominations, so bots that people think should have gotten in will get a chance to get in.
Next time we hold this stupd crap I'm gaming it like an international chess match. (Or Ohio.) Naryar's works better. Arguing why it should be in is better than a goddamn popularity contest poll consisting of "Vote Botface X just because" entries.
851
« on: August 03, 2011, 11:54:04 PM »
Uneven bot, useless back area, chassis space. That's what's wrong so far.
It's fix the asymmetrical placement, and then see if the wedge is done unevenly.
After that, Shrink it down.
852
« on: August 03, 2011, 11:32:51 PM »
Jesus Christ you are such an idiot. Let me go over everything you mentioned as nice as I physically can. SFTW: Gained memetic fame for the "worst entry in a tournament" trope. The community chose this by meme theory. ITI V: Popularised the "Razor guy run" trope, while not being the namer of the concept, became the codifier. EMERGENCY: De facto most difficult bot to face in "stock" stock. You are an idiot of the highest order to think this bot does not apply. Mako: Defined the basic go-to design for DSL VS. Second place BBEANS winner. Project Trinity: doesn't matter whether you think the glitch is useless or whatever, it was the bot that showcased it first. (God mode does not deserve this as HAX mode is still being debated and is losing the controversial nature of it's essence.) You know, you are right. SnSnSnS should be in. I'll write the reason up here: SnSnSnSnS: Most overhyped bot in RA2 history. The only reason it is in the hall of fame is because the creator won't shut up. We advise all whiny little morons that this robot is a prime example of the idea that moaning and whining enough can get you anything.* * Moaning and whining cannot get you anything. You are an idiot for thinking this.
853
« on: August 03, 2011, 10:46:43 PM »
854
« on: August 03, 2011, 10:51:45 AM »
The only ones with any lick of fame are the touney winners listed, the second placers, the ones who made new types and the ones that used glitches first, wth the exeption of god mode.
855
« on: August 03, 2011, 10:36:00 AM »
I'm blaming you for that.
I'm blaming you for that, too.
Now now S32, no need to get personal here.
I'm not being personal. I'm just saying that you are the sole reason this RA2 hall of fame thing shouldn't ever be acknowledged because you turned it into a glorified BOTM.
856
« on: August 02, 2011, 10:09:32 PM »
**** YOU NFX THIS IS OUR ANTHEM AND THAT'S FINAL!
857
« on: August 02, 2011, 09:13:06 PM »
858
« on: August 02, 2011, 08:58:22 PM »
There is no facebook.
859
« on: August 02, 2011, 08:51:24 PM »
LOL @ TX calling for bans on facebook.
860
« on: August 02, 2011, 06:14:25 PM »
Well there are a few bots in there that never won anything and weren't significant or original. I'm blaming you for that. Is it wrong for me to campaign for my own bot, whether I think that it deserves a spot or not? Yes. It is wrong. You are wrong for thinking otherwise. This was supposed to be a hallmark set of examples of the history of this community. Not a glorified BOTM. Well, it was. I'm blaming you for that, too. Maybe if S32 ever got off his ass and built something he could've been considered, and he probably would've supported it. That was uncalled for. No need to get personal here.
Pages: 1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 [43] 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 ... 252
|
Show Posts