This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Team Code Red Robotics
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... 33
441
« on: December 14, 2018, 02:53:17 PM »
I just made one and its... Not effective
442
« on: December 14, 2018, 01:58:27 PM »
Could you please stop making "tutorials" for building robots that are completely ineffective in real combat and would not be accepted by any host with an idea of what controlled movement is? This idea has existed since 2004, and it hasn't been a good idea since. Please, stop and focus on building and improving designs that make sense and work well.
Also, PLEASE take advice from members that know what they are doing to improve. I don't want to see someone with a decent amount of ability become a meme the likes of Superbot. Don't take this as me trying to insult you or wandering spinners or whatever. I'm just trying to get you to understand where we are all coming from.
Oh, THERE not ineffectant. One alone killed 2 HW popups once...
Yeah, and talking about the building this bot for fun by Redalert and nobody else building it part, want to ask this to all Unrealistic and Standard players as I don't know much about the meta. Do you not like building WS for fun because both metas are primarily about competitiveness, efficiency, and effectivity, rather than fun (and that the kind of fun said by Redalert in general are applicable to the IRL meta instead, even if WS are probably un-IRL too)?
What's the "Fun" part in RA2 when you can't play with science? GTM is about sharing designs to get others' thoughts and comments. Not to mention, inspire.
By criticizing this (no offense), you're making me want to quit GTM. Do you even want that?
I'm just trying to expand GTM and contribute to it, so GTM isn't jeopardized.
There's a difference between contributing to the forums and making pointless threads like this. Yes we do like it for you sharing your designs and having a bit of fun in the process. But just think about it; What is the likelihood of someone following this tutorial to build an bot design that's not even tournament legal?
When making tutorials, there's need to be a common problem to solve for someone who's playing the game for the first time or someone who needs to refresh their knowledge, for example if someone doesn't know how to stack batteries, doesn't understand OBJRA2 or gets confused around snapper loading etc. Then a need for tutorial arises and is created by someone with the knowledge as a solution to help those struggling. By the end of the tutorial, the player now knows how to solve their problem. Here you got a tutorial from some random experiment that most users wouldn't understand or have no need for building a bot type that's not tournament legal and/or ineffective in combat. There is no problem here, only a solution without reason. We get that you're trying to contribute, but this is starting to feel like the time when you spammed the wiki with a heap load of unnecessary edits which mostly contained false information, personal opinions or contained pointless links to an "notable" AI pack. Just, think twice before you make a tutorials and see if anyone else needs it before yourself.
Got 'it. Thanks.
...and NO. They're not ineffective.
I’m going to make a WS, and I will tell you how it does
443
« on: December 13, 2018, 06:49:15 PM »
This robot has received good feedback. It's a simple rear-hinged flipper with steel rear panels to protect itself from a HS. Actually flips so that's always a bonus.
(Image removed from quote.)
444
« on: December 13, 2018, 12:54:11 PM »
people dont post tutorials because they can build their own robots without having to read a step by step guide
Well, Wandering Spinners are completely new, and they're an expansion off of the few ones that existed long ago.
This also gives people an idea of how to build one.
No, they’ve been done, all you’ve done is add a new name to it HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO TELL YOU
I know they've been done... but i've never seen an IronForge one before, so... I built the first in IronForge.
In Stock, There's a difference. There are many One Wheel HS that function like WS that existed before I started RA2, and that's why I don't post Stock WS.
Ironforge is a different mod, so It counts that I developed the first WS in Ironforge.
Case closed.
That’s like the first person to make a popup in IF saying that they invented popups
Popups are different- There isn't a different look or appearence. In other words, they attack the same way. Wandering Spinners all hit the same, but no two WS are alike.
I just remembered- No one's ever built a stock HS on disks, have they? That's a Stock Disk WS.
NERVOUS BREAKDOWN from my Special Forces pack is a perfect example of a Disk WS.
They are both bot types, and Cool down redalert, stop, just cool off, ok?
I'm not mad. It's just complicated.
Ok, and also I’m gonna send you a copy of DSL so you can try and improve on that front
445
« on: December 13, 2018, 12:48:14 PM »
people dont post tutorials because they can build their own robots without having to read a step by step guide
Well, Wandering Spinners are completely new, and they're an expansion off of the few ones that existed long ago.
