This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Sage
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ... 334
781
« on: July 12, 2013, 02:53:26 AM »
you do know rockmelt is built off of chrome
782
« on: July 11, 2013, 10:45:33 PM »
I would make the wedge shallower and use shinies for the wheels to get the weight
783
« on: July 10, 2013, 11:07:31 PM »
I really do not see the problem... i mean sure we can be like "yo man your splashes would be better with more bot less butt" altho in the end it really doesnt matter and we should not be reprimanding him or get angry with him
784
« on: July 10, 2013, 09:59:26 PM »
Guys he can do what he wants lol it's his showcase. Chillllllaxxxxxx
785
« on: July 09, 2013, 12:03:17 PM »
Shoulda tried UNBEETABLE :P
but that's a cool idea. Go Bear!
786
« on: July 08, 2013, 04:42:03 PM »
Wow! That looks great.
Yea, razors are the superior weapon for this type of robot. Maces are ONLY good on some rammers and HS.
787
« on: July 08, 2013, 11:40:02 AM »
Using a servo and disc in that way is actually really clever. Cool plow skin as well!
One thing to realize about FS (face spinners, what you have built) is that they don't actually grind the front of the opposing robot but rather the undersides. At least, they should for maximum damage potential. So the upside down plow is actually hindering this performance.
Once you get it optimized for underside gut ripping, remember to rotate the razor tips so that one edge is perpendicular to the edge of the disc. This gives more chance of the razor hitting the underside of the opponent.
788
« on: July 07, 2013, 06:07:40 PM »
The MW side hammer looks really cool. What's with everyone using claws all of a sudden? At least use the chrome claws, theyre so much cooler.
789
« on: July 03, 2013, 04:10:26 PM »
That's actually a cool idea.
790
« on: July 02, 2013, 03:10:23 PM »
i want hoj vs a billion robots
You only need one. ULTIMATUM.
791
« on: July 02, 2013, 03:08:19 PM »
Those two bots look SO SIMILAR to two that I made...
Umm Dirty Bones and some bot I don't think I named.
792
« on: July 02, 2013, 02:41:07 AM »
Venko we all like your insane stuff.
793
« on: July 01, 2013, 05:26:07 PM »
You're a god.
794
« on: June 30, 2013, 10:06:39 PM »
What was the reason for doing three nifties? Otherwise it's cool. The snapper load looks difficult
795
« on: June 29, 2013, 02:18:52 PM »
1) 2-3 hours. some take days 2) FU*K THIS BOT (Image removed from quote.)
Hell yes. 798.8, 2 blacks. you know, a 36HS. built off one axle mount.
:D
(P.S. Looks better at full resolution... stupid automatic image resizer >:O)
3) Solstice. its the popup HS wedge thing with battleaxes in my sig
796
« on: June 28, 2013, 12:17:58 AM »
Very nice. Love it.
797
« on: June 27, 2013, 04:04:59 PM »
Venko outwedges the NF with a snapper2 wedges MW bot - meh
Without giving us your "best wedges ever" secret most of us think it's just dumb luck like most wedges are.
798
« on: June 27, 2013, 09:43:05 AM »
I think it's a stock thing, since the bots are so tall and they always try to trim those little corners.
Still, the only relevant application I see are for IRL. I think for both stock and DSL the focus should be on reducing effective hitbox, even if said chassis end up a few kg more.
Really? I think a few kg here and there is much more important in stock than anywhere else.
799
« on: June 27, 2013, 04:09:56 AM »
What? You mean people actually believed in that kinna nonsense? I been sinking in my chassis to save weight for ages.
Rather or not sinking in can save weight will depend on the height of the chassis relative to the distance between the 2 points. The lower the chassis and the further the 2 points are, the more likely you are to save weight. I sink my chassis all the time to save KG.
If you want to be really anal about that you can calculate the first derivative of the surface area equation between 2 points, and find the instance where it is == 0. You can probably write an excel spreadsheet to do just that.
what do you mean sinking? i'm unfamiliar with the term
800
« on: June 27, 2013, 01:12:41 AM »
I thought a right angle was flat in the case of 3d objects.
let me restate: its always better to use a diagonal side to connect to points instead of a right angle to connect 2 points because RA2 calculates weight by surface area.
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ... 334
|
Show Posts