Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - R01

Pages: 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ... 38
461
DSL TC Showcases / Re: 090901's DSL showcase.
« on: August 02, 2016, 12:30:38 PM »
NEW BOT FUCCBOIS

What was the name again? Also doesn't the skirt cause balance issues/not work well since the more away it is from the hinge the weaker it gets?

462
Tournament Archives / Re: Revolution - Discussion
« on: August 02, 2016, 11:05:30 AM »
Drive designed to break off? So it needs to be inside the chassis? Because one of your example bots isn't following that.
No idea what you're trying to do with fighting two beetleweights or surviving against a heavyweight and I find the life system way too complicated for something like this, why not simply make it based on points?
1. Cheap Norris style bot where the drive is supposed to just get knocked off and it basically becomes a crawler.
2. Robots get seeded by it to determine which order they are put into to the rumble match.
3. Really don't see how it's too complicated since after each round every robot other than the winner of said round will have lost a life. (Unless they of course earn extras by destroying 3 robots in one round)
True.

463
Tournament Archives / Re: Revolution - Discussion
« on: August 02, 2016, 09:49:08 AM »
Drive designed to break off? So it needs to be inside the chassis? Because one of your example bots isn't following that.
No idea what you're trying to do with fighting two beetleweights or surviving against a heavyweight and I find the life system way too complicated for something like this, why not simply make it based on points?

464
Tournament Archives / Re: People's Choice SBV
« on: August 02, 2016, 08:14:53 AM »
Oh, so lower bracket is single elimination?

The last fight showed the blurry action cam well.

465
Tournament Archives / Re: Hybrid Theory OR Clone Clash
« on: August 02, 2016, 07:02:55 AM »
Really like the concept. It will really show how skillful a builder you are seeing how unique and effective a design you can make from the same base as everyone else.

Sadly I don't DSL, but the Splash should be interesting...
You should join anyways. I don't play DSL as well but seeing how this has a already given chassis as well as being MW, there isn't that much you can do with it and it can't be possibly worse than my entry.

466
Contests / Re: Vote BOTM July/August 2016
« on: August 02, 2016, 06:50:04 AM »
Isn't #2 breaking the rules by not being a heavyweight? Also looks like #3 noticed a bit late that it needed to be a HW.

467
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Mazakari's IRL Designs
« on: August 02, 2016, 06:08:32 AM »
Loving it, reminds me of a mix of Chaos/Chaos2 except that it's front hinged. Wanting to build something like that right now but I'm not a fan of skinning all stuff.

468
Tournament Archives / Re: Hybrid Theory OR Clone Clash
« on: August 01, 2016, 06:34:40 PM »
You're allowed 3 modifications to the chassis. A modification would include:
  • Removing a component
  • Adding a component]
  • Moving (or rotating) a component
3 modifications isn't even enough to add 2WD.
The power of extenders my friend. The entire bot is going to be built off of extenders starting on 3 baseplate anchors.

469
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Suzaku's DSL Showcase
« on: August 01, 2016, 04:26:17 PM »
hate to rain on your parade but entering ring spinners has only been allowed in IRL style tournies as they break the rules of a normal dsl tourney (yeah odd i know) and nobody has made an irl tourney in a while.
if you want something that is similar though you can make a SnS with a static ring around the chassic with the wheels axle loaded on and that's dsl tourney legal.
How does that work? Thought that if it's IRL it works in DSL-S rules too?

470
Tournament Archives / Re: Wheely Tag Tournament II - Signups
« on: August 01, 2016, 04:19:20 PM »
There should be at least one team that's almost ready with their bots.

471
Contests / Re: BOTM July 2016
« on: August 01, 2016, 02:28:35 PM »
Just pm me. Trov is the only one who can see the uploader
Oh, already put it in the uploader(thought about doing that but since Trov was back and the uploader linked in the description). Will send a PM.

Edit: for some odd reason, watching the preview of the post removed the subject.

472
Contests / Re: BOTM July 2016
« on: August 01, 2016, 01:47:56 PM »
Threads not up yet. Get it built soon!
For some reason the uploader link doesn't want to work right, did take one from the earlier BOTM which worked.