This also gives people an idea of how to build one.
No, they’ve been done, all you’ve done is add a new name to it HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO TELL YOU
I know they've been done... but i've never seen an IronForge one before, so... I built the first in IronForge.
In Stock, There's a difference. There are many One Wheel HS that function like WS that existed before I started RA2, and that's why I don't post Stock WS.
Ironforge is a different mod, so It counts that I developed the first WS in Ironforge.
Case closed.
That’s like the first person to make a popup in IF saying that they invented popups
Popups are different- There isn't a different look or appearence. In other words, they attack the same way. Wandering Spinners all hit the same, but no two WS are alike.
I just remembered- No one's ever built a stock HS on disks, have they? That's a Stock Disk WS.
NERVOUS BREAKDOWN from my Special Forces pack is a perfect example of a Disk WS.
They are both bot types, and Cool down redalert, stop, just cool off, ok?
446
« on: December 13, 2018, 12:40:50 PM »
people dont post tutorials because they can build their own robots without having to read a step by step guide
Well, Wandering Spinners are completely new, and they're an expansion off of the few ones that existed long ago.
This also gives people an idea of how to build one.
No, they’ve been done, all you’ve done is add a new name to it HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO TELL YOU
I know they've been done... but i've never seen an IronForge one before, so... I built the first in IronForge.
In Stock, There's a difference. There are many One Wheel HS that function like WS that existed before I started RA2, and that's why I don't post Stock WS.
Ironforge is a different mod, so It counts that I developed the first WS in Ironforge.
Case closed.
That’s like the first person to make a popup in IF saying that they invented popups
447
« on: December 13, 2018, 12:31:03 PM »
people dont post tutorials because they can build their own robots without having to read a step by step guide
Well, Wandering Spinners are completely new, and they're an expansion off of the few ones that existed long ago.
This also gives people an idea of how to build one.
No, they’ve been done, all you’ve done is add a new name to it HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO TELL YOU
448
« on: December 13, 2018, 09:02:03 AM »
You know that guests are like 99% bots, right? 
What do you mean?
Bots mean that the user is not an actual Human, but just a program that functioned to wander around I think. The statement means that most of the guests are not Humans, but just programs
Edit: Also, why are you like that Redalert? Please listen to people and don't be so stubborn
This is why people don’t really like your “wandering spinners” they have been done before, and this thread should be closed
449
« on: December 13, 2018, 08:11:37 AM »
True, but I haven't seen any other members post bot instructions before...
Because they don’t think they invented a bot type that has been around since the beginning
450
« on: December 13, 2018, 08:06:16 AM »
Imagine repeatedly visiting/posting in a thread that you know is going to make you salty 🙄
Let the best multi on the site post all the weird bots he wants. He even keeps it contained in a single, easily ignorable thread for you.
You may not want to, but what about all the guests that look through GTM?
What does that have to do with anything
There are guests that look through the forums, and learn things from them. How else do guests learn more about RA2?
By watching showcases that improve
451
« on: December 13, 2018, 07:19:16 AM »
Imagine repeatedly visiting/posting in a thread that you know is going to make you salty 🙄
Let the best multi on the site post all the weird bots he wants. He even keeps it contained in a single, easily ignorable thread for you.
You may not want to, but what about all the guests that look through GTM?
What does that have to do with anything
452
« on: December 12, 2018, 10:49:23 AM »
Chaos ring.
[ Quoting of attachment images from other messages is not allowed ]
Why are you making the same exact ring spinner time after time again? Branch out and make a flipper, or a dustpan
453
« on: December 12, 2018, 05:24:40 AM »
I am horny and ready to go. When does the tournament begin?
454
« on: December 11, 2018, 03:52:24 PM »
Maybe Redalert is ACAMS? 
NO.
Don’t be so defensive ACAMS
I'm not ACAMS. Trust me. The caps were just a way getting it through without arguing.
Sounds like something ACAMS would say
455
« on: December 11, 2018, 01:00:11 PM »
Maybe Redalert is ACAMS?
