This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - kill343gs
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... 162
561
« on: April 21, 2016, 01:11:13 PM »
My brother is a ritual beast player, but I know for a fact the 2 decks I'd be interested in playing wouldn't stand a chance against raid raptors or ritual beasts or yang zings.
562
« on: April 20, 2016, 08:22:49 PM »
i havent played in close to a year but if youll let me play inferno tempest or token beat im in. my brother will play too.
id really like it if we did gimmick decks, like no real archetypes or something like that
563
« on: April 13, 2016, 01:49:11 PM »
the bedbug one is spoopy as hell
564
« on: April 13, 2016, 01:35:47 PM »
I had a good laugh when I saw this.
565
« on: April 12, 2016, 12:37:37 AM »
An official tourney based on my original RA2 annual series will begin discussion shortly after the release of RA3 so we can get a feel for where the meta is headed and reorganize the tournament staff for said tournament.
566
« on: April 10, 2016, 06:45:50 PM »
Oh it's for dinomist. I wasn't paying g that close of attention.
567
« on: April 10, 2016, 12:33:33 PM »
Normal summon red gadget, chain link 1 activate eff of gadget, chain link 2 activate effect of kagetokage in hand, chain link 3 activate chain summoning
568
« on: April 10, 2016, 01:00:07 AM »
Why run double summon gadgets when you can run chain summoning gadgets.....
569
« on: April 09, 2016, 09:21:27 AM »
I disagree with the last part. Instant fusion has been perfectly fine until noden came out. It's noden that was the problem. Hitting IF just hurts other decks that use it, punishing them because a new card that they don't even play exists. It's like how Laval's lost rekindling once firefist abused it. Or dragunities losing Ravine because konami released dragon rulers. I have when they do that.. Make an older deck unplayable because some new unbalanced BS that they released. I was a Laval player with a full foiled out main and extra including staples and Quasar back when it cost 90 bucks. My entire build was at one point worth around $400. And then because konami doesn't know how to balance new decks, I lost the core cardnof my deck.
570
« on: April 08, 2016, 01:22:51 PM »
The problem is that the decks that generate their own advantage can also just play upstart on top of that to play a 37 card deck. It's no secret that they want people playing the new stuff, that's how they sell product. Why do you think pendulums are pushed so hard, just as nekroz got banned to smithereens?
571
« on: April 08, 2016, 09:26:09 AM »
You can actually do some decent skinning in MS Paint if you take the time to do it right.
572
« on: April 08, 2016, 09:24:40 AM »
The staff admittedly hasn't been that on point as far as the minor offenses go. In the past week or so we've been working on ironing out the kinks on revamping our warning system and the ruleset that goes with it in order to ensure that all staff members are on the same page and working at the same level across the board in preparation for the influx of new users and/or increased activity when RA3 drops. Most of the credit this time around goes to Naryar for taking the time to break everything down. We should hopefully be finished up ironing it out and have it rolled out soon.
573
« on: April 07, 2016, 04:56:02 PM »
Any clashers around here? I've been messing around with this mobile game for a couple years now and just started taking it somewhat seriously in the past 6 months or so.
My level 4 clan needs a couple more active players for weekly wars. A lot of our top guys stopped playing recently. If anybody is interested feel free to shoot me a message here or on skype.
574
« on: April 06, 2016, 03:17:27 PM »
These are SO DOPE. Please don't change your style. I feel like it's 2008 again. I want to see more.
575
« on: April 06, 2016, 03:11:23 PM »
Interesting test, actually. I would definitely like to see it with a control board.
576
« on: April 04, 2016, 12:36:57 PM »
If I can slap something together in the next hour or two I might give it a go as well.
577
« on: April 04, 2016, 12:27:01 PM »
To an extent yes, but it's not like 'reason' has ever been used appropriately. And even if it was, it can still be pretty vague and users may fail to make the connection. I'm talking about having a real, solid correlation that can be seen with minimal chance for discrepancy.
578
« on: April 04, 2016, 12:20:41 PM »
As long as you keep building, I'll keep poking around.
579
« on: April 04, 2016, 12:17:12 PM »
Don't you guys see the IP address of every post? It wasn't wierd that so many came from Missouri?
It doesn't actively tell us what state the posts are coming from. The only time we would notice something going on is if we had a reason to believe that something like this was up. In general, we can't just assume that everybody is letting others access their accounts, Regardless, MNB, you are responsible for the security of your own account. The blood is on your hands just as much as it is Andy's, if that is what happened here.
580
« on: April 04, 2016, 12:13:41 PM »
My biggest problem with the whole rep thing going back is that it has no relation to the post or posts that you are being repped up or down on, so there's no visible correlation with what's going on. For that reason, the rep doesn't amount to anything whatsoever for the individual getting repped or the people who view the rep stats. If the system is supposed to show other members what a quality post looks like, then it is falling short in this aspect. And if you are getting repped down off of a single post, you would never know it. There is nothing telling you what specific behavior is causing the rep drop.
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... 162
|
Show Posts