This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Enigm@
4221
« on: June 02, 2011, 02:14:19 PM »
What the  is this?
4222
« on: June 02, 2011, 11:55:51 AM »
Song: Axel F
Artist: Crazy Frog
Album: Novelty Hits
Via: [My brother's] iTunes
On topic: Anthrax - I am the Law
4223
« on: June 02, 2011, 07:20:20 AM »
I only play via Tunngle.
I can't get Hamachi to work, how good is Tunngle?
4224
« on: June 02, 2011, 07:01:52 AM »
I use a joystick.
Like a boss.
4225
« on: June 01, 2011, 10:00:16 PM »
MEGA-KEWL.
4226
« on: June 01, 2011, 09:35:53 PM »
...And Justice For Puppets? 
4227
« on: June 01, 2011, 06:41:32 PM »
I figured you built it... 
4228
« on: June 01, 2011, 03:14:30 PM »
MARVEL AT MY MASTERFUL WOODWORKING
(Image removed from quote.)
I want love to make to that cabinet.
4229
« on: June 01, 2011, 03:11:47 PM »
God dammit, just go to General Chatter, you don't make a thread.
4230
« on: June 01, 2011, 02:45:49 PM »
Can't see it. D:
4231
« on: June 01, 2011, 01:14:58 PM »
I have a combination of Asperger's, with traits of Tourettes. =D
FU*KING SCIENCE.
4232
« on: June 01, 2011, 12:53:37 PM »
T T
L
_
Problem?
A bit of one, actually. No FFFFFUUUUU-s for you I'm afraid, matey.
you don't have to get your panties in a knot just because 123 posted a picture...
4233
« on: June 01, 2011, 12:48:56 PM »
4234
« on: June 01, 2011, 06:57:55 AM »
Sounds like a personal problem, Avy.
4235
« on: May 31, 2011, 09:39:59 PM »
Hi.
4236
« on: May 31, 2011, 08:42:02 PM »
Got board. Wrote a letter to G.K:
Relative to my prior writings, this letter evinces an increased stridency in my commination of G.K.'s undertakings. This is because to deny this is to deny science, let alone the evidence of one's own powers of observation. For practical reasons, I have to confine my discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which I have something new to say. It's a well-known fact that I call this phenomenon "G.K.-ism". It's an equally well-known fact that misguided is as misguided does. When logic puts these two facts together, the necessary result is an understanding that even G.K.'s intimates are afraid that G.K. will break the mind and spirit, castrate the character, and kill the career of anyone whose ideas it deems to be gutless by next weekend. I have seen their fear manifested over and over again, and it is further evidence that G.K. would not hesitate to leave a large part of this country's workforce dislocated and disillusioned if it felt it could benefit from doing so.
The ultimate aim of G.K.'s blanket statements is to restructure society as a pyramid with G.K. at the top, G.K.'s janissaries directly underneath, rebarbative traitors beneath them, and the rest of at the bottom. This new societal structure will enable G.K. to dominate the whole earth and take possession of all its riches, which makes me realize that it wants us to think of it as a do-gooder. Keep in mind, though, that G.K. wants to "do good" with other people's money and often with other people's lives. If it really wanted to be a do-gooder, it could start by admitting that its unconscious preoccupation with a subjective cognizance of reality leads it to fuel the fires of hatred. This is not what I think; this is what I know. I additionally know that G.K. ought to realize that the most valuable of all talents is that of never using two words when one will do. Unfortunately, it tends to utter so much verbiage about allotheism that I can conclude only that everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, "The Naked Aggression of G.K.". In it, I chronicle all of G.K.'s allocutions from the contumacious to the detestable and conclude that G.K.'s goal is to let ungrateful loan sharks run rampant through the streets. How mealymouthed is that? How refractory? How noisome?
Someone has been giving G.K.'s brain a very thorough washing, and now G.K. is trying to do the same to us. To most people, the idea that G.K. is up to its neck in criminal activity is so endemic, so long ingrained, that when others conclude that we must not fail to be guided by experience and science and history when raking it over the coals for making Dadaism socially acceptable, this merely seems to be affirming an obvious truth. G.K. has blood on its hands. Yet it pretends to be an innocent lamb who has our best interests at heart. We all know the reality: If G.K. really had our best interests at heart, it wouldn't marginalize and eventually even outlaw responsible critics of what I call sniveling analphabetics. Some people have compared deranged jerks to prudish, treacherous wackos. I would like to take the comparison one step further: G.K. has brainwashed a large number of people into believing that the Eleventh Commandment is, "Thou shalt support those for whom hatred has become a way of life". Alas, we can't change people's minds overnight, and we can't instantly and totally dispel the delusions implanted by G.K.'s pertinacious lies, but we can say "no" to G.K.'s unregenerate communications. That might help a few brainwashees see that the biggest difference between me and G.K. is that G.K. wants to arouse the hostility and excite the cupidity of squalid theologasters. I, on the other hand, want to work together towards a shared vision.
G.K.'s speeches are full of declamation, bloviation, obfuscation, and equivocation. But I digress. G.K. is not the only one who needs to reassess its assumptions. Think about mercantalism-oriented sanguinary-types. They too should realize that if you study G.K.'s ornery opuscula long enough, you'll come to the inescapable conclusion that we must give to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance.
G.K. never tires of telling us that its refrains are Holy Writ. That's why I feel obligated to respond by reminding everyone that G.K.'s outbursts are like a Hydra. They continually acquire new heads and new strength. The only way to stunt their growth is to show pluck and optimism when presented with threats and terror. The only way to destroy its Hydra entirely is to provide more people with the knowledge that I've long thought it would be fun to try to explain to G.K. how the popularity of its antics among villainous sad sacks is a harbinger of backwards things to come. For the most part, I'm just curious as to how deep G.K. will have to dig into its profanity thesaurus to formulate a response.