NO.
Don’t be so defensive ACAMS
456
« on: December 11, 2018, 09:03:48 AM »
i refuse to believe someone as enthusiastic about ra2 is this dense. i've already told you to never use n-12s. flip the weapon motor over so the black bit isnt sticking out and it should run inverted fine.
instant fun needs a nifty to be full powered, and wtc is super ****ing slow for a poker, especially for one with axe heads'
youre wasting a ton of weight with the irons on the extenders on htgc and it would probably work better if it had a wedge instead
can we get insides on wedgebreaker? it definitely looks a little chunky
A. Yes, I'll see if I can flip the weapon motor. Thanks for that.
B. My forums are no swear zones. WTC is actually very effective, and too many pokers in the AI use HP
zteks. I want a variety.
C. HTGC has leftover weight. members of GTM want me to built to the weight limit. The chassis is too small for
a snapper. There will very likely be more FS in 2.0 that use wedges.
D. "Chunky" more like "Bulky" I'll bring up a screenshot of the internals when I can.
E. Instant Fun has 4 pinks. It's not underpowered.
Dude, Just take the feedback everyone is giving you, if you ignore it then you will continue to make robots that will be criticized, and then you will post saying about "How everyone is insulting you and your doing nothing wrong" That is only becsause you ignored their feedback, if you take the criticism, shape the robots up, and Listen to them, you will improve. Stop being so dense.
I do listen to them. I do plan to do something about HTGC's weight issue, and I do plan to flip the weapon motor on the HS over.
Ok then, it seems you are ignoring feedback sometimes
457
« on: December 11, 2018, 08:58:35 AM »
i refuse to believe someone as enthusiastic about ra2 is this dense. i've already told you to never use n-12s. flip the weapon motor over so the black bit isnt sticking out and it should run inverted fine.
instant fun needs a nifty to be full powered, and wtc is super ****ing slow for a poker, especially for one with axe heads'
youre wasting a ton of weight with the irons on the extenders on htgc and it would probably work better if it had a wedge instead
can we get insides on wedgebreaker? it definitely looks a little chunky
A. Yes, I'll see if I can flip the weapon motor. Thanks for that.
B. My forums are no swear zones. WTC is actually very effective, and too many pokers in the AI use HP
zteks. I want a variety.
C. HTGC has leftover weight. members of GTM want me to built to the weight limit. The chassis is too small for
a snapper. There will very likely be more FS in 2.0 that use wedges.
D. "Chunky" more like "Bulky" I'll bring up a screenshot of the internals when I can.
E. Instant Fun has 4 pinks. It's not underpowered.
Dude, Just take the feedback everyone is giving you, if you ignore it then you will continue to make robots that will be criticized, and then you will post saying about "How everyone is insulting you and your doing nothing wrong" That is only becsause you ignored their feedback, if you take the criticism, shape the robots up, and Listen to them, you will improve. Stop being so dense.
458
« on: December 10, 2018, 02:58:33 PM »
yeah i dont like ra2
Rlly dude
thats why im leaving red alert 2
459
« on: December 10, 2018, 12:55:47 PM »
Hey guys,
Sorry for the random post but recently I've found myself spending less and less time on RA2 and GTM and the time I do spend, I very rarely enjoy. This has got to the point where I quite literally don't want to get bots ready for tournaments and I certainly cant bring myself to build any. Anyway this post is here mainly to announce that Im leaving GTM for an undecided time and this means that Im also not carrying on my tournament. Im really really sorry to anybody who had entered and was excited for it but if I don't enjoy playing RA2 anymore, the best tournament I can probably churn out, if I could even manage to do it at all, would probably be very boring and unenjoyable to watch.
I am really sorry for any inconvenience and if I ever return to this game and GTM, I will do a different tournament instead of Shred Bots.
'Know how I relieve boredom- build weird AI packs, such as packs with bots that use lasers or packs that are only Wandering Spinners!
I hope everyone who entered your tournament understands why and doesn't flame out...
DID YOU JUST
460
« on: December 10, 2018, 06:14:11 AM »
thanks guys means a lot 
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... 33
|
Show Posts
