This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Gulden
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ... 67
741
« on: August 11, 2017, 08:57:00 AM »
I used the search thing on here and saw no sign of one in GTM history so...
So Havok and I have just recently done a taglocke. With the end result being... Havok quit midway, claimed he cheated, and left Geometry the Geodude to collect moss.
Seeing as how I: A. Lack real life friends, B. Have an unreliable brother, and C. spend half my time nowadays on GTM; I was wondering if a GTM Taglocke was possible...
Recording would probably be optional, however, posting what events happened after your turn, I'd highly recommend.
Its simple Nuzlocke rules, except after a player completes a gym, they export a SAV file and give the file to the next person in line. Its simple. Hit the Export Button and save it as a battery file. .png) Next, Go to the File host, and PM the next person in line the SAV file. (Note you might have to save ingame beforehand and tell them what route you've caught pokemon already) .png) Next the person who received the SAV file Imports the SAV file. .png) And finds out that the person before them has been playing more than they should've. .png)
Anyone up furret?(Image removed from quote.)
If so, I'd like to ask you guys what game to play and which gym you'll take. (First come, first serve)
Game: Pokemon (What type is yet to be decided)
Gym 1:
Gym 2:
Gym 3:
Gym 4:
Gym 5:
Gym 6:
Gym 7:
Gym 8:
Champion:
Players:
Silverfish (from PM)
GuildenFlame (from IRL)
Shield (from discord)
Wenxianglee (from discord)
NeighImACarrot(from discord)
Ty4er (from Discord)
HavokMcCheater (From Reply)
Hoppin (From Reply)
YeastisBeast (From Reply)
No need to PM me, but in case you did, this'll make sure you know what has been voted as of now.
Silverfish-(Randomized) Platinum (No clauses mentioned)
Hoppin-Platinum
HavokMcCheater-Crystal (No clauses mentioned)
Yeastisbeast-BW2 (No clauses mentioned)
Edit: Idk how to continue this... someone wanna claim a gym?
Is this ever gonna get started?
Problem is noone claimed any gyms or wanted any clauses so I'm at a loss asto what to do... Pretty sure we're doing a platinum lock though...
742
« on: August 08, 2017, 12:49:20 PM »
Kinda reminds me of Carbonize. Not bad.
743
« on: August 06, 2017, 10:33:53 PM »
The BW seems compact and a good design.
I like what you did with the clep+beta tail for the SnS but the chassis seems kinda dull.
Neon Izzy is getting better. I'd question the lack of supports on the motors though.
Please tell me that Flatmotors are allowed
Also yea goblin was a quick entry for gtm live as a multibot
If you're talking LVDR then yeah.
744
« on: August 06, 2017, 10:18:36 PM »
The BW seems compact and a good design.
I like what you did with the clep+beta tail for the SnS but the chassis seems kinda dull.
Neon Izzy is getting better. I'd question the lack of supports on the motors though.
745
« on: August 04, 2017, 07:10:59 PM »
I'll call myself a bit surprised at how well cling did. Course, there's nothing one can do about the AI.
Anyway, against RIOT, I'll probably lose my sawblade, then get cut down by the metagame.
746
« on: August 03, 2017, 09:52:13 PM »
INFP
I felt like I shoulda seen that coming to be honest...
747
« on: August 01, 2017, 10:19:50 AM »
I knew spaztastic would lose, but I question why it only spun one way. It moves forward with back and forth movement.
748
« on: July 31, 2017, 10:27:57 AM »
RedAce has entered the vicinity.
Botomatic Follows
749
« on: July 30, 2017, 01:01:26 PM »
Alright, I'm back.
Fun fact: Christianity is apparently the true religion...
Anyway... Sadly, all that happened was the denial of Kaiser112183
750
« on: July 25, 2017, 03:28:23 PM »
Why don't the saws line up?
The RA2 is a jerk like that
751
« on: July 25, 2017, 11:07:25 AM »
Just a note for the future, for Wednesday-Sunday, I'll be dead.
I've hired a retributionist, but they say it'll be a while before they can revive me, so I'll be gone for a little while.
So don't go nuts when I don't respond to entries.
Edit: Dying now.
752
« on: July 24, 2017, 09:30:27 PM »
Hammer drums... I did that once...
I will say, the wheel setup is a bit off, but I look forward to seeing it otherwise.
753
« on: July 24, 2017, 08:03:33 PM »
And there goes another possible BotM entry...
754
« on: July 21, 2017, 09:48:05 PM »
Just to note as this has been a recurring problem (for some reason), I don't have Rob's Black wedges.
Use DCS's instead.
Such and issue was held with jdg37, however, the robot is now accepted.