473
Tournament Archives / Re: Hybrid Theory OR Clone Clash
« on: August 01, 2016, 11:26:08 AM »
Liking the clone clash but how would one stack those without using the stack glitch? Think it would be better if you added more anchors and removed the change option.
Also isn't it possible to add a poll to your own threads?

474
Tournament Archives / Re: THE REAL N00b Warz V SBV Thread
« on: August 01, 2016, 10:59:56 AM »
i approve of the music choices  :thumbup

was that spongebob rapping

it really sounds like that
jesus christ have you guys seriously never heard of parappa the rapper

i've heard OF him but i've never heard him in action

i'm going to stick with the spongebob theory though
That comment chain :P
A bit offtopic, but has there ever been a tournament(after "good building styles" were known) that had bots that were like the stock AI?

475
Contests / Re: BOTM July 2016
« on: August 01, 2016, 10:07:45 AM »
Deadline is Monday cuz thats when I'll be back from vacation.  Feel free to enter until then.
Enough time to actually build something with effort, was thinking about quickly doing a entry so there's at least more than two to decide on.
Or well, enough time if I wouldn't forget about it. Guess deadline is already up now.

476
Tournament Archives / Re: People's Choice SBV
« on: August 01, 2016, 08:47:53 AM »

477
Real Robotics Discussion / Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« on: July 31, 2016, 05:40:48 PM »
Mr Speed Squared(odd name by the way) looked like a first time entry spinner would look like
Competing in four series with three versions of Trouble And Strife don't count?

Okay.
Oh I didn't know they were a returning team(this show should really say that, much like the 3rd wars did). I never understood why they didn't use the first version of Trouble And Strife more.

478
Real Robotics Discussion / Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« on: July 31, 2016, 03:51:55 PM »
Fights were mostly uninteresting IMO and
was probably the most boring fight i have seen. The final was ok, hopefully there will be much more interesting fights to come but it seems as if episode 1 was the best. I may watch the first couple of fights in episode 3,  but I doubt it will get better. Still, nice to see the teams having fun making the show.
Oh come on, don't tell me you're one of those destruction guys too. The machines this time were working much better, you wouldn't have
While that was a boring fight it wasn't the most boring fight by miles, watch this instead:
Also apparently the extra fights we noticed in the intro are on the DVD that they're making.

479
Real Robotics Discussion / Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« on: July 31, 2016, 03:38:48 PM »
Alright, Episode's over:
Editing was MUCH better this time around, it was similar to how it was for the later half of the battles in Episode 1 which was good.
Is Thor built from the same team?
Looks like we are getting technical talk of where robots are used outside of Robot Combat every time now.
Also could they stop firing the fires every time? just keep them at full power.

480
Real Robotics Discussion / Re: BattleBots Season 2 Discussion Thread
« on: July 31, 2016, 12:51:55 PM »
I said it at the end of season 1.. having the fan favourite / super destructive robot loose to a strong boxy defensive robot isnt a good look to the casual audience..

Same situation as robot wars series 6 that resulted in the politics of series 7.

That said though I cant really pick much fault with this series, I think its been awesome..

Lock-Jaw deserved to loose imo, you can just put a block of metal on the front of your robot and rotate in circles blocking everything, if you play the defense game you need to still be able to push opponents around and utilise the hazards
Yes but that's exactly the problem in my view, rigging fights to get views(even if it's needed in this case which makes the situation even more harder) isn't the right thing to do, sadly this show needs all those people who only want to see destruction, and according to some, the producers themselves wanted Tombstone to win. But tell me how you are going to face spinners instead? Just go head on and slam your main weapon into them so it gets destroyed and they win by default? At this point they could stop fights as soon as a primary weapon is lost- oh right that still allows for destruction, as soon as both primary weapons are lost, which just shows how bad this got.

Lockjaw blocked every attempt from Brutus to attack which shows good driving, it was a war of attrition but Lockjaw was able to push them, not only that but the hit against the screws probably played a big part in why the spinner stopped in the end. Instead of only hyping the action and destruction they should also show how clever driving, war of attition and slamming other robots into the wall can be fun, and if this show continues doing stuff that way I can see it gone just like the 7th Series very soon.

Pages: 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ... 38