This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Resetti's Replicas
4221
« on: January 25, 2010, 10:57:25 AM »
Can I use a non-heavyweight chassis, like Li'l Dog, if I feel inclined to do so?
4222
« on: January 23, 2010, 09:25:48 PM »
4223
« on: January 22, 2010, 07:32:41 PM »
Ok... Spill the beans Goldenfox. What is the deal with your new chocolate-themed avatar?
Kraft, an American company, is trying to buy out Cadbury, the largest chocolate manufacturer in England. It appears some people are unhappy with this.
4224
« on: January 22, 2010, 06:22:24 PM »
It sounds like fun, I'll be in. Do you allow AI components?
4225
« on: January 22, 2010, 04:52:20 PM »
hmm ok i'll do it Sonny's way. Thanks, man.
No problem. Might I recommend you extend the deadline by a week, so that the voting process lasts a whole month? With everyone's busy schedules, that should allow people enough time to give it some thought. Also, can we make appeals for certain robots? Because I think that at least one replica should make it into the Hall of Fame, preferably, Conquering Clown.
4226
« on: January 22, 2010, 02:45:11 PM »
This should be done like the real Combat Robot Hall of Fame. Everyone anonymously submits a ballot with up to 25 nominees. Any robot that appears on 50% or more of the ballots gets inducted, whilst any robot with 25 %or more get Honorable mention
People can use this space to make a case for their favortie robots but the actual ballots should be submitted anonymously.
Those are my thoughts.
4227
« on: January 19, 2010, 04:24:55 PM »
I'm everyone. Every single account is mine. I amuse myself by by coming here and having elaborate conversations with myself.
4228
« on: January 19, 2010, 03:27:25 PM »
Best Built: Perjury to pain
Most Original: Hyperdirve 2
Coolest: Cheap Win 5000
4229
« on: January 19, 2010, 11:51:06 AM »
i had to bend sideways to read that.
it hurt my back Aren't children supposed to be springy?
4230
« on: January 19, 2010, 10:15:37 AM »
Hey everyone, sorry for causing the delay. Just to keep you in the know, GK and I couldn't get the Clown to work, so I've submitted a completely different robot. I haven't heard back from Zog as to whether it worked, but I only used one duplicate component this time, so it should be alright.
4231
« on: January 18, 2010, 03:29:59 PM »
Favorite- Placebo (Craaig)
Least Lucky - The Last and Dead Unicorn (Thyrus)
4232
« on: January 16, 2010, 04:11:48 PM »
just thought, did anyone slse hear BBC is bring robot wars Back?!? THIS YEAR
Robot Wars is owned by Five, not BBC. BBC can't bring Robot Wars back. Sorry.
4233
« on: January 16, 2010, 03:23:52 PM »
Let's get this thread back on the rails, shall we? Here are the presumptive byebots for the US vs UK tourney. For the UK, Napalm:  For the US, Bunny Attack:  I couldn't get a decent still, but here's a video clip:
4234
« on: January 16, 2010, 12:02:13 PM »
Twin Paradox
The lighting was bad from the bird's eye view, so I provided a second view to show the front better.
Try taking a picture in the Test Arena, that's what I do when I have glare problems
4235
« on: January 15, 2010, 01:20:37 PM »
Sign up closes today at 12 noon GMT.
What are you going to do about the empty spots? I could make you a byebot if need be
4236
« on: January 14, 2010, 11:36:27 PM »
Corkscrew in Series 6. Apparently there was a 20-second delay between the button being depressed and the pit opening, which caught the driver off guard. That robot would've easily made a semifinal, had it not been for that electronics glitch.
4237
« on: January 13, 2010, 06:05:24 PM »
Warhog, what a joke! It qualified thrice for Robot Wars, and despite having a huge spinner, all it ever broke was the arena wall. What a waste of speed and power, it's like making french fries out of New Potatoes. After it lost to freakin' Napalm in Series 5, that should have been indication that Warhog was not cut out for Robot Wars. Why is it that so many decent robots were rejected from Series 6 whilst Warhog was given yet another chance?
'cause they needed fodder
NAPALM was supposed to be fodder. Warhog lost to the fodder. And the point of having fodder in the first place is that it gets shredded and mangled and crushed and bounced, not engaged in a slow pushing match for 5 minutes that ends because both robots run out of juice.
4238
« on: January 13, 2010, 11:17:08 AM »
Warhog, what a joke! It qualified thrice for Robot Wars, and despite having a huge spinner, all it ever broke was the arena wall. What a waste of speed and power, it's like making french fries out of New Potatoes. After it lost to freakin' Napalm in Series 5, that should have been indication that Warhog was not cut out for Robot Wars. Why is it that so many decent robots were rejected from Series 6 whilst Warhog was given yet another chance?
4239
« on: January 13, 2010, 11:03:01 AM »
I don't understand why people put their birth-year into their user name, especially if they're in an age group that is generally seen as immature and ignorant. I mean, how can you take seriously a username that shouts out "I'm an 11-year-old religious nut!!!"
4240
« on: January 13, 2010, 10:55:35 AM »
 oooooops
Your new avatar makes it a lot harder for me to take you seriously
|
Show Posts