755
« on: July 20, 2017, 05:40:12 PM »
TGM is first.
The Roboteer is second
Denying Playzooki.
I can't wait to see what everyone else is preparing.
756
« on: July 20, 2017, 03:24:40 PM »
Very cool, however I think the polycarbinate on the weapon support shouldn't be there.
757
« on: July 19, 2017, 11:11:41 AM »
Idea: Ban Avalanche from the tournament so he'll finally shut the **** up?
I honestly don't mind Avalanche. Besides, he'd do quite the opposite of shutting up if I were to ban him. Anyway, if these are the only rules that'll be suggested then the sign-up phase will be coming soon.
758
« on: July 18, 2017, 08:55:05 PM »
Aw-The bye is very much welcome. I'd feel I'd do well against Fibbly Wibbly, but inch punch might be a wild card.
Bw-I entered a walker that is crazy at best. I stand no chance.
Lw-I feel like I can win the first match, all depends on how much damage I can do.
Mw-Proto fly could go either way, but I think the arms will fly off. I want cling to go far so badly...
Cw-"This match could go either way" is what I would be saying if Iffy Lifty could lift anything...
Hw-Antivirus looks like it could go all the way. However, the second round competitors look quite fierce...
SHw-I wanna punt that minibot so badly. Too be honest, I don't expect to use torment much. It's an ugly mofo.
759
« on: July 17, 2017, 07:31:14 PM »
Removing the giant quote thing
Firstly, WBC only did that with illegal pre-filled bottles with nitrogen at higher pressure than allowed. They only ever did it once.
Hm... learn something new every day... And actually RW stacked the deck in favor of spinners by retaining an active weapon rule, plus putting a sh**load of spinners in, and not really having any spinner killers outside of Foxic and Wyrm. I mean, did you even watch S9?
Check section 14.2Finally, do you want half the field to be overpowered flippers that send robots into the ceiling with every flip? Because that's what you are going to get unless you prevent Paladin/Aether Paradise/Delta levels of power from being accepted.
Half the field last time were lackluster Hammers... I'm open for a change... Besides, you don't decide what bots people make. I'm half expecting a couple of drum bots, tbh. Also, you're sticking to a sh** team system that is going to make the tournament worse. Why? You're making a sequel to a tournament, why not improve what was clearly bad about the tournament?
Cus This moment was adorable.
760
« on: July 17, 2017, 06:37:02 PM »
"I'll have 1 Havok Restart per match. If a second occurs, the culprit of the explosion will be DQed."
Problem:
Robot A rips off an flail from Robot B. Robot B havoks.
Single Havok Restart used up.
Robot B rips off a flail from Robot A. Robot A is the culprit. Robot A is DQ'd despite having the same number of Havoks as Robot B.
Replacement rule: If a robot havoks twice (and both times it is certainyl its fault) in a match, they will be disqualified.
Good point. Also, I'm going to request a limit on flipper power. I just don't think it's fair for a flipper to be able to send people into the ceiling or flip people OOTA from the middle of the arena. I'm all for competition, but it's just not fun or fair to have a robot able to ****ing curbstomp opponents like that, and it's arguably not very realistic either: but even if it was, it's a game that will never be a perfect simulation of real life.
If this rule isn't implemented, I'll probably be sending in a BS flipper because it's either that or getting sh**canned by a BS flipper.
You're trying to what Robot Wars are doing to spinners, but with flippers. Besides, If Wheely Big Cheese could toss a robot halfway across the arena, anyone can. P.S. Why are you only doing this to me and not in other tournaments?  It's really easy for me to snap under pressure... I would appreciate instead of doing a "entrant chooses their team" system, you did a draft system, maybe with one person picking a member at a time? There are other tournaments. My format is choose your own adventure. Mr As and Thracker did it as you requested in their LvDs.
Also, it would be cool if instead of using your robots as spare robots, you used entrants from the original LvD. Just to remove literally all bias possible. Then who wouldn't choose Paladin? And if people just re-enter their robots, we'd have doubles.
A: Just because somebody did it that way, doesn't mean you can't do it that way. Also the method you have right now is quite frankly sh** as by sheer luck one team can be blessed with all the 3 burst / ridiculously powerful flippers of any amount of bursts (if you allow them) and the other team can be left with none. A draft at least allows the captains to tactically split apart OP robots and replaces luck with strategic choice.
Can't stop what I enjoy. B: Ban re-entries and choose a small pool of robots that do not have sequels entered in the tournament, maybe?
As cool as it is, it would bring up a lot of problems. Such as if someone clones of Lost Cause. Do I count it as a Grindr ripoff? Besides... You act like we're gonna need Spare robots...
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ... 67
|
Show Posts