841
Stock Showcases / Re: Re: Suede's Stock Showcase
« on: April 23, 2016, 07:49:38 AM »
...Omni ?
Also won't really work, i'm afraid.
Also won't really work, i'm afraid.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 841
Stock Showcases / Re: Re: Suede's Stock Showcase« on: April 23, 2016, 07:49:38 AM »
...Omni ?
Also won't really work, i'm afraid. 842
Stock Showcases / Re: Calmarius' stock showcase« on: April 23, 2016, 06:35:03 AM »
That's a strange chassis shape...
843
General Support / Re: DSL V2.2 crashes when editing teams and bot controls« on: April 23, 2016, 05:50:08 AM »
In case you like windowed, you can also run it windowed without problems with XP comp. mode.
845
General Support / Re: DSL V2.2 crashes when editing teams and bot controls« on: April 21, 2016, 05:12:45 PM »
Compatibility mode fixes it, yes. And yes, it's due to you running the game windowed.
846
Discussion / Re: [Concept] A yet unnamed mod(R's mod)« on: April 21, 2016, 01:52:17 PM »I am aware of that, however when I entered DSL I had a hard time finding the right components, too much antstuff(they can be fun) but only two drive motors?(I know that Stock doesn't have that many more and that I should give DSL more time, which I'll definitely do, however it actually seemed harder to find useable parts in DSL) Didn't help that my robot drove in circles when going backwards(some weight problems with batteries) and that DSL has so far challenging AI, so imagine this to be a bit more beginner friendly, aimed at people who want to build semi realisic bots, like probably intended by the original RA2 team.A balanced stock mod would be interesting.That's basically the idea, a beginner friendly stock with more parts and possibly having some RW(not sure about Battlebots) remakes. What I was trying to say is what are you trying to make has already it's niche taken, by DSL. It will be extremely hard to make your mod better than DSL and more popular. A balanced Stock mod with new stock replicas would be cool, however, since there is no popular mod who does this. Also did you not click the dropdown menus ? About 2/3 of the DSL components are in dropdown menus. You know, there's a little arrow when you select a component, like in Windows :P Standard armor weights and strengths, and as such strength/kg, can be changed. You'll notice that the DSL and Stock chassis armors are quite different. 847
Discussion / Re: [Concept] A yet unnamed mod(R's mod)« on: April 21, 2016, 08:58:28 AM »A balanced stock mod would be interesting.That's basically the idea, a beginner friendly stock with more parts and possibly having some RW(not sure about Battlebots) remakes. that's what DSL is supposed to do... burst motor speed can be changed in the txt, yes. change weightclasses... just change manually the weightclasses in the bot file, and say "LW is X kg, MW is Y kg, HW is X kg" like in ironforge. 848
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Suede's DSL Showcase« on: April 21, 2016, 08:52:24 AM »
seems like it doesn't turn fast enough to counter the spinner's torque
849
Stock Showcases / Re: R01's Showcase Thread« on: April 21, 2016, 07:46:00 AM »
why are you using spoilers for bots as well ?
850
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: Zootopia« on: April 19, 2016, 06:25:21 PM »only partly 851
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: Zootopia« on: April 19, 2016, 05:49:05 PM »
I have no issues with anthropomorphic animals, unless:
-it becomes creepy -it becomes fetishized -fans of anthropomorphic animals bring them into unrelated forums/discussions -fans of anthropomorphic animals stir sh** and drama about other people not liking them Of course, this looks like typical mindless cute, feel-good stuff, so nope. 852
Discussion / Re: [Concept] A yet unnamed mod(R's mod)« on: April 19, 2016, 05:36:07 PM »
A balanced stock mod would be interesting.
853
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: The General Chatter Thread.« on: April 19, 2016, 05:29:18 PM »POSSIBLE OFFENSES AND WHAT YOU RISK it's not flaming/trolling (insulting/troll baiting others) or spamming (excessive repetition of stuff) He's just expressing his incredulity in a foul mouthed manner. It IS however typical n00b behavior, and I took care of it. 854
Stock Showcases / Re: Calmarius' stock showcase« on: April 19, 2016, 05:24:31 PM »gtfoSnapperIIs (the blue bursts) usually make terrible wedges. I want none of this in a new member's showcase ! I'll be watching this thread, so behave. And DG, please do not argue over RA2 with stock builders that have about five times your experience, thank you. 855
Tournament Archives / Re: Trios of Terror II - Signups« on: April 19, 2016, 09:28:07 AM »i would be willing to team up with a competent stock builder to provide DSL and maybe ironforge botsif redace would allow it, i could drop my dsl and/or IF bots to team up. both of them were rushed to get in within the 8 entry limit Yeah, OK. 856
Tournament Archives / Re: Trios of Terror II - Signups« on: April 19, 2016, 08:44:29 AM »
i would be willing to team up with a competent stock builder to provide DSL and maybe ironforge bots
857
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: The General Chatter Thread.« on: April 19, 2016, 08:42:30 AM »Robot arena irl: i am tempted to edit that with immobility counters and corny one-liners from the announcer 858
Ironforge TC Showcases / Re: Mr AS Ironforge showcase« on: April 18, 2016, 03:43:22 AM »
I like the piston drive poker.
And i'll do a proper FotNS bot sometime... it will involve a lot of pistons on bursts 859
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: Zootopia« on: April 17, 2016, 12:10:13 PM »please tell me this isnt the new mlp hear the man. 860
Custom Components Showcase / Re: Deadgeno's showcase of Other Stuff (FFS Creature of broken physics)« on: April 17, 2016, 10:41:03 AM »
what badger is saying is that usually no one cares about bots with cheat components unless they have cool designs or are visually impressive. here you are just using cheat components to be better than the other bots.
no one's forbidding you to showcase but you know... showcases are supposed to show bots to others. if the others are uninterested, there's no point in showcasing. now i think you got the point. |