To restate the obvious: I deeply believe that it's within our grasp to examine the warp and woof of G.K.'s dissertations. Be grateful for this first and last tidbit of comforting news. The rest of this letter will center around the way that it is more than a purely historical question to ask, "How did its reign of terror start?" or even the more urgent question, "How might it end?". No, we must ask, "How will its drones react when they discover that it wants to visit misery and havoc upon countless millions?" A complete answer to that question would take more space than I can afford, so I'll have to give you a simplified answer. For starters, that's just one side of the coin. The other side is that it likes forcing us to experience the full spectrum of the G.K. Rainbow of Frotteurism. That's the most damnable thing about it. It's also why G.K. has declared that it's staging a revolt against everyone who dares to rouse people's indignation at G.K.. It's revolting all right; the very sight of G.K. turns my stomach. All kidding aside, G.K. always demands instant gratification. That's all that is of concern to it; nothing else matters—except maybe to promote mediocrity over merit. I tell you this because I wouldn't judge G.K.'s confreres too harshly. They're sincerely just cannon fodder for G.K.'s plot to lead an impolitic jihad against those who oppose it.
G.K.'s choleric slurs are meticulously designed to keep the population unaware, uneducated, dumbed down, and focused on stupefying activities like video games. The intention is to prevent people from noticing that G.K. has been making it virtually impossible to fire incompetent workers. G.K. has been tearing down everything that can possibly be regarded as a support of cultural elevation. How can it perpetrate such an outrage against public propriety and decency? On the surface, it would seem to have something to do with the way that we must lead us all toward a better, brighter future in such a way that there is nothing it can do about it except learn to live with the fait accompli. But upon further investigation one will find that there is a simple answer to the question of what to do about G.K.'s policies. The difficult part is in implementing the answer. The answer is that we must sound the bugle of liberty.
G.K.'s propaganda factories continuously spew forth messages like, "G.K.'s vituperations are all sweetness and light" and, "Insufferable extremists are more deserving of honor than our nation's war heroes". What they don't tell you, though, is that if I am correctly informed, G.K. demands its freedoms while unhesitatingly and hypocritically encroaching upon the rights of others. In any case, it says that the bogeyman is going to get us if we don't agree to its demands. But then it turns around and says that it answers to no one. You know, you can't have it both ways, G.K.. I could go on and on about G.K.'s special form of larrikinism, but you get the general idea. The irony is that G.K.'s most cantankerous bons mots are also its most supercilious. As the French say, "Les extremes se touchent."
With this in mind, I must shape a world of dignity and harmony, a world of justice, solidarity, liberty, and prosperity. There's a little-known truth that isn't readily acknowledged by stubborn tax cheats (especially the juvenile type): G.K.'s traducements are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that everyone who doesn't share G.K.'s beliefs is a jackbooted, inhumane pettifogger deserving of death and damnation and they promote the mistaken idea that five-crystal orgone generators can eliminate mind-control energies that are being radiated from secret, underground, government facilities. It undoubtedly shouldn't be necessary to have to say such things, but if a cogent, logical argument entered G.K.'s brain, no doubt a concussion would result. G.K. relies heavily on "useful idiots", that is, people who unwittingly do G.K.'s dirty work for it. Without its swarms of useful idiots, G.K. would not have been able to conceal the fact that unless you define success using the sort of loosey-goosey standards by which it abides you'll realize that true measures of success involve acting as a positive role model for younger people. Success is getting the world to see that G.K. takes things out of context, twists them around, and then neglects to provide decent referencing so the reader can check up on it. It also ignores all of the evidence that doesn't support (or in many cases directly contradicts) its position.
Regardless of whether we consider G.K. a lunatic, an evil aggressor, or whatever, it likes to compare its ploys to the venerable documents that shaped this nation. The comparison, however, doesn't hold up beyond some uselessly broad, superficial similarities that are so vague and pointless, it's not even worth summarizing them. This is what G.K.'s trained seals try to prevent us from hearing about on radio and television or reading about in popular magazines and large-circulation papers. More emphatically, it confuses demagoguery with leadership and undocumented conspiracism with serious research—and G.K. knows it. Now that this letter is over, I pray that my logic and passion have convinced you that G.K. fits the stereotypical image of a stolid, sinful moron.
4237
« on: May 31, 2011, 08:34:00 PM »
I had a dream where my girlfriend committed suicide. Then I went into a deep depression and died of OD'ing on a Speedball.
What was the most disturbing is that I could feel the pain and anxiety of the dream.
4238
« on: May 31, 2011, 08:07:50 PM »
I thought u quit?
4239
« on: May 31, 2011, 07:52:04 PM »
Needs moar razors, less empty space.
He has a total of 10 razors, i don't see much space i can fill up, but i could probably fit a pink batt in there.
I've built a Heavyweight pop-up with 60 razors. 10=/=60
60 razors is complete overkill. Seism 13 only has 10 razors, R4 had 20. I think 20's the maximum you can get away with while still being reasonably effective.
And it has no external armour. :P
4240
« on: May 31, 2011, 07:26:16 PM »
Needs moar razors, less empty space.
He has a total of 10 razors, i don't see much space i can fill up, but i could probably fit a pink batt in there.
I've built a Heavyweight pop-up with 60 razors. 10=/=60
|
Show Posts