This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - russian roulette
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ... 91
421
« on: July 02, 2011, 11:29:41 AM »
@Joe
Yes I get that, but it is still stock but just a patched version. Stock showcase should be split in 2 sections if this would happen to go into effect though. Perhaps "RA2:Developer Release" and "RA2 Stock: GTM Release"
422
« on: July 02, 2011, 11:17:41 AM »
So long as it's kept to custom showcases I don't really care.
Why? It doesn't have custom components, and it is specific for stock. That is just like saying Effe glitched robots or robots that stack belong in the custom components section. If this glitch is kept at a limit, Stock tournament would become ALOT more popular.
423
« on: July 02, 2011, 09:53:01 AM »
Gets rid of creativity pretty much.
And it means anyone can build anything without trying really...
I don't necessarily agree with this. If you were given the choice to build something with no collision, you'd have more possibilities to create non generic robots and still be effective in combat. With there being more possibilities, there are more chances of you most likely not liking the way your bot turned out.
424
« on: July 02, 2011, 05:16:43 AM »
Don't release it otherwise stock popularity would decline within probably about a year. And to be honest it would effect everyone by a good bit and the robot building will become so easy even for beginners. Then probably a good amount of people would leave such as me and this forum would become DSL only forum for about two years and then it would be dead forever. RA2 will become a fully pledged `thing of the past`so release it and RA2 will be in its grave in about two years.
So if this forum wants to live for another 5 years then don't say anything about that glitch.
Too over dramatic?
Honestly, I think that this would HELP stock. If you'd look at BBEANS 5, if Click pitted a n00b robot against a 36 Mace HS or Siesm 16 (and many others) then the battle would last only one of two seconds. Whats the fun in that? Imagine stock where matches actually end with WBP and a bunch of debates and harder predictions like DSL, Stock tournaments would become insanely popular and they would also become alot harder to win (thus, one small little thing can cost you a victory). Also if everyone is just going to make 36 Mace HS's you can just allow only the first person who turned one in or just ban the glitch all together.
425
« on: July 01, 2011, 10:08:58 PM »
I feel like you can post anything and I would still like it.
426
« on: July 01, 2011, 07:49:08 PM »
Love it! I think the paint should be as minimal as possible, I think it would look better that way IMO.
427
« on: July 01, 2011, 07:37:13 PM »
and yes Russian Roulette, this is a hoax 3 years in the making.
I loled, I can see potential talking to click about this to create awesome Replicas fro DSL 3
428
« on: July 01, 2011, 06:09:26 PM »
Yes, it's a ton of fun to mess around with :D
This is definitively fake.
No it isn't, there have been many others find this glitch, just not figure out how to use it over and over again
Sorry, I am just very skeptical with how they worded it saying "No out of game Modifications needed" and how they are almost teasing everyone else out of it.
429
« on: July 01, 2011, 06:06:00 PM »
Best new and thought out tournament this year I must say. Cannot wait for entries!
430
« on: July 01, 2011, 05:46:56 PM »
Yes, it's a ton of fun to mess around with :D
This is definitively fake.
431
« on: July 01, 2011, 04:53:10 PM »
bump
You don't need to bump a topic that is currently active, patience is key :D
432
« on: July 01, 2011, 04:49:49 PM »
I am on the fence about this, them creating such a useful glitch and not releasing it seems a bit fuzzy. I must say though if this is real, then I happily applaud you. But if this is fake or a joke, then I'll laugh my a** off.
433
« on: June 30, 2011, 09:34:34 PM »
And then other people requested useless crap for smilies.
434
« on: June 30, 2011, 03:53:51 PM »
Sorry, I hate it :P
That was unnecessary and mean. Keep harsh opinions to your self.
1. He said he was sorry 2. Anything in "Modifications and Designs" should go through anyone's opinions or constructive criticism without objection.
435
« on: June 30, 2011, 03:51:17 PM »
we don't need  or  because noobs are obsessed with them
Oh the irony.
436
« on: June 30, 2011, 01:35:01 PM »
we need custom smileys, like ones you'd see on facepunch.
:V: :downs: :101: etc.
We are trying to stay AWAY from that. If you want to troll, there is a thing called an IMAGE UPLOADER.
437
« on: June 30, 2011, 10:15:06 AM »
They're unnecessary.
438
« on: June 30, 2011, 09:18:29 AM »
*headdesk* if you keep doing this or if everyone keeps getting their way, then we would most likely end up with MORE smilies than before.
439
« on: June 30, 2011, 09:12:43 AM »
What about Shoop Ploop? ;--------;
You fail at trolling, BOT
440
« on: June 30, 2011, 08:59:20 AM »
Agreed
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ... 91
|
Show Posts