This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Pwnator
Pages: 1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 ... 364
701
« on: April 09, 2013, 12:19:51 AM »
So I can use maces and razors to protect the chassis rather than casters and it wouldn't be a rammer because the bot is too slow to ram?
702
« on: April 08, 2013, 11:54:06 PM »
wait wat
are you serious
you could've just used the irons for holding the bot in place
or protecting the chassis
or you know, just ditch the rammer hybrid thing, because by your definition i can place a mace on an anchor to protect a motor and that already counts as a rammer
703
« on: April 08, 2013, 11:35:33 PM »
its too bad that hybrids count as two bot types (and you already have a rammer) asdfghjklasdfghjkl aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh ...now i have to look for a lw in my rd folder
704
« on: April 08, 2013, 11:03:03 AM »
waddup  60% of my ARBBC team. Made a new AW (plastic, not invertible, but whatevs at least it has a unique chassis lol), upgraded the BW (all weapons hit at the same time), and the LW is old. ...and I just found out I don't have a decent MW that isn't generic. And I'll probably skim through my RD folder for a HW because I'm too lazy.
705
« on: April 08, 2013, 06:45:00 AM »
This can be good, if I find somehow more weight to spend on wider and taller cage.
*rides away from the ghost thread*
140cms?
706
« on: April 08, 2013, 04:11:58 AM »
dat static setup
I always thought a motor setup like that wouldn't fit because the chassis would be unnecessarily high.
but that seriously looks coooooooooool
707
« on: April 06, 2013, 12:34:01 AM »
pwnator also did something like that for his jupitor rebuild that he tried for SCv4, see the starcore thread in modifications and designs (?)
actually i only posted it in my showcase because it looked sloppy lawl  So yeah, I used static irons instead of ramplates, which should help just in case something prevents it from spinning. But yeah, it still looks sloppy.
708
« on: April 05, 2013, 10:49:12 AM »
That looks so damn cool. If it turns too slowly, how about turning the drive around?
709
« on: April 02, 2013, 12:00:58 PM »
I'll probably prepare something around April 6 or so. I've got 3 exams and a project due within the next 3 days.
710
« on: April 01, 2013, 12:27:34 PM »
I HATE YOU
[Edit] Actually, I can delete the post, but then I would be the only person to be trolled by Sage. So yeah.
711
« on: March 31, 2013, 04:48:32 AM »
*snip*
You should've seen this coming if you're going to post in this topic. :P
712
« on: March 29, 2013, 09:54:33 PM »
I dont think I can make it invertible.
...Grannies?
713
« on: March 29, 2013, 08:19:30 AM »
#2 makes me laugh because it says it has the best drive to weight ratio of any UHW, when 1 and 3 have better ones.
Actually 2 still has a better drive-to-weight ratio than 3. But yeah, 1 should still be faster. Shame Total Overkill didn't really go overkill on armor. 8 plows ain't a lot but hey, it still gets my vote.
714
« on: March 28, 2013, 11:45:45 PM »
NEW COAL MINER PLS
715
« on: March 28, 2013, 09:10:04 PM »
Click chassis tab > spin motors > quickly click components tab > repeat.
This would seem tedious for any motor faster than a bird, though. I just attach a RAD to the motor and load it out, attach a wheel and pause immediately after spinning (so neither the wheel nor the axle would be in front of the motor), and just do everything else.
716
« on: March 28, 2013, 12:53:05 AM »
You could try a Perm 80 LW HS.
717
« on: March 25, 2013, 05:31:30 AM »
if you shave just 0.1 more kg you can get all irons
This sounds like a better idea. I'll probably do it later lol
718
« on: March 25, 2013, 03:07:23 AM »
FIVE AND A HALF MONTHS HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA  So yeah, trying to build something for ARBBC. And that is so not a clone of VB's PP2 (that was unintentional, I swear). It is meant to be a clone of Luigica's Drone, though. Will stack a 3rd pink when I have the patience. Components are stacked enough as is. Might have to rebuild the chassis, but again, when I have the patience. ._.
719
« on: March 23, 2013, 08:56:53 PM »
What's wrong with plows? They're the king stabilizer.
Plus, if you load the wheels out, you might be able to rotate the plows back a notch for a wider stance.
720
« on: March 22, 2013, 08:30:47 PM »
I was expecting something like a 40cm poly sheet for a windscreen bUT HOLY CRAP A MONSTER TRUCK THAT HAS SUSPENSION AND A PROPER LOOKING UNDERCARRIAGE
Pages: 1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 ... 364
|
Show Posts
